Influence of Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte-associated Antigen 4 (CTLA4) Common Polymorphisms on Outcome in Treatment of Melanoma Patients With CTLA-4 Blockade

Blockade of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), a down-regulator of T-cell activation, can cause cancer regression in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, not all patients respond well to the therapy and some develop severe autoimmune reactions. We hypothesized that common genetic variation in the CTLA4 gene could contribute to response to CTLA-4 blockade and the occurrence of autoimmune reactions. We investigated 7 common single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs, (rs733618, rs4553808, rs11571317, rs5742909, rs231775, rs3087243, and rs7565213) in 152 white melanoma patients who received CTLA-4 blockade. Three SNPs were associated with response to therapy: proximal promoter SNPs, rs4553808 [P=0.002; odds ratio (OR) 3.39; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.62-7.10] and rs11571327 (P=0.02; OR 2.89; 95% CI, 1.23-6.83) and the nonsynonymous SNP rs231775 (Thr17Ala, P=0.009; OR 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.82). A haplotype analysis including the 7 SNPs suggested that the common haplotype, TACCGGG could be associated with no response (P=0.02) whereas the haplotype TGCCAGG (P=0.06; OR 4.13; 95% CI, 1.17-14.5) could be associated with response to the treatment. No significant association was observed for occurrence of severe autoimmune reactions (grade III/IV) either by single SNP or haplotype analyses. Our results suggest that genetic variation in CTLA4 could influence response to CTLA-4 blockade therapy in metastatic melanoma patients, but further studies are necessary to confirm the observed associations.

[1]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Autoimmunity correlates with tumor regression in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  S. Gough,et al.  CTLA4 gene polymorphism and autoimmunity , 2005, Immunological reviews.

[3]  S. Groshen,et al.  Autoimmunity in a phase I trial of a fully human anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 monoclonal antibody with multiple melanoma peptides and Montanide ISA 51 for patients with resected stages III and IV melanoma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 Gene and Recovery from Hepatitis B Virus Infection , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[5]  S. Abrams Role of anti-CTLA-4 therapies in the treatment of cancer. , 2004, Current opinion in molecular therapeutics.

[6]  N. Laird,et al.  Estimation and Tests of Haplotype-Environment Interaction when Linkage Phase Is Ambiguous , 2003, Human Heredity.

[7]  Thomas A. Davis,et al.  Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Thomas Davis,et al.  Biologic activity of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 antibody blockade in previously vaccinated metastatic melanoma and ovarian carcinoma patients , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. Pérez-Lezaun,et al.  Association of the CTLA4 promoter region (−1661G allele) with type 1 diabetes in the South Moroccan population , 2003, Genes and Immunity.

[10]  C. Polychronakos,et al.  A Common Autoimmunity Predisposing Signal Peptide Variant of the Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte Antigen 4 Results in Inefficient Glycosylation of the Susceptibility Allele* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  R. Giscombe,et al.  A CTLA-4 gene polymorphism at position −318 in the promoter region affects the expression of protein , 2002, Genes and Immunity.

[12]  D. Schaid,et al.  Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  Frank Dudbridge,et al.  Haplotype tagging for the identification of common disease genes , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[14]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[15]  Nick Orr,et al.  Common genetic variation and human disease. , 2008, Advances in genetics.

[16]  Brian Staats,et al.  SNP500Cancer: a public resource for sequence validation and assay development for genetic variation in candidate genes , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  S Rozen,et al.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. , 2000, Methods in molecular biology.