Inter-segment foot motion and ground reaction forces over the stance phase of walking.

OBJECTIVE To compare the magnitude and patterns of motion of the rearfoot segment relative to the leg, forefoot segment relative to the rearfoot, height change in the medial longitudinal arch and ground reaction forces of normal adult males during the stance phase of walking. BACKGROUND Knowledge of normal motion of the rearfoot and forefoot segments and of the arch during stance phase is important in clinical management. METHODS Motion data were obtained from surface markers, and force data from a force plate, from the right limb of participants while walking at a self-selected pace. RESULTS Stance phase range of motion across sagittal, frontal and transverse planes was 12 degrees, 4 degrees and 10 degrees for the forefoot, compared to 22 degrees, 8 degrees and 10 degrees for the rearfoot. Most motion occurred at the beginning and end of stance phase when support was via only the rearfoot or forefoot, and when forces were maximal. Arch height decreased from heel contact and increased after heel rise to its maximum at toe-off. CONCLUSIONS The extent of forefoot segment motion confirms the significance of midfoot joints to normal foot function. Between foot flat and heel rise, the forefoot pattern of motion is indicative of foot stability. Typical foot motion does not obey descriptions of triplanar motion such as 'pronation' and 'supination'. RELEVANCE Typical stance phase foot motion has been described according to a forefoot:rearfoot model and rearfoot:leg model of motion, together with profiles of medial longitudinal arch height and ground reaction forces. This information can be applied in the management of foot dysfunction and should stimulate research into midfoot motion and overall control of the foot.

[1]  Arne Lundberg,et al.  The pattern of motion of the longitudinal arch of the foot , 1994 .

[2]  K. An,et al.  Kinematics of the Normal Arch of the Foot and Ankle Under Physiologic Loading , 1995, Foot & ankle international.

[3]  R. Smith,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the forefoot, rearfoot, and leg without the function of tibialis posterior in comparison with normals during stance phase of walking. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  L P Brown,et al.  Locomotor biomechanics and pathomechanics: a review. , 1987, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[5]  R. Smith,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the rearfoot during the stance phase of walking in normal young adult males. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  T G McPoil,et al.  Three-dimensional movement of the foot during the stance phase of walking. , 1999, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[7]  S. Sarrafian.  Functional Characteristics of the Foot and Plantar Aponeurosis under Tibiotalar Loading , 1987, Foot & ankle.

[8]  M P Kadaba,et al.  Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  R. N. Stauffer,et al.  Normative data of knee joint motion and ground reaction forces in adult level walking. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Adrienne Hunt,et al.  Three dimensional kinematics of the rearfoot during stance phase of walking in normal young adult males , 1994 .

[11]  O. Svensson,et al.  Kinematics of the Ankle/Foot Complex—Part 3: Influence of Leg Rotation , 1989, Foot & ankle.

[12]  D. Winter,et al.  Talocrural and talocalcaneal joint kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  J. Woodburn,et al.  A preliminary study determining the feasibility of electromagnetic tracking for kinematics at the ankle joint complex. , 1999, Rheumatology.

[14]  A. Lundberg,et al.  Kinematics of the Ankle/Foot Complex: Plantarflexion and Dorsiflexion , 1989, Foot & ankle.

[15]  Adrienne E Hunt,et al.  Static measures of calcaneal deviation and arch angle as predictors of rearfoot motion during walking. , 2000, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[16]  A Leardini,et al.  An anatomically based protocol for the description of foot segment kinematics during gait. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  H. K. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  K. An,et al.  Repeated measures of adult normal walking using a video tracking system 1 Presented in part at the 1 , 1997 .

[19]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[20]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[21]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  B. Maslen,et al.  Radiographic study of skin displacement errors in the foot and ankle during standing. , 1994, Clinical biomechanics.

[23]  T. McPoil,et al.  Biomechanics of the foot in walking: a function approach. , 1985, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[24]  Richard Smith,et al.  Medial Longitudinal Arch of the Foot: Stationary Versus Walking Measures , 1999, Foot & ankle international.

[25]  B M Nigg,et al.  Three-dimensional measurement of rearfoot motion during running. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Shahan K. Sarrafian,et al.  Anatomy of the Foot and Ankle: Descriptive, Topographic, Functional , 1983 .

[27]  O. Svensson,et al.  Kinematics of the Ankle/Foot Complex—Part 2: Pronation and Supination , 1989, Foot & ankle.

[28]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.