The Overreliance of Accreditors on Consensus Standards
暂无分享,去创建一个
The legitimacy of accreditation in teacher education is rooted in political consensus and power and, to a lesser extent, in scholarship. Both roots, however, are fragile and weak. Consequently, to take a negative example, there is no accepted concept of educational malpractice in the field. The standards we have are at best hypotheses awaiting confirmation or falsification. The legitimacy of accreditation should be rooted in the scholarly evidence that the program has fulfilled the claim that its graduates are competent, caring, and qualified.
[1] L. Darling-Hammond. Teacher Quality and Student Achievement , 2000 .
[2] Sandra P. Horn,et al. Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation , 1997 .
[3] R. Howard,et al. Adequacy and Allocation within Higher Education: Funding the Work of Education Schools , 2000 .
[4] L. Darling-Hammond. Teaching for America's Future: National Commissions and Vested Interests in an Almost Profession , 2000 .