论文信息 - The Communication Process as Evaluative Context: What Do Nonscientists Hear When Scientists Speak? - 字舞流文

The Communication Process as Evaluative Context: What Do Nonscientists Hear When Scientists Speak?

J. R. Weber | Charlotte SCHELL WORD | JAMES R. WEBER | CHARLOTTE SCHELL WORD | J. Weber

[1] Murray Edelman,et al. Contestable categories and public opinion , 1993 .

[2] M. Polanyi. Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[3] Dorothy Nelkin,et al. 19 Science Controversies The Dynamics of Public Disputes in the United States , 1995 .

[4] Susanna Hornig Priest,et al. Information Equity, Public Understanding of Science, and the Biotechnology Debate , 1995 .

[5] J. Gregory,et al. Science in Public: Communication, Culture and Credibility , 2000 .

[6] William A. Gamson,et al. News as Framing , 1989 .

[7] E. Goffman. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[8] P. Slovic. Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk‐Assessment Battlefield , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9] J. Lubchenco. Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science , 1998 .

[10] Kathy Kellermann. Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic , 1992 .

[11] P. Raven,et al. Ecological Science and the Human Predicament , 1998, Science.

[12] Robert T. Craig. Communication Theory as a Field , 1999 .

[13] M. Siegrist,et al. Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.