Dashed expectations in service experiences. Effects of robots human-likeness on customers’ responses

Purpose There is growing interest in the use of human-like social robots, able to undertake complex tasks whilst building consumer engagement. However, further exploration is needed on the optimal level of humanoid appearance for service robots. In particular, the literature is limited with respect to mitigating disconfirmed expectations for robots high in human-likeness. This paper aims to address this gap by testing the effect of robot appearance, disconfirmed expectations and warmth (vs competence) on customers’ responses. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a mixed-method design by presenting a focus group (Study 1) that guides two laboratory experiments (Studies 2 and 3). Studies 2 and 3 test for the moderating effect of warmth (vs competence) and the mediating roles of perceived eeriness and disconfirmed expectations. Findings The findings show that a robot high (vs low) in human-likeness leads to higher negative customers’ responses, which is explained by disconfirmed expectations rather than perceived eeriness. However, when customers interact with a warm (vs competent) robot high in human-likeness, this negative effect vanishes. Research limitations/implications The paper investigates boundary conditions and underlying mechanisms that affect customers’ experiences. Although the study adopts high realistic experiments, a limitation lies in not measuring customers’ actual behaviours in the field. Practical implications This study provides new insights on how the appearance and characteristics of social robots influence the consumers’ experience. By doing so, this study offers managers actionable insights (i.e. enhancing warmth) to lessen the risk of disconfirmed expectations. Originality/value The paper offers new explanations as to why human-like robots can generate negative responses from customers. Moving beyond the “uncanny valley” hypothesis, this study shows the key role of disconfirmed expectations in explaining consumers’ negative responses towards humanoid robots. Moreover, it sheds light on the moderating role of warmth (vs competence), which can mitigate such negative effects.

[1]  Jenny van Doorn,et al.  Robots do not judge: service robots can alleviate embarrassment in service encounters , 2022, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[2]  Markus Appel,et al.  Human-Like Robots and the Uncanny Valley , 2022, Zeitschrift für Psychologie.

[3]  L. Wan,et al.  Friendly or competent? The effects of perception of robot appearance and service context on usage intention , 2022, Annals of Tourism Research.

[4]  Youjae Yi,et al.  The impact of self‐service versus interpersonal contact on customer–brand relationship in the time of frontline technology infusion , 2021, Psychology & Marketing.

[5]  C. Tsai,et al.  Use of service robots in an event setting: Understanding the role of social presence, eeriness, and identity threat , 2021, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management.

[6]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Can a social robot be too warm or too competent? Older Chinese adults' perceptions of social robots and vulnerabilities , 2021, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  G. Viglia,et al.  How to design good experiments in marketing: Types, examples, and methods , 2021, Industrial Marketing Management.

[8]  P. Patterson,et al.  Customer acceptance of frontline service robots in retail banking: A qualitative approach , 2021, Journal of Service Management.

[9]  D. Mahr,et al.  The service triad: an empirical study of service robots, customers and frontline employees , 2021, Journal of Service Management.

[10]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Service Robots, Agency, and Embarrassing Service Encounters , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  Sandrine Prom Tep,et al.  Creepiness: Its antecedents and impact on loyalty when interacting with a chatbot , 2021, Psychology & Marketing.

[12]  C. Flavián,et al.  Examining the effects of robots' physical appearance, warmth, and competence in frontline services: The Humanness‐Value‐Loyalty model , 2021, Psychology & Marketing.

[13]  Magnus Söderlund,et al.  The robot-to-robot service encounter: an examination of the impact of inter-robot warmth , 2021, Journal of Services Marketing.

[14]  A. Mattila,et al.  The Value of Service Robots from the Hotel Guest’s Perspective: A Mixed-Method Approach , 2021 .

[15]  K. Ruyter,et al.  Key trends in business-to-business services marketing strategies: Developing a practice-based research agenda , 2021, Industrial Marketing Management.

[16]  Emily C. Collins,et al.  The effect of social-cognitive recovery strategies on likability, capability and trust in social robots , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  D. Acemoglu,et al.  Demographics and Automation , 2018, The Review of Economic Studies.

[18]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Social robots are like real people: First impressions, attributes, and stereotyping of social robots. , 2020 .

[19]  Stefano Puntoni,et al.  Consumers and Artificial Intelligence: An Experiential Perspective , 2020, Journal of Marketing.

[20]  G. Viglia,et al.  Customers’ Willingness to Disclose Personal Information throughout the Customer Purchase Journey in Retailing: The Role of Perceived Warmth , 2020, Journal of Retailing.

[21]  D. Gursoy,et al.  An examination of interactive effects of employees’ warmth and competence and service failure types on customer’s service recovery cooperation intention , 2020 .

[22]  Ronan de Kervenoael,et al.  Leveraging human-robot interaction in hospitality services: Incorporating the role of perceived value, empathy, and information sharing into visitors’ intentions to use social robots , 2020 .

[23]  Iis P. Tussyadiah,et al.  Applications and Implications of Service Robots in Hospitality , 2020 .

[24]  Mathew B. Chylinski,et al.  Augmented Reality Marketing: A Technology-Enabled Approach to Situated Customer Experience , 2020, Australasian Marketing Journal.

[25]  Sejin Ha,et al.  The effects of warmth-oriented and competence-oriented service recovery messages on observers on online platforms , 2020 .

[26]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Service robots, customers and service employees: what can we learn from the academic literature and where are the gaps? , 2020, Journal of Service Theory and Practice.

[27]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Effects of robot-human versus robot-robot behavior and entitativity on anthropomorphism and willingness to interact , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  What a Pity, Pepper!: How Warmth in Robots' Language Impacts Reactions to Errors during a Collaborative Task , 2020, HRI.

[29]  C. Flavián,et al.  Robots or frontline employees? Exploring customers’ attributions of responsibility and stability after service failure or success , 2020, Journal of Service Management.

[30]  Iis P. Tussyadiah A review of research into automation in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Tourism , 2020, Annals of Tourism Research.

[31]  Margaret K Hogg,et al.  Self–object relationships in consumers’ spontaneous metaphors of anthropomorphism, zoomorphism, and dehumanization , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[32]  Iis P. Tussyadiah,et al.  Do travelers trust intelligent service robots? , 2020 .

[33]  A. Diamantopoulos,et al.  Universal dimensions of individuals' perception: Revisiting the operationalization of warmth and competence with a mixed-method approach , 2020 .

[34]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Engaged to a Robot? The Role of AI in Service , 2020, Journal of Service Research.

[35]  Mathew B. Chylinski,et al.  Empathy and Delight in a Personal Service Setting * , 2020 .

[36]  Sara Dolnicar,et al.  A review of experiments in tourism and hospitality , 2020, Annals of Tourism Research.

[37]  Alexandre Bernardino,et al.  Robotic Versus Human Coaches for Active Aging: An Automated Social Presence Perspective , 2019, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[38]  Martina Mara,et al.  The uncanny of mind in a machine: Humanoid robots as tools, agents, and experiencers , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  Youngjoon Choi,et al.  Service robots in hotels: understanding the service quality perceptions of human-robot interaction , 2019, Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management.

[40]  Carlos Flavián,et al.  Service robot implementation: a theoretical framework and research agenda , 2019, The Service Industries Journal.

[41]  S. Lee,et al.  Anthropomorphism and its implications for advertising hotel brands , 2019 .

[42]  Mathew B. Chylinski,et al.  Seeing eye to eye: social augmented reality and shared decision making in the marketplace , 2019, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[43]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Trust in humanoid robots: implications for services marketing , 2019, Journal of Services Marketing.

[44]  Dominik Mahr,et al.  Value of social robots in services: social cognition perspective , 2019, Journal of Services Marketing.

[45]  Julia A. Minson,et al.  Communicating with Warmth in Distributive Negotiations Is Surprisingly Counterproductive , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Consumers and Technology in a Changing World , 2019 .

[47]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Great Expectations? Relation of Previous Experiences With Social Robots in Real Life or in the Media and Expectancies Based on Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[48]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Service Robots Rising: How Humanoid Robots Influence Service Experiences and Elicit Compensatory Consumer Responses , 2019, Journal of Marketing Research.

[49]  Stefanie Paluch,et al.  Service Robots: Drivers of Perceived Responsibility for Service Outcomes , 2019, Journal of Service Research.

[50]  L. Altınay,et al.  Consumer engagement in the tourism industry: new trends and implications for research , 2019, The Service Industries Journal.

[51]  Jan H. Schumann,et al.  Paying Before or Paying After? Timing and Uncertainty in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing , 2019, Journal of Service Research.

[52]  D. Dalli,et al.  When empathy prevents negative reviewing behavior , 2019, Annals of Tourism Research.

[53]  Nadia Magnenat Thalmann,et al.  Eliza in the uncanny valley: anthropomorphizing consumer robots increases their perceived warmth but decreases liking , 2019, Marketing Letters.

[54]  Ulrike Gretzel,et al.  Marketing robot services in hospitality and tourism: the role of anthropomorphism , 2019, Future of Tourism Marketing.

[55]  Markus Appel,et al.  Are robots becoming unpopular? Changes in attitudes towards autonomous robotic systems in Europe , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[56]  Ym Tang,et al.  Comprehending products with mixed reality , 2018 .

[57]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Brave new world: service robots in the frontline , 2018, Journal of Service Management.

[58]  Lerzan Aksoy,et al.  Future scenarios of the collaborative economy , 2018, Journal of Service Management.

[59]  Theo Araujo,et al.  Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[60]  Vincent Wing Sun Tung,et al.  Exploring customer experiences with robotics in hospitality , 2018, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.

[61]  D. Mahr,et al.  Service robots: value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks , 2018 .

[62]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Service , 2018 .

[63]  Iis P. Tussyadiah,et al.  Consumer Evaluation of Hotel Service Robots , 2018, ENTER.

[64]  G. Metta,et al.  Robots As Intentional Agents: Using Neuroscientific Methods to Make Robots Appear More Social , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[65]  S. Benoit,et al.  Linking service convenience to satisfaction: dimensions and key moderators , 2017 .

[66]  Robert Winter,et al.  Service robots in hospitals: new perspectives on niche evolution and technology affordances , 2017, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Malte F. Jung,et al.  Understanding the Uncanny: Both Atypical Features and Category Ambiguity Provoke Aversion toward Humanlike Robots , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[68]  Leonard Lee,et al.  Keeping It Real in Experimental Research—Understanding When, Where, and How to Enhance Realism and Measure Consumer Behavior , 2017 .

[69]  T. Keiningham,et al.  The interplay of customer experience and commitment , 2017 .

[70]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto , 2017 .

[71]  Rebecca W. Hamilton,et al.  Doing Well versus Doing Good: The Differential Effect of Underdog Positioning on Moral and Competent Service Providers , 2017 .

[72]  Paul Michelman,et al.  18 The Jobs That Artificial Intelligence Will Create , 2017 .

[73]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Measuring the Uncanny Valley Effect , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[74]  Anna S. Mattila,et al.  Does anthropomorphism influence customers’ switching intentions in the self-service technology failure context? , 2016 .

[75]  J. Wieseke,et al.  When Do Customers Get What They Expect? Understanding the Ambivalent Effects of Customers’ Service Expectations on Satisfaction , 2016 .

[76]  S. Goodman,et al.  Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations , 2016, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[77]  Ross A. Knepper,et al.  Human expectations of social robots , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[78]  P. Rochat,et al.  The Uncanny Valley: Existence and Explanations , 2015 .

[79]  Truong-Huy D. Nguyen,et al.  Modeling Warmth and Competence in Virtual Characters , 2015, IVA.

[80]  B. Ivens,et al.  On the Role of Brand Stereotypes in Shaping Consumer Response toward Brands: An Empirical Examination of Direct and Mediating Effects of Warmth and Competence , 2015 .

[81]  Markus Appel,et al.  Science fiction reduces the eeriness of android robots: A field experiment , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[82]  J. Kätsyri,et al.  A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[83]  N. Epley,et al.  The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle , 2014 .

[84]  Jana Möller,et al.  Shaping retail brand personality perceptions by bodily experiences , 2013 .

[85]  Rebecca Q. Stafford,et al.  Robots with Display Screens: A Robot with a More Humanlike Face Display Is Perceived To Have More Mind and a Better Personality , 2013, PloS one.

[86]  R. Yin Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations , 2013 .

[87]  Christophe Ley,et al.  Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median , 2013 .

[88]  K. Keeling,et al.  A Re-Examination of Value Co-creation in the Age of Interactive Service Robots: A Service Dominant Logic Perspective , 2013 .

[89]  Mohammed Slim Ben Mimoun,et al.  Case study—Embodied virtual agents: An analysis on reasons for failure , 2012 .

[90]  D. Wegner,et al.  Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley , 2012, Cognition.

[91]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  A Second Chance to Make a First Impression? How Appearance and Nonverbal Behavior Affect Perceived Warmth and Competence of Virtual Agents over Time , 2012, IVA.

[92]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  The Uncanny Valley [From the Field] , 2012, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[93]  Jennifer Aaker,et al.  Cultivating Admiration in Brands: Warmth, Competence, and Landing in the 'Golden Quadrant' , 2011 .

[94]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Evaluating Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[95]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[96]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  Design dimensions of experience rooms for service test drives : case studies in several service contexts , 2010 .

[97]  K. Vohs,et al.  Non-Profits are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter , 2010 .

[98]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[99]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  WHEN WE NEED A HUMAN: MOTIVATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF ANTHROPOMORPHISM , 2008 .

[100]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot–like Agent , 2008 .

[101]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Warmth and Competence As Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map , 2008 .

[102]  P. Aggarwal,et al.  Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products , 2007 .

[103]  A. Abele,et al.  Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[104]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[105]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[106]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[107]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research , 2006 .

[108]  Peter McGoldrick,et al.  On‐screen characters: their design and influence on consumer trust , 2006 .

[109]  C. Judd,et al.  Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[110]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[111]  K. Reynolds,et al.  Hedonic shopping motivations , 2003 .

[112]  W. Kim,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of relationship quality in hotel industry , 2002 .

[113]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[114]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes , 2000 .

[115]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[116]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service , 1993 .

[117]  R. B. Woodruff,et al.  Expectations and Norms in Models of Consumer Satisfaction , 1987 .

[118]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction , 1982 .

[119]  B. Calder Focus Groups and the Nature of Qualitative Marketing Research , 1977 .

[120]  R. Bagozzi Structural Equation Models in Experimental Research , 1977 .

[121]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .