Microstructural evolution of cemented paste backfill: Mercury intrusion porosimetry test results

The microstructural evolution of different cemented paste backfill (CPB) samples made with ground silica was evaluated using mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). The influence of three binders (OPC, OPC with fly ash, and OPC with blast furnace slag) and of three types of water (one deionised and two sulphated) on the microstructure was studied over the curing time. Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) tests were also performed to relate MIP results to the backfill mechanical strength. Among other findings, the MIP analyses indicate that the slag based binder combined with a mixing water having a high sulphate content (of 7549 ppm) showed the highest percentage of fine pores and the highest strength. This behaviour is related to the potential precipitation of sulphate phases in pores, which may contribute to strength enhancement. Based on MIP pore size distributions and UCS results, the authors propose a general relationship applicable for CPB.

[1]  I. Odler,et al.  Investigations on the relationship between porosity, structure and strength of hydrated Portland cement pastes. II. Effect of pore structure and of degree of hydration , 1985 .

[2]  Linhua Jiang,et al.  Pore structure and its effect on strength of high-volume fly ash paste , 1999 .

[3]  Michel Aubertin,et al.  Hydraulic conductivity of homogenized tailings from hard rock mines , 1996 .

[4]  Mamadou Fall,et al.  Experimental characterization of the influence of tailings fineness and density on the quality of cemented paste backfill , 2005 .

[5]  A. Neville.  Properties of Concrete , 1968 .

[6]  Douglas Windslow,et al.  A Mercury Porosimetry Study of the Evolution of Porosity in Portland Cement : Technical Publication , 1969 .

[7]  A. Kesimal,et al.  Evaluation of paste backfill mixtures consisting of sulphide-rich mill tailings and varying cement contents , 2004 .

[8]  Konstantin Kovler,et al.  Setting and hardening of gypsum-Portland cement-silica fume blends, Part 2 : Early strength, DTA, XRD, and SEM observations , 1998 .

[9]  Y. Cai,et al.  Study of chloride binding and diffusion in GGBS concrete , 2003 .

[10]  V. Evangelou.  Pyrite oxidation and its control , 1995 .

[11]  S. Wild,et al.  Pore size distribution and compressive strength of waste clay brick mortar , 2001 .

[12]  M. Aubertin,et al.  Reactivity and mineralogical evolution of an underground mine sulphidic cemented paste backfill , 2006 .

[13]  Li Li,et al.  A general relationship between porosity and uniaxial strength of engineering materials , 2003 .

[14]  Ernest K. Yanful,et al.  A discussion of the application of mercury intrusion porosimetry for the investigation of soils, including an evaluation of its use to estimate volume change in compacted clayey soils , 2001 .

[15]  J. Marchand,et al.  14 – Pore Structure , 2001 .

[16]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Handbook of thermal analysis of construction materials , 2002 .

[17]  Ayhan Kesimal,et al.  The effect of desliming by sedimentation on paste backfill performance , 2003 .

[18]  V. V. Rzhevskiĭ,et al.  The physics of rocks , 1971 .

[19]  K. Kjellsen.  Heat curing and post-heat curing regimes of high-performance concrete: Influence on microstructure and C-S-H composition , 1996 .

[20]  G. K. Moir,et al.  Degrees of reaction of the slag in some blends with Portland cements , 1996 .

[21]  J. Cayouette,et al.  Optimization of the paste backfill plant at Louvicourt mine , 2003 .

[22]  Jacques Ouellet,et al.  Cementitious backfill with high sulfur content Physical, chemical, and mineralogical characterization , 1999 .

[23]  Tikou Belem,et al.  The effect of microstructural evolution on the physical properties of paste Backfill , 2001 .

[24]  G. P. Lawrence.  STABILITY OF SOIL PORES DURING MERCURY INTRUSION POROSIMETRY , 1978 .

[25]  Nagaratnam Sivakugan,et al.  Underground Mining with Backfills , 2007, Soils and Rocks.

[26]  B. Leupen,et al.  Design and analysis , 1997 .

[27]  Amnon Katz,et al.  Utilization of industrial by-products for the production of controlled low strength materials (CLSM). , 2004, Waste management.

[28]  I. Odler,et al.  Stresses generated in expansive reactions of cementitious systems , 2002 .

[29]  C. Poon,et al.  The influence of different curing conditions onthe pore structure and related properties of fly-ash cement pastes and mortars , 1997 .

[30]  I. Odler,et al.  Possibilities of quantitative determination of the AFt-(ettringite) and AFm-(monosulphate) phases in hydrated cement pastes , 1984 .

[31]  Kenneth C. Hover,et al.  Mercury porosimetry of hardened cement pastes , 1999 .

[32]  W. Brewer,et al.  CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH MATERIALS (CLSM) , 1996 .

[33]  J. Beaudoin,et al.  Pretreatment of hardened hydrated cement pastes for mercury intrusion measurements , 1991 .

[34]  Tikou Belem,et al.  A contribution to understanding the hardening process of cemented pastefill , 2004 .

[35]  F. Glasser,et al.  Thermal stability and decomposition mechanisms of ettringite at <120°C , 2001 .

[36]  J. Escalante,et al.  Reactivity of blast-furnace slag in Portland cement blends hydrated under different conditions , 2001 .

[37]  Tikou Belem,et al.  Chemical factors that influence the performance of mine sulphidic paste backfill , 2002 .

[38]  Q. Niu,et al.  EFFECT OF SUPERFINE SLAG POWDER ON CEMENT PROPERTIES , 2002 .

[39]  Mamadou Fall,et al.  Modeling the effect of sulphate on strength development of paste backfill and binder mixture optimization , 2005 .

[40]  Said Kenai,et al.  Performance of compacted cement-stabilised soil , 2004 .