Application of EU Tissue and Cell Directive screening protocols to anonymous oocyte donors in western Ukraine: Data from an Irish IVF programme

Anonymous oocyte donation in the EU proceeds only after rigorous screening designed to ensure gamete safety. If anonymous donor gametes originating from outside EU territory are used by EU patients, donor testing must conform to the same standards as if gamete procurement had occurred in the EU. In Ireland, IVF recipients can be matched to anonymous donors in the Ukraine (a non-EU country). This investigation describes the evolution of anonymous oocyte donor screening methods during this period and associated results. Data were reviewed for all participants in an anonymous donor oocyte IVF programme from 2006 to 2009, when testing consistent with contemporary EU screening requirements was performed on all Ukrainian oocyte donors. HIV and hepatitis tests were aggregated from 314 anonymous oocyte donors and 265 recipients. The results included 5,524 Ukrainian women who were interviewed and 314 of these entered the programme (5.7% accession rate). Mean age of anonymous oocyte donors was 27.9 years; all had achieved at least one delivery. No case of hepatitis or HIV was detected at initial screening or at oocyte procurement. This is the first study of HIV and hepatitis incidence specifically among Ukrainian oocyte donors. We find anonymous oocyte donors to be a low-risk group, despite a high background HIV rate. Following full disclosure of the donation process, most Ukrainian women wishing to volunteer as anonymous oocyte donors do not participate. Current EU screening requirements appear adequate to maintain patient safety in the context of anonymous donor oocyte IVF.

[1]  J. Grifo,et al.  Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in anonymous shared versus exclusive donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  F. Merlet,et al.  Prise en charge du don d'ovocytes: réglementation du don, la face cachée du tourisme procréatif , 2010 .

[3]  S. N. Covington,et al.  Demographic variables related to successful anonymous oocyte donor recruitment. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[4]  B. Sénémaud,et al.  [Egg donation: regulation of the donation and the hidden face of the cross-border reproductive care]. , 2010, Gynecologie, obstetrique & fertilite.

[5]  A. P. Walsh,et al.  Blastocyst transfer for multiple prior IVF failure: a five year descriptive study. , 2009, Irish medical journal.

[6]  M. Afnan,et al.  Prognosis of oocyte donation cycles: a prospective comparison of the in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles of recipients who used shared oocytes versus those who used altruistic donors. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  S. Murphy,et al.  Determining the status of non-transferred embryos in Ireland: a conspectus of case law and implications for clinical IVF practice , 2009, Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM.

[8]  A. P. Walsh,et al.  Clinical features and reproductive outcomes for embryos undergoing dual freeze-thaw sequences followed by blastocyst transfer: critique of 14 consecutive cases in IVF. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  T. Murphy Ethics and the prohibition of donor gametes in fertility medicine. , 2009, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[10]  S. Brett,et al.  Can we improve recruitment of oocyte donors with loss of donor anonymity? A hospital-based survey , 2008, Human fertility.

[11]  O. Coll,et al.  Prognostic factors in oocyte donation: an analysis through egg-sharing recipient pairs showing a discordant outcome. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  Keith Lg,et al.  Medical tourism and reproductive outsourcing: the dawning of a new paradigm for healthcare. , 2006 .

[13]  L. Keith,et al.  Medical tourism and reproductive outsourcing: the dawning of a new paradigm for healthcare. , 2006, International journal of fertility and women's medicine.

[14]  E. Blyth Patient experiences of an "egg sharing" programme , 2004, Human fertility.

[15]  E. Fortescue Gamete donation - where is the evidence that there are benefits in removing the anonymity of donors? A patient's viewpoint. , 2003, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[16]  A. Verhoeff,et al.  Results of decentralized in-vitro fertilization treatment with transport and satellite clinics. , 1995, Human reproduction.