A Method for Selecting Affordable System Concepts: A Case Application to Naval Ship Design

Abstract The current defense acquisition environment includes much uncertainty regarding future budgets, political developments, and global geopolitical events. With affordability of systems now mandated by the US Department of Defense, it is imperative to ensure that future acquisitions will be feasible from their inception given resource considerations, and can remain feasible given various future perturbations of those resources. This paper introduces a method for early conceptual development (inception) of major defense systems and demonstrates the method's application to a case study of a hypothetical naval ship acquisition. The results of the application and the implications of the method for system development are discussed.

[1]  Tim Dowd.  Obtaining Greater Efficiency and Productivity in Defense Spending , 2011 .

[2]  Gene L Dodaro,et al.  GAO's 2011 High-Risk Series: An Update , 2011 .

[3]  Matthew B. Lieutenant junior grade Smith.  Updating MIT's cost estimation model for shipbuilding , 2008 .

[4]  Douglas M. Schofield.  A framework and methodology for enhancing operational requirements development : United States Coast Guard cutter project case study , 2010 .

[5]  D. Rhodes,et al.  Enabling Design for Affordability: An Epoch-Era Analysis Approach , 2013 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[7]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  11.1.1 Using Natural Value-Centric Time Scales for Conceptualizing System Timelines through Epoch-Era Analysis , 2008 .

[8]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Using Pareto Trace to determine system passive value robustness , 2009, 2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[9]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Responsive systems comparison method: Dynamic insights into designing a satellite radar system , 2009 .

[10]  Michael J Sullivan,et al.  Defense Acquisitions: Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs , 2015 .

[11]  Matthew E. Fitzgerald,et al.  8.4.1 Assessing Uncertain Benefits: a Valuation Approach for Strategic Changeability (VASC) , 2012 .

[12]  A. D. Hall,et al.  Metasystems methodology : a new synthesis and unification , 1989 .

[13]  M. E. Fitzgerald,et al.  Mitigating contextual uncertainties with valuable changeability analysis in the multi-epoch domain , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Systems Conference SysCon 2012.

[14]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Responsive Systems Comparison Method: Case Study in Assessing Future Designs in the Presence of Change , 2008 .

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[16]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Evaluating system change options and timing using the epoch syncopation framework , 2012, CSER.