Proposed prognostic score for breast carcinoma on fine needle aspiration based on nuclear grade, cellular dyscohesion and bare atypical nuclei

Fine needle aspiration is an established diagnostic tool in breast carcinoma. Although the potential of using the same diagnostic aspirate material to provide additional cytomorphologic prognostic or predictive information has been investigated, no well‐recognized, practical grading system has been established. Such system is necessary in guiding treatment, monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy effect and predicting outcome. We herein propose a new grading system, combining nuclear grade, cellular dyscohesion, and bare atypical nuclei to arrive at one cytoprognostic score. Cytoprognostic scores were compared with other known prognostic factors. Fine needle aspirations of breast diagnosed as adenocarcinoma from 55 patients were reviewed. The cytoprognostic score combined three features including nuclear grade (score 1–3), cellular dyscohesion (score 1–3), and bare atypical nuclei (score 0, 1). A cytoprognostic score of 3 and below was considered a low score, and a score of 4–7 was considered a high score. The cytoprognostic score was then compared to histologic grade, lymph node status, and expressions of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Her2‐Neu, Ki‐67, and p53 in the subsequently excised tumor. A low cytoprognostic score predicted a low to intermediate grade carcinoma and a high score predicted an intermediate to high‐grade carcinoma. A high cytoprognostic score also correlated with more positive lymph node metastasis, and poor expression of prognostic markers. In conclusion, cytoprognostic score is performed with ease and shows a great promise as a cost‐effective way to predict biological behavior of breast carcinoma and guide clinical management. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2006;34:542–546. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Proceedings of the consensus conference on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in carcinoma of the breast, April 26-28, 2003, Philadelphia, PA. , 2004, Human pathology.

[2]  G. Birdsong,et al.  Cellular dyscohesion in fine-needle aspiration of breast carcinoma. Prognostic indicator for axillary lymph node metastases? , 2001, American journal of clinical pathology.

[3]  Ichiro Mori,et al.  Cytologic Grading of Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2000, Acta Cytologica.

[4]  S. Edge,et al.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer , 2005 .

[5]  D. D. De Frias,et al.  Tumor cell (dys)cohesion as a prognostic factor in aspirate smears of breast carcinoma. , 1998, American journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  M. Kissin,et al.  Typing and grading breast carcinoma on fine‐needle aspiration: Is this clinically useful information? , 1995, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[7]  J. Silverman,et al.  Prognostic factors from the fine‐needle aspirate: Breast carcinoma nuclear grade , 1994, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[8]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Prognostic value of cytological grading of fine-needle aspirates from breast carcinomas , 1994, The Lancet.

[9]  L. Howell,et al.  Application of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson tumor grading system to fine-needle aspirates of the breast. , 1994, American journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  G. Birdsong,et al.  Breast fine needle aspiration cytology. Utility as a screening tool for clinically palpable lesions. , 1993, Acta cytologica.

[11]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Prognostic value of breast cancer cytologic grading: A retrospective study of 213 cases , 1993, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[12]  N. Sneige Fine‐needle aspiration of the breast: A review of 1,995 cases with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls , 1993, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[13]  R. Blamey,et al.  Cytological grading of breast carcinoma—a feasible proposition? , 1990, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[14]  W. Frable Needle aspiration biopsy: past, present, and future. , 1989, Human pathology.

[15]  E. Mallon,et al.  Semiquantitative analyses of fine needle aspirates from benign and malignant breast lesions. , 1989, Journal of clinical pathology.