Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis

A growing number of studies argue that organizational ambidexterity is increasingly important for the sustained competitive advantage of firms. However, organizational ambidexterity studies have been conducted in a wide variety of industries and methodological settings, and the empirical results have been mixed. The purpose of this article is to systematically examine the organizational ambidexterity–performance relationship to reconcile the mixed results of prior research. By conducting a meta-analysis of prior studies on organizational ambidexterity and performance, we find that positive and significant Organizational ambidexterity–performance relationships are to a large extent moderated by contextual factors and methodological choices: Organizational ambidexterity is particularly important for performance in nonmanufacturing industries and at higher levels of analysis. Also, the performance effects are stronger when “combined” measures of organizational ambidexterity and perceptual performance are use...

[1]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Clarifying the Distinctive Contribution of Ambidexterity to the Field of Organization Studies , 2013 .

[2]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[3]  M. Hughes,et al.  Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small- to medium-sized firms , 2012 .

[4]  Ko de Ruyter,et al.  Generating Sales While Providing Service: A Study of Customer Service Representatives' Ambidextrous Behavior , 2012 .

[5]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  When Critical Knowledge Is Most Critical , 2011 .

[6]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Proactive R&D management and firm growth: A punctuated equilibrium model , 2011 .

[7]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Meta-Analytic Choices and Judgment Calls: Implications for Theory Building and Testing, Obtained Effect Sizes, and Scholarly Impact , 2011 .

[8]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[9]  John Hulland,et al.  Ambidextrous organizations and firm performance: the role of marketing function implementation , 2010 .

[10]  Qing Cao,et al.  Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 2009 .

[12]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach , 2009 .

[13]  Zeki Simsek.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding , 2009 .

[14]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition , 2009 .

[15]  S. Snell,et al.  Intellectual Capital Architectures and Ambidextrous Learning: A Framework for Human Resource Management , 2009 .

[16]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules , 2009 .

[17]  Arun Rai,et al.  Knowledge Sharing Ambidexterity in Long-Term Interorganizational Relationships , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[18]  B. Menguc,et al.  The asymmetric moderating role of market orientation on the ambidexterity–firm performance relationship for prospectors and defenders , 2008 .

[19]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[20]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Position, leverage and opportunity: a typology of strategic logics linking resources with competitive advantage , 2008 .

[21]  Andreas Voigt,et al.  Do Cultural Differences Matter in Mergers and Acquisitions? A Tentative Model and Examination , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Irem Demirkan,et al.  The Performance Consequences of Ambidexterity in Strategic Alliance Formations: Empirical Investigation and Computational Theorizing , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[23]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[24]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[25]  Christine M. Beckman.  The Influence of Founding Team Company Affiliations on Firm Behavior , 2006 .

[26]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation , 2005 .

[27]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[28]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[29]  David R. King,et al.  Meta-analyses of Post-acquisition Performance: Indications of Unidentified Moderators , 2004 .

[30]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[31]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Winston Bennett,et al.  Conducting Meta-Analysis Using SAS , 2001 .

[33]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[34]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[35]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[36]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[37]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[38]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .

[39]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[40]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .