3D reconstruction of marble shipwreck cargoes based on underwater multi-image photogrammetry

Abstract Acquisition and processing of point clouds, allowing the high dimensional accuracy that is an essential prerequisite for good documentation, are widely used today for cultural heritage surveys. In recent years, manual and direct surveys in archaeological survey campaigns have been replaced by digital image processing and laser-scanning. Multi-image photogrammetry has proven to be valuable for underwater archaeology. A topographical survey is always necessary to guarantee dimensional accuracy, and is necessary for geo-referencing all the finds in the same reference system. The need for low costs and rapid solutions, combined with the necessity of producing three-dimensional surveys with the same accuracy as classical terrestrial surveying, led the researchers to test and apply image-based techniques. Ca' Foscari and IUAV University of Venice are conducting research into integrated techniques for the accurate documentation of underwater surveys. Survey design, image acquisition, topographical measurements and data processing of two Roman shipwrecks in southern Sicily are presented in this paper. Photogrammetric and topographical surveys were organized using two distinct methods, due to the different characteristics of the cargoes of huge marble blocks, their depth and their distribution on the seabed. The results of the survey are two 3D polygonal-textured models of the sites, which can be easily used for various analyses and trial reconstructions, opening new possibilities for producing documentation for both specialists and the wider public. Furthermore, 3D models are the geometrical basis for making 2D orthophotos and cross-sections. The paper illustrates all the phases of the survey's design, acquisition and preparation, and the data processing to obtain final 2D and 3D representations.

[1]  Jeremy N. Green,et al.  Maritime Archaeology: A Technical Handbook , 1990 .

[2]  Panagiotis Agrafiotis,et al.  CAMERA CONSTANT IN THE CASE OF TWO MEDIA PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2015 .

[3]  S. Del Pizzo,et al.  3D MODELS COMPARISON OF COMPLEX SHELL IN UNDERWATER AND DRY ENVIRONMENTS , 2015 .

[4]  Fabio Bruno,et al.  3D DOCUMENTATION OF ARCHEOLOGICAL REMAINS IN THE UNDERWATER PARK OF BAIAE , 2015 .

[5]  George F. Bass New Techniques of Archaeology and Greek Shipwrecks of the Sixth and Fifth Centuries BC1 , 2006 .

[6]  John D. Leatherdale,et al.  Operational experience in underwater photogrammetry , 1991 .

[7]  Joachim Höhle Reconstruction of the Underwater Object , 1971 .

[8]  Fabio Menna,et al.  Underwater photogrammetry for 3D modelling of floating objects: the case study of a 19-foot motor boat , 2011 .

[9]  Jeremy Green,et al.  Underwater archaeological surveying using PhotoModeler, VirtualMapper: different applications for different problems , 2002 .

[10]  Alessandro Capra Non-Conventional System in Underwater Photogrammetry , 1992 .

[11]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  State of the art in high density image matching , 2014 .

[12]  Franc Solina,et al.  The impact of the latest 3D technologies on the documentation of underwater heritage sites , 2013, 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage).

[13]  M. Canciani,et al.  LOW COST DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE SURVEY AND ARTIFACT ISERTION. THE CASE STUDY OF THE DOLIA WRECK IN SECCHE DELLA MELORIA-LIVORNO-ITALIA. , 2004 .

[14]  Matthew Johnson-Roberson,et al.  Mapping Submerged Archaeological Sites using Stereo‐Vision Photogrammetry , 2013 .

[15]  Nick Rule,et al.  The Direct Survey Method (DSM) of underwater survey, and its application underwater , 1989 .

[16]  Dimitrios Skarlatos,et al.  An ‘Open’ Method for 3D Modelling and Mapping in Underwater Archaeological Sites , 2012 .

[17]  Alessandro Capra,et al.  3D RECONSTRUCTION OF AN UNDERWATER ARCHAELOGICAL SITE: COMPARISON BETWEEN LOW COST CAMERAS , 2015 .

[18]  Dimitrios Skarlatos,et al.  The 4th-century B.C. shipwreck at Mazotos, Cyprus: New techniques and methodologies in the 3D mapping of shipwreck excavations , 2014 .

[19]  Thomas P. Kersten,et al.  Low-Cost and Open-Source Solutions for Automated Image Orientation - A Critical Overview , 2012, EuroMed.

[20]  Djamel Merad,et al.  Underwater programmetry for archaeology and marine biology: 40 years of experience in Marseille, France , 2013, 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage).

[21]  Caterina Balletti,et al.  3D INTEGRATED METHODOLOGIES FOR THE DOCUMENTATION AND THE VIRTUAL RECONSTRUCTION OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE , 2015 .

[22]  Jonathan Benjamin,et al.  Multi-image Photogrammetry for Underwater Archaeological Site Recording: An Accessible, Diver-Based Approach , 2014, Journal of Maritime Archaeology.

[23]  P. Moscati,et al.  CAA2014 : 21st century archaeology : concepts, methods and tools : proceedings of the 42nd annual conference on computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology/ edited by F. Giligny, F. Djindjian, L.Costa, P. Moscati, S. Robert , 2015 .

[24]  G. Bass Archaeology Under Water , 1966 .