An automated negotiator for an international crisis

Canada enforces conservation measures with military force against Spain. This can result in either success, partial success or failure. (4) Spain enforces its right to fish throughout the fishery with military force against Canada. This can result in either success, partial success or failure. (5) Status quo. The following are world state parameters that are also negotiable and affect the players’ utilities: (a) Canada subsidizes the removal of Spain's ships (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 ships). (b) Spain reduces the amount of pollution caused by the fishing fleet (0%, 15%, 25%, 50%). (c) Canada imposes trade sanctions on Spain. (d) Spain imposes trade sanctions on Canada. The negotiation takes time and is divided into time periods. If the negotiation does not end by the beginning of the fishing season, then the status quo will be implemented. During the negotiation, each of the parties has the capability to make requests, threats, offers, conditional offers and counteroffers, as well as to comment on the negotiation. See (Hoz-Weiss 2001, Hoz-Weiss et. al) for the values and examples of the utility functions of the players in the fishing dispute.