Uncertainty law in ambient modal identification---Part II: Implication and field verification

This paper presents a qualitative analysis of the uncertainty laws for the modal parameters identified in a Bayesian approach using ambient vibration data, based on the theory developed in the companion paper. The uncertainty laws are also appraised using field test data. The paper intends to provide insights for planning ambient vibration tests and managing the uncertainties of the identified modal parameters. Some typical questions that shall be addressed are: to estimate the damping ratio to within 30% of posterior coefficient of variation (c.o.v), what is the minimum data duration? Will deploying an additional accelerometer significantly improve the accuracy in damping (or frequency)? Answers to these questions based on this work can be found in the Conclusions. As the Bayesian approach allows full use of information in the data for given modeling assumptions, the uncertainty laws obtained in this work represent the lower limit of uncertainty (estimation error) that can be achieved by any method (Bayesian or non-Bayesian).

[1]  P. H. Kirkegaard,et al.  On the optimal location of sensors for parametric identification of linear structural systems , 1994 .

[2]  W. Fladung,et al.  APPLICATION AND CORRECTION OF THE EXPONENTIAL WINDOW FOR FREQUENCY RESPONSE FUNCTIONS , 1997 .

[3]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Field observations on modal properties of two tall buildings under strong wind , 2012 .

[4]  S. Au.  Fast Bayesian ambient modal identification in the frequency domain, Part II: Posterior uncertainty , 2012 .

[5]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Connecting Bayesian and frequentist quantification of parameter uncertainty in system identification , 2012 .

[6]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems , 2004 .

[7]  Kenan Y. Sanliturk,et al.  Damping uncertainty due to noise and exponential windowing , 2011 .

[8]  Yukio Tamura,et al.  Damping Evaluation Using Full-Scale Data of Buildings in Japan , 2003 .

[9]  Olli Aumala,et al.  On windowing effects in estimating averaged periodograms of noisy signals , 2000 .

[10]  Peter J. Torvik,et al.  On estimating system damping from frequency response bandwidths , 2011 .

[11]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Full-Scale Validation of Dynamic Wind Load on a Super-Tall Building under Strong Wind , 2012 .

[12]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Bayesian operational modal analysis: Theory, computation, practice , 2013 .

[13]  Hong-Nan Li,et al.  Methodology Developments in Sensor Placement for Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructures , 2012, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[14]  A. P. Jeary,et al.  Damping in structures , 1997 .

[15]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Erratum for “Fast Bayesian FFT Method for Ambient Modal Identification with Separated Modes” by Siu-Kui Au , 2013 .

[16]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  On assessing the posterior mode shape uncertainty in ambient modal identification , 2011 .

[17]  Monica D. Kohler,et al.  Earthquake and Ambient Vibration Monitoring of the Steel-Frame UCLA Factor Building , 2005 .

[18]  D.G. Dudley,et al.  Dynamic system identification experiment design and data analysis , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Fast Bayesian FFT Method for Ambient Modal Identification with Separated Modes , 2011 .