Following the transfer of DNA: How does the presence of background DNA affect the transfer and detection of a target source of DNA?

DNA transfer is of increasing importance in crime scene situations, partly due to analytical techniques detecting profiles in ever declining amounts of DNA. Whereas the focus has previously been DNA transfer of target sources, the effects of background DNA on transfer and detection of DNA after multiple contact situations have been much less investigated. This study measured the transfer and detection rates of a specific DNA source in the presence of background DNA sources. The presence of background DNA influenced the transfer of DNA differently depending on the combination of biological material and surface type. The detection of a profile from the target DNA decreased after multiple contact situations, due to the reduced total and relative quantity of target DNA, and the increasing complexity of the mixture. The results of this study contribute to a greater understanding of the effects of background DNA sources on DNA transfer and detection.

[1]  Roland A H van Oorschot,et al.  Investigation of secondary DNA transfer of skin cells under controlled test conditions. , 2010, Legal medicine.

[2]  H. C. Lee,et al.  A systematic analysis of secondary DNA transfer. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  R. V. Oorschot,et al.  DNA fingerprints from fingerprints , 1997, Nature.

[4]  Roland A H van Oorschot,et al.  Evaluation of multiple transfer of DNA using mock case scenarios. , 2012, Legal medicine.

[5]  Ragne Kristin Farmen,et al.  Assessment of individual shedder status and implication for secondary DNA transfer , 2008 .

[6]  S. Petricevic,et al.  The tendency of individuals to transfer DNA to handled items. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[7]  Roland A H van Oorschot,et al.  The influence of substrate on DNA transfer and extraction efficiency. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[8]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[9]  David H. Warshauer,et al.  An evaluation of the transfer of saliva-derived DNA , 2012, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[10]  Kaye N. Ballantyne,et al.  Following the transfer of DNA: How far can it go? , 2013 .

[11]  R. Allen,et al.  Identification through typing of DNA recovered from touch transfer evidence: Parameters affecting yield of recovered human DNA , 2008 .

[12]  Roland A H van Oorschot,et al.  DNA transfer within forensic exhibit packaging: potential for DNA loss and relocation. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[13]  Dyan J Daly,et al.  The transfer of touch DNA from hands to glass, fabric and wood. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[14]  Gillian Tully,et al.  The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[15]  Roland A H van Oorschot,et al.  Secondary DNA transfer of biological substances under varying test conditions. , 2010, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[16]  Robert John Mitchell,et al.  Impact of relevant variables on the transfer of biological substances , 2009 .

[17]  M. Klintschar,et al.  Transfer of biological stains from different surfaces , 2011, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[18]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  Data analysis 2 , 2016 .

[19]  Titia Sijen,et al.  Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results. , 2011, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[20]  R. J. Mitchell,et al.  Evaluating the efficiency of DNA extraction methods from different substrates , 2011 .