Male Partner Selectivity, Romantic Confidence, and Media Depictions of Partner Scarcity

An experiment was conducted to explore the effects of exposure to partner scarcity or abundance messages on men's partner selectivity, romantic confidence, and self-assessed attractiveness. Undergraduate male participants watched a soap opera narrative featuring either two men competing over one potential female partner (partner scarcity) or two women competing over one potential male partner (partner abundance). Relative to control subjects, watching either narrative reduced romantic confidence. Experimental condition also affected partner selectivity and self-assessed attractiveness, though both effects were moderated by endorsement of traditional masculine ideology. Viewing the abundance narrative resulted in greater selectivity and self-assessed attractiveness for men high in endorsement of traditional masculinity but diminished selectivity and self-assessed attractiveness for men low in endorsement of traditional masculine identity.

[1]  Bradley J. Bond,et al.  Gaming magazines and the drive for muscularity in preadolescent boys: a longitudinal examination. , 2007, Body image.

[2]  A. Little,et al.  Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex individuals changes self-rated attractiveness and face preferences in women , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  Marrying Up: The Role of Sex Ratio in Assortative Matching , 2011 .

[4]  S. South,et al.  Imbalanced Sex Ratios, Men’s Sexual Behavior, and Risk of Sexually Transmitted Infection in China , 2010, Journal of health and social behavior.

[5]  S. Asch.  Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[6]  Lars Penke,et al.  Why Mate Choices are not as Reciprocal as we Assume: The Role of Personality, Flirting and Physical Attractiveness , 2011 .

[7]  Justin H. Park,et al.  JEALOUSY Sex-specific relationship between digit ratio ( 2 D : 4 D ) and romantic jealousy , 2007 .

[8]  Vernon L. Quinsey,et al.  Sex differences in intra-sex variations in human mating tactics: An evolutionary approach , 1995 .

[9]  Laramie D. Taylor,et al.  The Role of Lad Magazines in Priming Men’s Chronic and Temporary Appearance‐Related Schemata: An Investigation of Longitudinal and Experimental Findings , 2009 .

[10]  Jay C. Wade,et al.  Masculinity Ideology, Male Identity, and Romantic Relationship Quality Among Heterosexual and Gay Men , 2007 .

[11]  D. Watson,et al.  Match makers and deal breakers: analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[12]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Lynda A. King,et al.  Associations of Gender and Gender-Role Ideology With Behavioral and Attitudinal Features of Intimate Partner Aggression. , 2004 .

[14]  M. Krcmar,et al.  Male body image: The role of muscle magazine exposure, body mass index, and social comparison in men’s body satisfaction , 2009 .

[15]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Glenn E. Good,et al.  Italian and American masculinities: A comparison of masculine gender role norms. , 2005 .

[17]  Thomas V Pollet,et al.  Driving a hard bargain: sex ratio and male marriage success in a historical US population , 2008, Biology Letters.

[18]  Christopher D. Watkins,et al.  Individual differences in dominance perception: Dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance , 2010 .

[19]  J. Simpson,et al.  The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  P. Hammerstein,et al.  Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  N. Etcoff,et al.  Survival of the Prettiest: The Science of Beauty , 1999 .

[22]  R. Kurzban,et al.  HurryDate: Mate preferences in action , 2005 .

[23]  E. Hatfield,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Mate Selection Preferences : Gender Differences Examined in a National Sample , 2004 .

[24]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Self-assessments and Mating Decisions How Self-assessments Can Guide Human Mating Decisions , 2022 .

[25]  S. Emlen,et al.  Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  D. Kruger,et al.  Male Scarcity is Differentially Related to Male Marital Likelihood across the Life Course , 2009 .

[27]  L. Ku,et al.  Masculinity Ideology: Its Impact on Adolescent Males' Heterosexual Relationships , 1993 .

[28]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Beauty, Dominance, and the Mating Game: Contrast Effects in Self-Assessment Reflect Gender Differences in Mate Selection , 1999 .

[29]  Laramie D. Taylor,et al.  Cads and Dads on Screen , 2012, Commun. Res..

[30]  Justin H. Park,et al.  Sex-specific relationship between digit ratio (2D:4D) and romantic jealousy , 2008 .

[31]  George Loewenstein,et al.  If I ’ m Not Hot , Are You Hot or Not ? Physical-Attractiveness Evaluations and Dating Preferences as a Function of One ’ s Own Attractiveness , 2008 .

[32]  D. Zillmann,et al.  Costs and benefits of allegiance : changes in fans' self-ascribed competencies after team victory versus defeat , 1992 .

[33]  D. Singh,et al.  Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  D. Kruger,et al.  Female Scarcity Reduces Women's Marital Ages and Increases Variance in Men's Marital Ages , 2010, Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior.

[35]  Christopher D. Watkins,et al.  Cues to the sex ratio of the local population influence women’s preferences for facial symmetry , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  R. Harris,et al.  Autobiographical Memories for Seeing Romantic Movies on a Date: Romance Is Not Just for Women , 2004 .

[37]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Understanding the Role of Entertainment Media in the Sexual Socialization of American Youth: A Review of Empirical Research. , 2003 .

[38]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[39]  B. Cardinal,et al.  Muscle Dysmorphia Symptoms and Their Relationships to Self-concept and Negative Affect Among College Recreational Exercisers , 2009 .

[40]  D. Buss,et al.  Preferences in human mate selection. , 1986 .

[41]  S. Noar,et al.  The Relationship Between Masculinity Ideology, Condom Attitudes, and Condom Use Stage of Change: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach , 2002 .

[42]  C. Sibley,et al.  A Dual Process Motivational Model of Ambivalent Sexism and Gender Differences in Romantic Partner Preferences , 2011 .

[43]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[44]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[45]  Susan Sprecher,et al.  The importance to males and females of physical attractiveness, earning potential, and expressiveness in initial attraction , 1989 .

[46]  N. Pound.  Male interest in visual cues of sperm competition risk , 2002 .

[47]  Justin H. Park,et al.  Height predicts jealousy differently for men and women , 2008 .