Impact of State Ignition Interlock Laws on Alcohol-Involved Crash Deaths in the United States.

OBJECTIVES To investigate the impact on alcohol-involved crash deaths of universal ignition interlock requirements, which aim to prevent people convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol from driving while intoxicated. METHODS We used data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for 1999 to 2013. From 2004 to 2013, 18 states made interlocks mandatory for all drunk-driving convictions. We compared alcohol-involved crash deaths between 18 states with and 32 states without universal interlock requirements, accounting for state and year effects, and for clustering within states. RESULTS Policy impact was apparent 3 years after implementation. The adjusted rate of alcohol-involved crash deaths was 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.0, 5.4) per 100,000 in states with the universal interlock requirement, compared with 5.5 (95% CI = 5.48, 5.53) in states without, an absolute reduction of 0.8 (95% CI = 0.1, 1.5) deaths per 100,000 per year. CONCLUSIONS Requiring ignition interlocks for all drunk-driving convictions was associated with 15% fewer alcohol-involved crash deaths, compared with states with less-stringent requirements. Interlocks are a life-saving technology that merit wider use.

[1]  G. Larkin,et al.  Effectiveness of ignition interlock devices in reducing drunk driving recidivism. , 1999, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  N. Bellamy,et al.  Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  A. Getis.  The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics , 2010 .

[4]  M. Harhay,et al.  The effects of federal parity on substance use disorder treatment. , 2013, The American journal of managed care.

[5]  A. Lund,et al.  Contribution of Alcohol-Impaired Driving to Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths in 2010 , 2007 .

[6]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[7]  A. Epstein.  Effects of report cards on referral patterns to cardiac surgeons. , 2010, Journal of health economics.

[8]  David J DeYoung.  An evaluation of the implementation of ignition interlock in California. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[9]  D. Silver,et al.  Diffusion of Impaired Driving Laws Among US States. , 2015, American journal of public health.

[10]  J. Butler.  2017 ASTHO President's Challenge: Public Health Approaches to Preventing Substance Misuse and Addiction , 2017, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[11]  Bo Bjerre.  Primary and secondary prevention of drink driving by the use of alcolock device and program: Swedish experiences. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  A. Wagenaar,et al.  Effects of drivers' license suspension policies on alcohol-related crash involvement: long-term follow-up in forty-six states. , 2007, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[13]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Attitudes Toward In-Vehicle Advanced Alcohol Detection Technology , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.

[14]  Randy W. Elder,et al.  Effectiveness of ignition interlocks for preventing alcohol-impaired driving and alcohol-related crashes: a Community Guide systematic review. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  James Hedlund,et al.  State Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Testing and Reporting for Drivers Involved in Fatal Crashes: Current Practices, Results, and Strategies, 1997-2009 , 2012 .

[16]  P. Gruenewald,et al.  A new scale of the U.S. alcohol policy environment and its relationship to binge drinking. , 2014, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  A. Williams,et al.  Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: a randomized trial in Maryland. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[18]  D. Heitjan,et al.  Sensitivity of the hazard ratio to nonignorable treatment assignment in an observational study , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  J. Rupp,et al.  Modeling the injury prevention impact of mandatory alcohol ignition interlock installation in all new US vehicles. , 2015, American journal of public health.

[20]  Robert S. Thompson,et al.  Effectiveness of Sobriety Checkpoints for Reducing Alcohol-Involved Crashes , 2002 .

[21]  Christopher F. Baum,et al.  Multivariate portmanteau (Q) test for white noise , 2001 .

[22]  F. Sloan,et al.  Alcohol‐Impaired Driving and Perceived Risks of Legal Consequences , 2017, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[23]  A. McCartt,et al.  Observational study of the extent of driving while suspended for alcohol impaired driving , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[24]  H L Ross,et al.  Effects of license revocation on drunk-driving offenders. , 1988, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  A. Neugut,et al.  Survival Associated with 5-FluorouracilBased Adjuvant Chemotherapy among Elderly Patients with Node-Positive Colon Cancer , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  Bruce D. Meyer.  Natural and Quasi- Experiments in Economics , 1994 .

[27]  Brian N Fildes,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis of an Alcohol Ignition Interlock for Installation in all Newly Registered Vehicles , 2009, Traffic injury prevention.

[28]  Richard Roth,et al.  Interlocks for First Offenders: Effective? , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[29]  R B Voas,et al.  Evaluation of a method for reducing unlicensed driving: the Washington and Oregon license plate sticker laws. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.