Team Size, Research Variety, and Research Performance: Do Coauthors' Coauthors Matter?

[1]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? , 2009, ArXiv.

[2]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Decoding team and individual impact in science and invention , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Feng Xia,et al.  Science of Scientific Team Science: A survey , 2019, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[4]  Arndt Werner,et al.  Team Size and Effort in Start-Up Teams - Another Consequence of Free-Riding and Peer Pressure in Partnerships , 2006 .

[5]  S. Boccaletti,et al.  Multilayer representation of collaboration networks with higher-order interactions , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Mark P. Carpenter,et al.  International Research Collaboration , 1979 .

[7]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[8]  Hyungseok Yoon,et al.  How does openness influence the impact of a scholar’s research? An analysis of business scholars’ citations over their careers , 2018, Research Policy.

[9]  O. Persson,et al.  Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration , 1992 .

[10]  G. Weber,et al.  Faculty Promotion and Attrition: The Importance of Coauthor Network Reach at an Academic Medical Center , 2015, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[11]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Recombinant Search and Breakthrough Idea Generation: An Analysis of High Impact Papers in the Social Sciences , 2011 .

[12]  W. Shrum,et al.  Professional networks, scientific collaboration, and publication productivity in resource-constrained research institutions in a developing country , 2011 .

[13]  Tõnis Mets,et al.  THE CHANGING APPROACH IN ACADEMIA-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION: FROM PROFIT ORIENTATION TO INNOVATION SUPPORT , 2013 .

[14]  Eldon Y. Li,et al.  Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective , 2013 .

[15]  James A. Evans,et al.  Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology , 2019, Nature.

[16]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Do alliances promote knowledge flows , 2006 .

[17]  Erin Leahey,et al.  Prominent but Less Productive , 2015, ArXiv.

[18]  Benjamin F. Jones.  The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[19]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[20]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Social Networks within Sales Organizations: Their Development and Importance for Salesperson Performance , 2015 .

[21]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Three decades of tourism scholarship: Gender, collaboration and research methods , 2020, Tourism Management.

[22]  Yulin Fang,et al.  Understanding employee innovative behavior: Integrating the social network and leader-member exchange perspectives , 2011 .

[23]  C. Stevens,et al.  Getting to Know You: Motivating Cross-Understanding for Improved Team and Individual Performance , 2020, Organization Science.

[24]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Creativity in scientific teams: : Unpacking novelty and impact , 2015 .

[25]  Noriko Hara,et al.  An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[27]  Jian Wang,et al.  Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation , 2013, Scientometrics.

[28]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[29]  G. Heimeriks,et al.  Disciplinary, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary: Concepts and Indicators. , 2001 .

[30]  K. Brad Wray,et al.  The Epistemic Significance of Collaborative Research , 2002, Philosophy of Science.

[31]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  An Experimental Study of Team Size and Performance on a Complex Task , 2016, PloS one.

[32]  M. Lamont,et al.  Shared Cognitive–Emotional–Interactional Platforms , 2016 .

[33]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[34]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999 , 2004 .

[35]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  The social network among engineering design teams and their creativity: A case study among teams in two product development programs , 2010 .

[36]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact , 2013, Science.

[37]  Greta Hsu.  Jacks of All Trades and Masters of None: Audiences' Reactions to Spanning Genres in Feature Film Production , 2006 .

[38]  G. Labianca,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Group Social Capital , 2006 .

[39]  Kon Shing Kenneth Chung,et al.  Egocentric analysis of co-authorship network structure, position and performance , 2012, Inf. Process. Manag..

[40]  C. Oppenheim,et al.  The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update , 2008 .

[41]  Shen Xu,et al.  The relationships between distance factors and international collaborative research outcomes: A bibliometric examination , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[42]  Julie M. Hite,et al.  Knowledge network centrality, formal rank and research performance: evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects , 2015, Scientometrics.

[43]  Giacomo Negro,et al.  Filling Empty Seats: How Status and Organizational Hierarchies Affect Exploration Versus Exploitation in Team Design , 2006 .

[44]  María Bordons,et al.  Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: The effects of the multidisciplinary research programme , 1999, Scientometrics.

[45]  Kaihua Chen,et al.  Do research institutes benefit from their network positions in research collaboration networks with industries or/and universities? , 2017 .

[46]  Stasa Milojevic,et al.  Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[48]  D. Simonton.  After Einstein: Scientific genius is extinct , 2013, Nature.

[49]  Richard van Noorden.  Interdisciplinary research by the numbers , 2015, Nature.

[50]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Collaborating for Knowledge Creation and Application: The Case of Nanotechnology Research Programs , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[51]  Rens Vliegenthart,et al.  Research productivity in the era of the internet revisited , 2009 .

[52]  Charles C. Persinger,et al.  How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[53]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades , 2006 .

[54]  David A. Bright,et al.  Multilevel determinants of collaboration between organised criminal groups , 2020, Soc. Networks.

[55]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[56]  M. A. Campion,et al.  The Knowledge, Skill, and Ability Requirements for Teamwork: Implications for Human Resource Management , 1994 .

[57]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production , 2016, Social studies of science.

[58]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[59]  V. Larivière,et al.  How Many Is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact , 2016, PloS one.

[60]  Matjaž Perc,et al.  The coauthorship networks of the most productive European researchers , 2020, Scientometrics.