Managing barriers of virtual communication in global new product development projects

In virtual operating environments for new product development NPD increase the need to manage communication efficiently. The goal of communication is to reach a shared understanding; however, this is often challenging due to barriers that harm the communication process. Communication barriers typically cause misunderstandings and conflicts and hinder access to relevant information, causing delays in projects and some even fail in reaching their strategic or operational objectives. In addition to identifying the barriers, the main aim of the study was to discover ways of overcoming these barriers. We conducted a multi-method case study in a global telecommunications company. The theoretical base was built on virtual team literature and the theory of communication in virtual NPD teams' context. The key finding of this study is that main barriers to communication are egocentrism, information-sharing behaviour, inadequate language skills, mistrust, communication distortions and miscommunication. In addition, we identify specific managerial implications for organising communications in virtual projects.

[1]  Gert Jan Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations - Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival (3. ed.) , 2010 .

[2]  R. Rice.  Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness , 1992 .

[3]  I. Zigurs.  Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity? , 2003 .

[4]  José R. Goris,et al.  Effects of satisfaction with communication on the relationship between individual‐job congruence and job performance/satisfaction , 2007 .

[5]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Renaissance of case research as a scientific method , 2014 .

[6]  G. Fairholm.  Organizational Power Politics: Tactics in Organizational Leadership , 2009 .

[7]  S. Merriam.  Qualitative Research in Practice , 2008 .

[8]  T. Knowles.  When cultures collide. , 2010, Journal of healthcare protection management : publication of the International Association for Hospital Security.

[9]  Daniel Schall.  Socially-based brokerage and composition in virtual communities , 2013, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[10]  D. Snowden,et al.  A leader's framework for decision making , 2007 .

[11]  Dail Fields,et al.  Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[12]  Brenda Huettner,et al.  Managing Virtual Teams: Getting The Most From Wikis, Blogs, And Other Collaborative Tools , 2006 .

[13]  Keith Popplewell,et al.  Risk in virtual organisation: a case study , 2012, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[14]  Marissa L. Shuffler,et al.  Multinational and Multicultural Distributed Teams , 2007 .

[15]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality , 2005 .

[16]  Line Ramsing,et al.  Project communication in a strategic internal perspective , 2009 .

[17]  L. Turner,et al.  Understanding Interpersonal Communication: Making Choices in Changing Times , 2010 .

[18]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Understanding the Theory and Design of Organizations , 2012 .

[19]  B. Maude,et al.  Managing Cross-Cultural Communication: Principles and Practice , 2011 .

[20]  B. Keysar.  Communication and miscommunication: The role of egocentric processes , 2007 .

[21]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  From a distance and generalizable to up close and grounded: Reclaiming a place for qualitative methods in international business research , 2011 .

[22]  Jian Zuo,et al.  A conceptual meta-framework for managing multicultural global virtual teams , 2013, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[23]  Brian H. Spitzberg,et al.  Human Communication: Motivation, Knowledge, and Skills , 2000 .

[24]  Wei Li,et al.  Virtual knowledge sharing in a cross-cultural context , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[25]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[27]  Terry Cooke-Davies,et al.  The “real” success factors on projects , 2002 .

[28]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[29]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research , 2005 .

[30]  C. Mora.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival , 2013 .

[31]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[32]  N. Kock,et al.  Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward E-communication tools , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[33]  P. Jackson,et al.  Rethinking internal communication: a stakeholder approach , 2007 .

[34]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[35]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  Trust in virtual teams: solved or still a mystery? , 2009, DATB.

[36]  S. Livesey,et al.  Are You Talking to Me? Stakeholder Communication and the Risks and Rewards of Dialogue , 2017 .

[37]  Michael B. Knight.  Enhancing virtual learning team performance: a leadership perspective , 2012 .

[38]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[39]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[40]  H. Haapasalo,et al.  Virtual Competencies and Knowledge Transfer in Global NPD: A Case Study , 2013 .

[41]  Chris J. Sablynski,et al.  Qualitative Research in Organizational and Vocational Psychology, 1979–1999 , 1999 .

[42]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  Evaluation, Knowledge Management, Best Practices, and High Quality Lessons Learned , 2001 .

[43]  Jay Liebowitz,et al.  Knowledge Management and its Integrative Elements , 1997 .

[44]  Keri K. Stephens,et al.  Organizational Communication in Emergencies: Using Multiple Channels and Sources to Combat Noise and Capture Attention , 2013 .

[45]  Petru Lucian Curşeu,et al.  Virtual communicating, conflicts and performance in teams , 2008 .

[46]  Alistair R. Anderson,et al.  Trust formation processes in innovative collaborations: networking as knowledge building practices. , 2013 .

[47]  D. Mukherjee,et al.  Leading virtual teams: how do social, cognitive, and behavioral capabilities matter? , 2012 .

[48]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Managing Behavior in Organizations , 1998 .

[49]  D. Brashers.  Communication and Uncertainty Management. , 2001 .

[50]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction: Developing Effective Organizational Information Systems , 2006 .

[51]  Hans-Gerd Ridder,et al.  The theoretical contribution of case study research to the field of strategy and management , 2009 .

[52]  P. Stockner.  Barriers to communication. , 1982, Veterinary medicine, small animal clinician : VM, SAC.

[53]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Working Together Apart? Building a Knowledge-sharing Culture for Global Virtual Teams , 2004 .

[54]  Linda V. Knight,et al.  Effect of a virtual project team environment on communication-related project risk , 2010 .

[55]  R. Rice,et al.  Electronic Emotion , 1987 .

[56]  M. Huch.  When Cultures Collide , 2003 .

[57]  Jörg Andriof,et al.  Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2: Relationships, Communication, Reporting and Performance , 2003 .

[58]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Conflict and Performance in Global Virtual Teams , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[60]  Liz Lee-Kelley,et al.  Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: A case study , 2008 .

[61]  Judith A. Holton,et al.  Building trust and collaboration in a virtual team , 2001 .