Radiologist variability in assessing the position of the cavoatrial junction on chest radiographs.

OBJECTIVE To assess the variability in identifying the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) on chest X-rays (CXRs) amongst radiologists. METHODS 23 radiologists (13 consultants and 10 trainees) assessed 25 posteroanterior erect CXRs (including 8 duplicates) and marked the positions of the CAJ. Differences in the CAJ position both within and between observers were evaluated and reported as limits of agreement (LOA), repeatability coefficients (RCs) and intraclass correlation coefficients and were displayed graphically with Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS The mean difference for within-observer assessments was -0.2 cm (95% LOA, -1.5 to +1.1 cm) and between observers, it was -0.3 cm (95% LOA, -2.5 to +1.8 cm). Intraobserver RCs were marginally lower for consultants than for trainees (1.1 vs 1.5). RCs between observers were comparable (2.1 vs 2.2) for consultants and trainees, respectively. CONCLUSION This study detected a large interobserver variability of the CAJ position (up to 4.3 cm). This is a significant finding considering that the length of the superior vena cava is reported to be approximately 7 cm. We conclude that there is poor consensus regarding the CAJ position amongst radiologists. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE No comparisons exist between radiologists in determining CAJ position from CXRs. This report provides evidence of the large observer variability amongst radiologists and adds to the discussion regarding the use of CXRs in validating catheter tip location systems.

[1]  C. M. Jones,et al.  Imaging of the complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters. , 2009, Clinical radiology.

[2]  A. Schlesinger,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver variations in sonographic renal length measurements in children. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  J. Cardella,et al.  Interventional radiologic placement of peripherally inserted central catheters. , 1993, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology.

[4]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[5]  R. Macfadyen,et al.  Assessment of distal tip position of long-term central venous feeding catheters using transesophageal echocardiology. , 2001, JPEN - Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

[6]  M. Borzatta,et al.  Peripherally inserted central catheters: a report of 2506 catheter days. , 1995, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[7]  J. Heffner,et al.  MRI of central venous anatomy: implications for central venous catheter insertion. , 1998, Chest.

[8]  G. Scoppettuolo,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of three different types of Valved and Non-Valved Peripherally inserted Central Catheters , 2014, The journal of vascular access.

[9]  G. Hoffman,et al.  Use of peripherally inserted central catheters in the management of recalcitrant maxillofacial infection. , 2008, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[10]  J. Ryan,et al.  Cardiac Tamponade from Central Venous Catheters Report of a Case and Review of the English Literature , 1984, Angiology.

[11]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[12]  J. Raj,et al.  Blind placements of peripherally inserted antecubital central catheters: initial catheter tip position in relation to carina. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  T. See,et al.  Evaluation of the Sherlock 3CG Tip Confirmation System on peripherally inserted central catheter malposition rates , 2014, Anaesthesia.

[14]  J. D. Armstrong,et al.  Perforation of the great vessels during central venous line placement. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  M K Markey,et al.  The reliability of measuring physical characteristics of spiculated masses on mammography. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  A. Bodenham,et al.  Safe placement of central venous catheters: where should the tip of the catheter lie? , 2000, British journal of anaesthesia.

[17]  M. Battin,et al.  Variation in identifying neonatal percutaneous central venous line position , 2004, Journal of paediatrics and child health.

[18]  R. Mucelli,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstructions of carotid bifurcation from CT images: evaluation of different rendering methods , 2004, European Radiology.

[19]  T. Vesely.  Central venous catheter tip position: a continuing controversy. , 2003, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[20]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Radiation doses from venous access procedures. , 2006, Radiology.

[22]  Ronir Raggio Luiz,et al.  More than one statistical strategy to assess agreement of quantitative measurements may usefully be reported. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  V. Lelkes,et al.  Analysis of the Sherlock II tip location system for inserting peripherally inserted central venous catheters. , 2013, Clinical imaging.

[24]  A. Greca.  Evaluation Techniques of the PICC Tip Placement , 2014 .

[25]  G. Scoppettuolo,et al.  The EKG Method for Positioning the Tip of PICCs: Results from Two Preliminary Studies , 2008 .

[26]  J. Steenbeck,et al.  Is traditional reading of the bedside chest radiograph appropriate to detect intraatrial central venous catheter position? , 2008, Chest.

[27]  R. Young,et al.  Efficacy of the CathRite system to guide bedside placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in critically ill patients: a pilot study. , 2007, Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine.