Reading, writing, publishing, and publicly presenting scientific works are vital for a young researcher's profile building and career development. Generally, the traditional educational curricula do not offer training possibilities to learn and practice how to prepare, write, and present scientific works. These are rather a part of lab meeting activities in research groups. The lack of such training is more critical in some developing countries because this adds to the rare opportunities to discuss and become involved in the exchanges on state of the art scientific literature. Here the authors relate their experience in introducing a weekly 1‐day lab meeting in the framework of two previously organized 3‐month courses on “Bioinformatics and Genome Analyses”. The main activities which are developed during these lab meetings include scientific literature follow up as well as preparing and presenting oral and written scientific reviews. These activities prove to be useful for a student's self‐confidence building, for enhancing their active participation during the lectures and practical sessions, as well as for the positive impact on running the whole course program. Incorporation of such lab meeting activities in the course program significantly improves the capacity building of the participants, their analytical and critical reading of scientific literature, as well as communication skills. In this work it is shown how to proceed with the different steps involved in the implementation of lab meeting activities, and to recommend their regular institution in similar courses.
[1]
Michael C. Schatz,et al.
Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single molecule sequencing
,
2017,
Nature Methods.
[2]
Philip E. Bourne,et al.
Ten Simple Rules for Making Good Oral Presentations
,
2007,
PLoS Comput. Biol..
[3]
George M. Church,et al.
Beyond editing to writing large genomes
,
2017,
Nature Reviews Genetics.
[4]
Chuong B. Do,et al.
Access the most recent version at doi: 10.1101/gr.926603 References
,
2003
.
[5]
F. Tekaia.
Inferring Orthologs: Open Questions and Perspectives
,
2016,
Genomics insights.
[6]
Abdellatif Boudabous,et al.
Designing and running an advanced Bioinformatics and genome analyses course in Tunisia
,
2019,
PLoS Comput. Biol..
[7]
Konrad P. Körding,et al.
Ten simple rules for structuring papers
,
2016,
bioRxiv.
[8]
M. Pop,et al.
The Theory and Practice of Genome Sequence Assembly.
,
2015,
Annual review of genomics and human genetics.
[9]
Brian C. Thomas,et al.
A new view of the tree of life
,
2016,
Nature Microbiology.