Having the right neighbors: how tree species diversity modulates drought impacts on forests.

Droughts are a rising concern for terrestrial ecosystems, particularly for forests where drought-induced reductions in tree growth and survival are reported. Biodiversity has long been acknowledged as an important component modulating ecosystem functions, including mitigating their vulnerability to climate-related stresses. Yet the impact of tree diversity on forest vulnerability to drought is unclear. In this review, consistent mechanisms are identified by which tree diversity could reduce vulnerability to drought and emerging evidence is revealed that tree diversity is not systematically positively related to drought resistance in forests. A path is suggested to further increase our knowledge on this subject in the face of climate change, proposing standardization of methods to quantitatively establish diversity impacts on the drought resistance of forests.

[1]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Resistance of European tree species to drought stress in mixed versus pure forests: evidence of stress release by inter-specific facilitation. , 2013, Plant biology.

[2]  F. Lebourgeois,et al.  Mixed stands reduce Abies alba tree-ring sensitivity to summer drought in the Vosges mountains, western Europe , 2013 .

[3]  B. Muys,et al.  orum novel comparative research platform designed to determine the unctional significance of tree species diversity in European forests , 2013 .

[4]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.

[5]  J. Fox.  Interpreting the 'selection effect' of biodiversity on ecosystem function , 2005 .

[6]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Evaluating theories of drought-induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel-experiment framework. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[7]  Filippo Bussotti,et al.  Interspecific competition influences the response of oak transpiration to increasing drought stress in a mixed Mediterranean forest , 2014 .

[8]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Temporal variation of competition and facilitation in mixed species forests in Central Europe. , 2014, Plant biology.

[9]  E. Schulze,et al.  Site‐adapted admixed tree species reduce drought susceptibility of mature European beech , 2016, Global change biology.

[10]  C. Nock,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relations in European forests depend on environmental context. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[11]  Dirk Hölscher,et al.  Tree water uptake in a tropical plantation varying in tree diversity: interspecific differences, seasonal shifts and complementarity , 2015 .

[12]  N. McDowell,et al.  Prolonged warming and drought modify belowground interactions for water among coexisting plants , 2018, Tree physiology.

[13]  N. McDowell,et al.  Responses of two semiarid conifer tree species to reduced precipitation and warming reveal new perspectives for stomatal regulation. , 2016, Plant, cell & environment.

[14]  A. Granier,et al.  Does Drought Influence the Relationship Between Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning in Boreal Forests? , 2014, Ecosystems.

[15]  L. Schwendenmann,et al.  Tree diversity enhances tree transpiration in a Panamanian forest plantation , 2012 .

[16]  S. Condés,et al.  Climate modifies tree interactions in terms of basal area growth and mortality in monospecific and mixed Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris forests , 2015, European Journal of Forest Research.

[17]  A. Lehtonen,et al.  Functional diversity underlies demographic responses to environmental variation in European forests , 2016 .

[18]  R. T. Belote,et al.  Forest productivity and tree diversity relationships depend on ecological context within mid-Atlantic and Appalachian forests (USA) , 2011 .

[19]  D. Forrester,et al.  Enhanced water use efficiency in a mixed Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii plantation. , 2010 .

[20]  N. McDowell,et al.  Warming combined with more extreme precipitation regimes modifies the water sources used by trees. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[21]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes , 2015, Nature.

[22]  Olivier Bouriaud,et al.  Tree diversity does not always improve resistance of forest ecosystems to drought , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  C. Leuschner,et al.  Species diversity and identity effects on the water consumption of tree sapling assemblages under ample and limited water supply , 2016 .

[24]  Patrick Vallet,et al.  Effects of stand composition and tree size on resistance and resilience to drought in sessile oak and Scots pine , 2015 .

[25]  S. Collins,et al.  Responses to chronic N fertilization of ectomycorrhizal piñon but not arbuscular mycorrhizal juniper in a piñon-juniper woodland , 2010 .

[26]  Damien Bonal,et al.  Evidence of hydraulic lift in a young beech and oak mixed forest using 18O soil water labelling , 2011, Trees.

[27]  M. Pardos,et al.  Interannual variability in competitive effects in mixed and monospecific forests of Mediterranean stone pine , 2015 .

[28]  A. Granier,et al.  Drought responses by individual tree species are not often correlated with tree species diversity in European forests , 2016 .

[29]  H. Jactel,et al.  Tree species composition rather than diversity triggers associational resistance to the pine processionary moth , 2014 .

[30]  J. Bauhus,et al.  Know Your Neighbours: Drought Response of Norway Spruce, Silver Fir and Douglas Fir in Mixed Forests Depends on Species Identity and Diversity of Tree Neighbourhoods , 2018, Ecosystems.

[31]  Olivier Bouriaud,et al.  Climate modulates the effects of tree diversity on forest productivity , 2016 .

[32]  A. Gazol,et al.  Functional diversity enhances silver fir growth resilience to an extreme drought , 2016 .

[33]  J. Bauhus,et al.  Potential of forest thinning to mitigate drought stress: A meta-analysis , 2016 .

[34]  D. Coomes,et al.  Detecting the fingerprint of drought across Europe’s forests: do carbon isotope ratios and stem growth rates tell similar stories? , 2017, Forest Ecosystems.

[35]  D. Hooper.  THE ROLE OF COMPLEMENTARITY AND COMPETITION IN ECOSYSTEM RESPONSES TO VARIATION IN PLANT DIVERSITY , 1998 .

[36]  C. Ammer.  Diversity and forest productivity in a changing climate. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[37]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[38]  Harald Bugmann,et al.  Tree species richness promotes productivity in temperate forests through strong complementarity between species. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[39]  D. Kramer.  The possible role of transfer cells in the adaptation of plants to salinity , 1983 .

[40]  C. Messier,et al.  Climate Change Could Negate Positive Tree Diversity Effects on Forest Productivity: A Study Across Five Climate Types in Spain and Canada , 2017, Ecosystems.

[41]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances , 2000 .

[42]  Olivier Bouriaud,et al.  Competition for light and water play contrasting roles in driving diversity–productivity relationships in Iberian forests , 2014 .

[43]  A. Granier,et al.  Mixing oak and pine trees does not improve the functional response to severe drought in central French forests , 2017, Annals of Forest Science.

[44]  J. Bauhus,et al.  A Review of Processes Behind Diversity—Productivity Relationships in Forests , 2016, Current Forestry Reports.

[45]  Nate G. McDowell,et al.  On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene , 2015 .

[46]  H. Jactel,et al.  Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[47]  D. Tilman,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning , 2014 .

[48]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  Water release through plant roots: new insights into its consequences at the plant and ecosystem level. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[49]  W. Bond,et al.  Diverse functional responses to drought in a Mediterranean-type shrubland in South Africa. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[50]  Friedrich Engels,et al.  Survival of Norway spruce remains higher in mixed stands under a dryer and warmer climate , 2015, Global change biology.

[51]  Christian S. Zang,et al.  Size-dependent responses to summer drought in Scots pine, Norway spruce and common oak , 2012, Trees.

[52]  B. Courbaud,et al.  Species mixture increases the effect of drought on tree ring density, but not on ring width, in Quercus petraea Pinus sylvestris stands , 2015 .

[53]  Influence of species interactions on transpiration of Mediterranean tree species during a summer drought , 2015, European Journal of Forest Research.

[54]  P. Jones,et al.  Global warming and changes in drought , 2014 .

[55]  R. Callaway,et al.  Positive interactions among plants , 1995, The Botanical Review.

[56]  P. Barnes,et al.  Soil moisture redistribution as a mechanism of facilitation in savanna tree–shrub clusters , 2005, Oecologia.

[57]  D. Bonal,et al.  Interactive effects of competition and water availability on above- and below-ground growth and functional traits of European beech at juvenile level , 2016 .

[58]  Juan A. Blanco,et al.  Tree‐to‐tree competition in mixed European beech–Scots pine forests has different impacts on growth and water‐use efficiency depending on site conditions , 2018 .

[59]  European beech grows better and is less drought sensitive in mixed than in pure stands: tree neighbourhood effects on radial increment , 2014, Trees.