An acoustic and perceptual analysis of /t/ and /d/ flaps in American English

Abstract This paper presents an acoustic and perceptual study of alveolar flaps in American English. In the acoustic study, vowel duration differences in disyllabic tokens replicated previous findings in that vowels preceding /d/ were significantly longer than those preceding /t/. Flap frequency was also analyzed based on a method of distinguishing flapped from unflapped stops on a speaker-by-speaker basis. It was discovered that females flapped more often than males and that participants were more likely to flap when they were less aware of the contrast between /t/ and /d/. Contrary to past research, neither word frequency nor morphological complexity affected flap frequency in the present study. In the perceptual study, four naturally produced word pairs were used to manipulate underlying representation (/t/ or /d/), vowel duration preceding the flap, and word frequency. Vowel duration alone did not predict the listeners’ perception of flapped /t/ and /d/; word frequency, where high frequency words were identified correctly more often than low frequency words, and a d-bias, where /d/ flaps were identified correctly more often than /t/ flaps, did prove significant. Unlike previous research, this study uses nonarbitrary values to distinguish flapped from unflapped tokens and draws connections between the acoustic and perceptual results.

[1]  G. Weismer,et al.  Closure duration of stop consonants , 1983 .

[2]  V. Zue,et al.  Acoustic study of medial /t,d/ in American English , 1979 .

[3]  Alice Turk,et al.  The American English Flapping Rule and the Effect of Stress on Stop Consonant Durations , 1992 .

[4]  W. M. Fischer,et al.  Intervocalic Flapping in English , 1976 .

[5]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[6]  J. Charles-Luce,et al.  The effects of semantic predictability in non-pathological older adults' production of a phonemic contrast. , 1999, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[7]  D. J. Sharf,et al.  DISTINCTIVENESS OF 'VOICED T' WORDS , 1960 .

[8]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[9]  Matthew Y. Chen Vowel Length Variation as a Function of the Voicing of the Consonant Environment , 1970 .

[10]  J. Charles-Luce,et al.  Effects of semantic predictability on children's preservation of a phonemic voice contrast , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[11]  D. J. Sharf,et al.  Duration of Post-Stress Intervocalic Stops and Preceding Vowels , 1962 .

[12]  P. Boersma Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 4.4.24) , 2006 .

[13]  P. Boersma Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.05) , 2009 .

[14]  R-M. S. Heffner,et al.  Notes on the Length of Vowels (III) , 1940 .

[15]  André Malécot,et al.  The /t/ : /d/ distinction in American alveolar flai's , 1968 .

[16]  J. Charles-Luce,et al.  Cognitive Factors Involved in Preserving a Phonemic Contrast , 1997, Language and speech.

[17]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Relations of sex and dialect to reduction , 1994, Speech Communication.

[18]  David Patterson,et al.  Variant frequency in American English flap production , 2001 .

[19]  Robert A. Fox,et al.  Dental flaps, vowel duration and rule ordering in American English , 1977 .