Screening for diabetes in general practice: cross sectional population study

Abstract Objective: To assess the policy proposed by the American Diabetes Association of universal screening in general practice of all patients aged over 45 years for diabetes. Design: Cross sectional population study. Setting: Local general practice in the United Kingdom. Participants: All patients aged over 45 not known to have diabetes. Main outcome measures: Prevalence of diabetes in the screened population, cardiovascular risk profile of patients diagnosed as having diabetes after screening. Results: Of 2481 patients aged over 45 and not known to have diabetes, 876 attended for screening. There were no significant demographic differences between the screened and unscreened patients. Prevalence of diabetes in patients with age as a sole risk factor was 0.2% (95% confidence interval 0% to 1.4%). Prevalence of diabetes in patients with age and one or more other risk factors (hypertension, obesity, or a family history of diabetes) was 2.8% (1.6% to 4.7%). Four hours a week for a year would be needed to screen all people over 45 in the practice's population; about half this time would be needed to screen patients with risk factors other than age. More than 80% of patients newly diagnosed as having diabetes had a 10 year risk of coronary heart disease >15%, 73% (45% to 92%) were hypertensive, and 73% (45% to 92%) had a cholesterol concentration >5 mmol/l. Conclusions: Screening for diabetes in general practice by measuring fasting blood glucose is feasible but has a very low yield in patients whose sole risk factor for diabetes is age over 45. Screening in a low risk population would best be targeted at patients with multiple risk factors. What is already known on this topic Between a third and a half of cases of diabetes are undiagnosed at any one time New cases can be identified by screening groups of patients at risk The American Diabetes Association has proposed the screening of all patients aged over 45 every three years What this study adds Screening for diabetes in general practice by measuring fasting blood glucose is feasible but requires much staff time Screening solely on the basis of age has a very low yield and screening would best be targeted at patients with multiple risk factors for diabetes

[1]  E. Feskens,et al.  Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetic Association diagnostic criteria , 1999, The Lancet.

[2]  T. Harris,et al.  American Diabetes Association diabetes diagnostic criteria, advancing age, and cardiovascular disease risk profiles: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[3]  Petros Nihoyannopoulos,et al.  Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice , 1998, Heart.

[4]  Nicholas J Wareham,et al.  Should we screen for type 2 diabetes? Evaluation against National Screening Committee criteria , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  P. Raskin,et al.  Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[6]  T. T. 1. D. T. S. Group,et al.  Is fasting glucose sufficient to define diabetes? Epidemiological data from 20 European studies , 1999, Diabetologia.

[7]  R. Hill,et al.  The Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus in a Typical English Community , 1985, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[8]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  Evaluation of Fasting Plasma Glucose as Screening Test for NIDDM in Older Adults: Rancho Bernardo Study , 1991, Diabetes Care.

[9]  K. Flegal,et al.  Prevalence of Diabetes, Impaired Fasting Glucose, and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in U.S. Adults: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994 , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[10]  Beverley Balkau,et al.  High Blood Glucose Concentration Is a Risk Factor for Mortality in Middle-Aged Nondiabetic Men: 20-year follow-up in the Whitehall Study, the Paris Prospective Study, and the Helsinki Policemen Study , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[11]  P. Zimmet,et al.  Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO Consultation , 1998, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[12]  P. Savage,et al.  Cardiovascular disease in older adults with glucose disorders: comparison of American Diabetes Association criteria for diabetes mellitus with WHO criteria , 1999, The Lancet.