Current management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: the role of colony-stimulating factors.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy suppresses the hematopoietic system, impairing host protective mechanisms. One important consequence, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN), places patients at risk of developing fever and life-threatening infections. These complications have substantial economic impact and may severely affect the quality of life of patients undergoing treatment of cancer. Currently, CIN is managed by delaying and reducing chemotherapy treatment with hematopoietic growth factors and with intravenous antibiotic therapy. Reducing chemotherapy may compromise treatment outcomes in potentially curable malignancies, such as early stage breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Randomized clinical trials have clearly shown that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) and the longer-acting pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor pegfilgrastim, when administered 24 hours after chemotherapy before the occurrence of CIN, are effective in reducing the incidence and severity of neutropenia and its complications, including administration of full doses of chemotherapy without treatment delay. Dose-dense chemotherapy, ie, the administration of standard-dose chemotherapy in shorter cycles (made feasible with growth factor support), has recently been shown to improve outcomes in early stage breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This review summarizes the clinical consequences of CIN and describes current best practices for the management of patients at risk for CIN.

[1]  G. Lyman,et al.  Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients receiving dose-intensive cancer chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  D A Berry,et al.  Dose and dose intensity as determinants of outcome in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  F. Holmes,et al.  Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  M. Piccart,et al.  A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  Risk factors for treatment-related death in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a multivariate analysis. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  R A Olshen,et al.  Prognostic significance of actual dose intensity in diffuse large-cell lymphoma: results of a tree-structured survival analysis. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  J. Armitage,et al.  2000 update of recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology Growth Factors Expert Panel. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  D Faraggi,et al.  Survival of diffuse large cell lymphoma. A multivariate analysis including dose intensity variables , 1990, Cancer.

[9]  J. Radford,et al.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to prevent dose-limiting neutropenia in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized controlled trial. , 1992, Blood.

[10]  J. Crawford Clinical uses of pegylated pharmaceuticals in oncology. , 2002, Cancer treatment reviews.

[11]  C Sebban,et al.  Prognostic significance of received relative dose intensity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: application to LNH-87 protocol. The GELA. (Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte). , 1993, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  M. Kris,et al.  Reduction by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor of Fever and Neutropenia Induced by Chemotherapy in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 1991 .

[13]  M. Extermann,et al.  Cancer and aging. An evolving panorama. , 2000, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[14]  G. Lyman,et al.  The economics of febrile neutropenia: implications for the use of colony-stimulating factors. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[15]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  G. Lyman,et al.  PCN12 AN UPDATED RISK THRESHOLD MODEL FOR G-CSF PROPHYLAXIS USE IN CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY: INCORPORATION OF PATIENT OUT-OF-POCKET AND INDIRECT COSTS , 2002 .

[17]  G. Budd,et al.  Delivering adjuvant chemotherapy to women with early‐stage breast carcinoma , 2001, Cancer.

[18]  Gary H Lyman,et al.  Myelotoxicity and dose intensity of chemotherapy: reporting practices from randomized clinical trials. , 2003, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[19]  T. Calandra,et al.  Guidelines for the Use of Antimicrobial Agents in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer , 2002 .

[20]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Targeted filgrastim support in patients with early‐stage breast carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.

[21]  G. Lyman,et al.  Filgrastim in Patients with Neutropenia , 2002, Drugs.

[22]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Y. S. Sathe,et al.  Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia. , 1966, Annals of internal medicine.

[24]  S. Scott,et al.  Days of Prophylactic Filgrastim Use to Reduce Febrile Neutropenia in Patients , 2003, Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP.

[25]  J. von Pawel,et al.  Recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor reduces the infectious complications of cytotoxic chemotherapy. , 1993, European journal of cancer.

[26]  L. R. Hill,et al.  Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  A. Macieira-Coelho,et al.  Cancer and aging , 1986, Experimental Gerontology.

[28]  J. Crawford Once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. , 2003, Seminars in oncology.

[29]  E. D. de Vries,et al.  Dose intensity of standard adjuvant CMF with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. , 1996, Oncology.