Microstructural Failure Mechanisms in the Human Proximal Femur for Sideways Fall Loading

The etiology of hip fractures remains unclear but might be elucidated by an improved understanding of the microstructural failure mechanisms of the human proximal femur during a sideways fall impact. In this context, we biomechanically tested 12 cadaver proximal femurs (aged 76 ± 10 years; 8 female, 4 male) to directly measure strength for a sideways fall and also performed micro‐computed tomography (CT)‐based, nonlinear finite element analysis of the same bones (82‐micron‐sized elements, ∼120 million elements per model) to estimate the amount and location of internal tissue‐level failure (by ductile yielding) at initial structural failure of the femur. We found that the correlation between the directly measured yield strength of the femur and the finite element prediction was high (R2 = 0.94, p < 0.0001), supporting the validity of the finite element simulations of failure. In these simulations, the failure of just a tiny proportion of the bone tissue (1.5% to 6.4% across all bones) led to initial structural failure of the femur. The proportion of failed tissue, estimated by the finite element models, decreased with decreasing measured femoral strength (R2 = 0.88, p < 0.0001) and was more highly correlated with measured strength than any measure of bone volume, mass, or density. Volume‐wise, trabecular failure occurred earlier and was more prominent than cortical failure in all femurs and dominated in the very weakest femurs. Femurs with low measured strength relative to their areal bone mineral density (BMD) (by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry [DXA]) had a low proportion of trabecular bone compared with cortical bone in the femoral neck (p < 0.001), less failed tissue (p < 0.05), and low structural redundancy (p < 0.005). We conclude that initial failure of the femur during a sideways fall is associated with failure of just a tiny proportion of the bone tissue, failure of the trabecular tissue dominating in the very weakest femurs owing in part to a lack of structural redundancy. © 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[1]  N. Bayley,et al.  Failure , 1890, The Hospital.

[2]  Failure of trabecular bone with simulated lytic defects can be predicted non‐invasively by structural analysis , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  G. Holzer,et al.  Hip Fractures and the Contribution of Cortical Versus Trabecular Bone to Femoral Neck Strength , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Cortical bone finite element models in the estimation of experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur. , 2012, Bone.

[5]  Glen L Niebur,et al.  Biomechanical effects of intraspecimen variations in tissue modulus for trabecular bone. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular microfracture and the influence of pyridinium and non-enzymatic glycation-mediated collagen cross-links. , 2005, Bone.

[7]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure--biomechanical consequences. , 1989, Bone.

[8]  G. Pharr,et al.  Mechanical and morphological variation of the human lumbar vertebral cortical and trabecular bone. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Comparison of hip fracture risk prediction by femoral aBMD to experimentally measured factor of risk. , 2010, Bone.

[10]  M. Hahn,et al.  Heterogeneity of the skeleton: Comparison of the trabecular microarchitecture of the spine, the iliac crest, the femur, and the calcaneus , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  G. Beaupré,et al.  New QCT Analysis Approach Shows the Importance of Fall Orientation on Femoral Neck Strength , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  J. Kinney,et al.  On the importance of geometric nonlinearity in finite-element simulations of trabecular bone failure. , 2003, Bone.

[13]  Tony M. Keaveny,et al.  The micro-mechanics of cortical shell removal in the human vertebral body , 2007 .

[14]  Mark F. Adams,et al.  Ultrascalable Implicit Finite Element Analyses in Solid Mechanics with over a Half a Billion Degrees of Freedom , 2004, Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE SC2004 Conference.

[15]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  R. Aspden,et al.  Femoral geometry as a risk factor for osteoporotic hip fracture in men and women. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  H K Genant,et al.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength. , 1997, Bone.

[18]  P. Guy,et al.  Cortical and trabecular bone in the femoral neck both contribute to proximal femur failure load prediction , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[19]  E. Seeman,et al.  Women and men with hip fractures have a longer femoral neck moment arm and greater impact load in a sideways fall , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[20]  M. V. D. van der Meulen,et al.  Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  FEAP - - A Finite Element Analysis Program , 2011 .

[22]  Paul Sajda,et al.  Micromechanical analyses of vertebral trabecular bone based on individual trabeculae segmentation of plates and rods. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Edward T. Harrigan,et al.  NAtioNAl CooperAtive HigHwAy reseArCH progrAm , 2013 .

[24]  P. Papadopoulos,et al.  Influence of bone volume fraction and architecture on computed large-deformation failure mechanisms in human trabecular bone. , 2006, Bone.

[25]  G. Niebur,et al.  Biomechanics of trabecular bone. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[26]  P. Papadopoulos,et al.  Vertebral fragility and structural redundancy , 2012, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Failure mechanisms in human vertebral cancellous bone. , 1994, Bone.

[28]  G. Niebur,et al.  Type and orientation of yielded trabeculae during overloading of trabecular bone along orthogonal directions. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Jia Lu,et al.  A general framework for the numerical solution of problems in finite elasto-plasticity , 1998 .

[30]  P Zioupos,et al.  Fracture of bone tissue: The 'hows' and the 'whys'. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[31]  S. Beer,et al.  Strength , 1875, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[32]  B. Snyder,et al.  The interaction of microstructure and volume fraction in predicting failure in cancellous bone. , 2006, Bone.

[33]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Theoretical bounds for the influence of tissue-level ductility on the apparent-level strength of human trabecular bone. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  D. Wilkie,et al.  Morphological and structural characteristics of the proximal femur in human and rat. , 1997, Bone.

[35]  J A McGeough,et al.  Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.