A Prospective, Cohort Study of SITOIGANAP to Treat Glioblastoma When Given in Combination With Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/Cyclophosphamide/Bevacizumab/Nivolumab or Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/Cyclophosphamide/Bevacizumab/Pembrolizumab in Patients Who Failed

Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary, malignant brain tumor in adults and has a poor prognosis. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of newly diagnosed GBM is approximately 6 months. The recurrence rate approaches 100%, and the case-fatality ratio approaches one. Half the patients die within 8 months of recurrence, and 5-year survival is less than 10%. Advances in treatment options are urgently needed. We report on the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic vaccine (SITOIGANAP: Epitopoietic Research Corporation) administered to 21 patients with recurrent GBM (rGBM) under a Right-to-Try/Expanded Access program. SITOIGANAP is composed of both autologous and allogeneic tumor cells and lysates. Methods Twenty-one patients with rGBM received SITOIGANAP on 28-day cycles in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), cyclophosphamide, bevacizumab, and an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) monoclonal antibody (either nivolumab or pembrolizumab). Results The mPFS was 9.14 months, and the median overall survival (mOS) was 19.63 months from protocol entry. Currently, 14 patients (67%) are at least 6 months past their first SITOIGANAP cycle; 10 patients (48%) have received at least six cycles and have a mOS of 30.64 months and 1-year survival of 90%. The enrollment and end-of-study CD3+/CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts strongly correlate with OS. Conclusions The addition of SITOIGANAP/GM-CSF/cyclophosphamide to bevacizumab and an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody resulted in a significant survival benefit compared to historic control values in rGBM with minimal toxicity compared to current therapy.

[1]  Pieter Wesseling,et al.  cIMPACT‐NOW update 6: new entity and diagnostic principle recommendations of the cIMPACT‐Utrecht meeting on future CNS tumor classification and grading , 2020, Brain pathology.

[2]  K. Schalper,et al.  Neoadjuvant nivolumab modifies the tumor immune microenvironment in resectable glioblastoma , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[3]  E. Kirson,et al.  Tumor Treating Fields for Glioblastoma Treatment: Patient Satisfaction and Compliance With the Second-Generation Optune® System , 2019, Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology.

[4]  P. Wen,et al.  Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy promotes a survival benefit with intratumoral and systemic immune responses in recurrent glioblastoma , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[5]  Thomas C. Chen,et al.  Therapeutic Immunization against Glioblastoma , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.

[6]  A. Schönthal,et al.  Phase II study of ERC1671 plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab plus placebo in recurrent glioblastoma: interim results and correlations with CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts , 2018, CNS oncology.

[7]  M. Weller,et al.  Bevacizumab may improve quality of life, but not overall survival in glioblastoma: an epidemiological study , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  F. Lieberman,et al.  Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA.

[9]  Martin Klein,et al.  Lomustine and Bevacizumab in Progressive Glioblastoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  A. Brandes,et al.  AVAREG: a phase II, randomized, noncomparative study of fotemustine or bevacizumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. , 2016, Neuro-oncology.

[11]  A. Brandes,et al.  A Phase II randomized study of galunisertib monotherapy or galunisertib plus lomustine compared with lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. , 2016, Neuro-oncology.

[12]  Juanita Lopez,et al.  Immuno-oncology combinations: raising the tail of the survival curve , 2016, Cancer biology & medicine.

[13]  A. Weyerbrock,et al.  Progression-free and overall survival in patients with recurrent Glioblastoma multiforme treated with last-line bevacizumab versus bevacizumab/lomustine , 2016, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[14]  J. Simes,et al.  Randomized phase 2 study of carboplatin and bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[15]  Peter Hantos,et al.  First clinical results of a personalized immunotherapeutic vaccine against recurrent, incompletely resected, treatment-resistant glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors, based on combined allo- and auto-immune tumor reactivity. , 2015, Vaccine.

[16]  Thomas C Chen,et al.  Use of ERC-1671 Vaccine in a Patient with Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme after Progression during Bevacizumab Therapy: First Published Report. , 2015, The Permanente journal.

[17]  R. Vernhout,et al.  Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  J. Baehring,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. , 2012 .

[20]  P. Gutin,et al.  NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[21]  W. Mason,et al.  Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  M. Trippel,et al.  BCNU for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: efficacy, toxicity and prognostic factors , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[23]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  John A Butman,et al.  Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Timothy F Cloughesy,et al.  Progression-free survival: an important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. , 2008, Neuro-oncology.

[26]  Thomas C Chen,et al.  Therapeutic vaccination against malignant gliomas based on allorecognition and syngeneic tumor antigens: proof of principle in two strains of rat. , 2008, Vaccine.

[27]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Placebo-controlled trial of safety and efficacy of intraoperative controlled delivery by biodegradable polymers of chemotherapy for recurrent gliomas , 1995, The Lancet.

[28]  H. Sutton AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY , 1937 .

[29]  J. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2012-2016. , 2019, Neuro-oncology.

[30]  A. Brandes,et al.  Regorafenib compared with lomustine in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (REGOMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[31]  A. Stathopoulos Therapeutic brain cancer targeting by gene therapy and immunomodulation : a translational study , 2012 .

[32]  M. Chamberlain,et al.  Salvage therapy with single agent bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma , 2009, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[33]  E. Glaser The randomized clinical trial. , 1972, The New England journal of medicine.