Smoke Detection with Ensemble Modeling

This research aims at investigating performance of the ensemble learning method. The ensemble learning brings together various weak learners to create strong learners. Based on this ensemble learning idea, we develop a model for an efficient smoke detection tool. The three schemes of ensemble learning are investigated including bagging, boosting, and stacking. The bagging ensemble algorithm studied in this research is Random Forest and the boosting algorithm is AdaBoost. The stacking ensemble adopts three algorithms, that are Random Forest, AdaBoost, and Logistic Regression. The other learning algorithms adopted for performance comparison include Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, and Decision Tree. The smoke detection data contain 62,630 records and 15 features. The dataset has been separated into training set and test set with a ratio of 75:25. The experimental results reveal that AdaBoost outperforms other learning algorithms when applied to the specific smoke detection application domain.

[1]  M. Chuttur,et al.  A Comparison of AdaBoost and SVC for Fake Hotel Reviews Detection , 2022, 2022 3rd International Conference on Computation, Automation and Knowledge Management (ICCAKM).

[2]  Weiwei Cai,et al.  A high-precision forest fire smoke detection approach based on ARGNet , 2022, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[3]  Ahmad AL Smadi,et al.  Deep convolutional neural network-based system for fish classification , 2022, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE).

[4]  Vibha Jain,et al.  Stacking Ensemble-Based Intelligent Machine Learning Model for Predicting Post-COVID-19 Complications , 2021, New Generation Computing.

[5]  S. Fan,et al.  Predictive model for the 5-year survival status of osteosarcoma patients based on the SEER database and XGBoost algorithm , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Daniel W. Apley,et al.  Preimages for variation patterns from kernel PCA and bagging , 2014 .

[7]  Max Kuhn,et al.  Applied Predictive Modeling , 2013 .

[8]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation , 2011, ArXiv.

[9]  Patil SangitaB,et al.  Use of Support Vector Machine, decision tree and Naive Bayesian techniques for wind speed classification , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Power and Energy Systems.

[10]  L. Breiman.  Random Forests , 2001, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[11]  L. Breiman.  Arcing classifier (with discussion and a rejoinder by the author) , 1998 .

[12]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1997, EuroCOLT.

[13]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[14]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[15]  Dirk Van,et al.  Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms , 2012 .