Toward a positive aging phenotype for older women: observations from the women's health initiative.

BACKGROUND To develop a positive aging phenotype, we undertook analyses to describe multiple dimensions of positive aging and their relationships to one another in women 65 years of age and older and evaluate the performance of individual indicators and composite factors of this phenotype as predictors of time to death, years of healthy living, and years of independent living. METHODS Data from Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study participants ages 65 years and older at baseline, including follow-up observations up to 8 years later, were analyzed using descriptive statistics and principal components analysis to identify the factor structure of a positive aging phenotype. The factors were used to predict time to death, years of healthy living (without hospitalization or diagnosis of a serious health condition), and years of independent living (without nursing home admission or use of special services). RESULTS We identified a multidimensional phenotype of positive aging that included two factors: Physical-Social Functioning and Emotional Functioning. Both factors were predictive of each of the outcomes, but Physical-Social Functioning was the strongest predictor. Each standard deviation of increase in Physical-Social Functioning was accompanied by a 23.7% reduction in mortality risk, a 19.4% reduction in risk of major health conditions or hospitalizations, and a 26.3% reduction in risk of dependent living. CONCLUSIONS Physical-Social Functioning and Emotional Functioning constitute important components of a positive aging phenotype. Physical-Social Functioning was the strongest predictor of outcomes related to positive aging, including years of healthy living, years of independent living, and time to mortality.

[1]  L. Fried,et al.  Education predicts incidence of preclinical mobility disability in initially high-functioning older women. The Women's Health and Aging Study II. , 2011, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[2]  R. Pruchno,et al.  A two-factor model of successful aging. , 2010, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[3]  K. Yaffe,et al.  Defining successful aging: the importance of including cognitive function over time. , 2010, Archives of neurology.

[4]  S. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of maintaining cognitive function in older adults , 2009, Neurology.

[5]  D. Feeny,et al.  Prevalence and factors associated with thriving in older adulthood: a 10-year population-based study. , 2008, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[6]  Tamara B Harris,et al.  A physiologic index of comorbidity: relationship to mortality and disability. , 2008, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[7]  Anne B. Newman,et al.  Weight, Mortality, Years of Healthy Life, and Active Life Expectancy in Older Adults , 2008, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  P. Duberstein,et al.  Personality traits, education, and health-related quality of life among older adult primary care patients. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[9]  G. Ostir,et al.  Measures of lower body function and risk of mortality over 7 years of follow-up. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Lawrence A Palinkas,et al.  Building blocks of successful aging: a focus group study of older adults' perceived contributors to successful aging. , 2007, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[11]  S. Rubin,et al.  Prognostic Value of Usual Gait Speed in Well‐Functioning Older People—Results from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[12]  L. Anderson,et al.  Older Adults' Views of “Successful Aging”—How Do They Compare with Researchers' Definitions? , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  Garnet L Anderson,et al.  The Women's Health Initiative recruitment methods and results. , 2003, Annals of epidemiology.

[14]  Scott Davis,et al.  Implementation of the Women's Health Initiative study design. , 2003, Annals of epidemiology.

[15]  W. Strawbridge,et al.  Successful aging and well-being: self-rated compared with Rowe and Kahn. , 2002, The Gerontologist.

[16]  G. Ostir,et al.  Reliability and sensitivity to change assessed for a summary measure of lower body function: results from the Women's Health and Aging Study. , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  P. Lapuerta,et al.  Change in physical performance over time in older women: the Women's Health and Aging Study. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[18]  J W Rowe,et al.  Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  L. Berkman,et al.  Living arrangements, social integration, and change in functional health status. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[20]  Suzanne G. Leveille,et al.  Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[21]  J. Rowe,et al.  Successful aging. , 1998, Aging.

[22]  G. Marks,et al.  Functional decline in the elderly: Evidence for direct and stress-buffering protective effects of social interactions and physical activity , 1997, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[23]  G. DeFriese,et al.  Predicting mortality from community surveys of older adults: the importance of self-rated functional ability. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[24]  K. Matthews,et al.  Women's health initiative. Why now? What is it? What's new? , 1997, The American psychologist.

[25]  D B Reuben,et al.  The predictive validity of self-report and performance-based measures of function and health. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[26]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[27]  C. Ellison Religious involvement and subjective well-being. , 1991, Journal of health and social behavior.

[28]  H Akiyama,et al.  Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model. , 1987, Journal of gerontology.

[29]  H. Chui,et al.  The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. , 1987, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[30]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[31]  C. Depp,et al.  Definitions and predictors of successful aging: a comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. , 2006, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[32]  Ack,et al.  LOWER-EXTREMITY FUNCTION IN PERSONS OVER THE AGE OF 70 YEARS AS A PREDICTOR OF SUBSEQUENT DISABILITY , 2001 .

[33]  JoAnn E. Manson,et al.  Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women's Health Initiative Study Group. , 1998, Controlled clinical trials.