Inter-individual and age-dependent variability in simulated electric fields induced by conventional transcranial electrical stimulation

[1]  M. Vijaya Lakshmi,et al.  Age-related changes in cerebrospinal fluid protein concentrations , 1991, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[2]  David R. Wozny,et al.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Ana Ivelisse Avilés,et al.  Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001, Technometrics.

[4]  P. V. van Rijen,et al.  Measurement of the Conductivity of Skull, Temporarily Removed During Epilepsy Surgery , 2004, Brain Topography.

[5]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[6]  Valer Jurcak,et al.  10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: Their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  K. Muller,et al.  An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[9]  C. Grady.  The cognitive neuroscience of ageing , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: An optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Not all brains are created equal: the relevance of individual differences in responsiveness to transcranial electrical stimulation , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[13]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[14]  Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  How Does it STAC Up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition , 2014, Neuropsychology Review.

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[16]  C. Im,et al.  Inconsistent outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation may originate from anatomical differences among individuals: Electric field simulation using individual MRI data , 2014, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[18]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[19]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[20]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Modeling the effects of noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation at the biophysical, network, and cognitive level. , 2015, Progress in brain research.

[21]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS , 2015, NeuroImage.

[22]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates spontaneous low frequency fluctuations as measured with fMRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[23]  Agnes Flöel,et al.  Can transcranial direct current stimulation counteract age-associated functional impairment? , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[24]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Byron C. Jaeger,et al.  An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the generalized linear mixed model , 2017 .

[26]  L. Parra,et al.  Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[27]  A. Datta,et al.  Effect of aging on current flow due to transcranial direct current stimulation , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[28]  A. Peterchev.  Transcranial electric stimulation seen from within the brain , 2017, eLife.

[29]  Markus Bühner,et al.  Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler , 2017 .

[30]  Matthew R. Krause,et al.  Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation , 2018, Nature Communications.

[31]  Farzad Towhidkhah,et al.  Computational human head models of tDCS: Influence of brain atrophy on current density distribution , 2018, Brain Stimulation.

[32]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art , 2018, NeuroImage.

[33]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Effect of Aging on Cortical Current Flow Due to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Considerations for Safety , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[34]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Age-dependent effects of brain stimulation on network centrality , 2018, NeuroImage.

[35]  Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al.  SimNIBS 2.1: A Comprehensive Pipeline for Individualized Electric Field Modelling for Transcranial Brain Stimulation , 2019 .

[36]  Adam J. Woods,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Aging Research , 2019, Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

[37]  Giampaolo Pisano,et al.  Variation in Reported Human Head Tissue Electrical Conductivity Values , 2019, Brain Topography.

[38]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Methodology for tDCS integration with fMRI , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[39]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[40]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Cost of focality in TDCS: Interindividual variability in electric fields , 2020, Brain Stimulation.

[41]  Giampaolo Pisano,et al.  Variation in Reported Human Head Tissue Electrical Conductivity Values , 2019, Brain Topography.

[42]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over S1 Differentially Modulates Proprioceptive Accuracy in Young and Old Adults , 2019, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[43]  Semiha Aydin,et al.  Towards precise brain stimulation: Is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation? , 2019, Brain Stimulation.

[44]  Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al.  Value and limitations of intracranial recordings for validating electric field modeling for transcranial brain stimulation , 2019, NeuroImage.

[45]  Adam J. Woods,et al.  Modeling transcranial electrical stimulation in the aging brain , 2020, Brain Stimulation.