Cochleostomy Versus Round Window Insertions: Influence on Functional Outcomes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System

Objective To assess the potential influence of 2 different surgical access routes to scala tympani for hearing preservation cochlear implantation on outcomes. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Tertiary care academic center. Patients Twenty adult subjects participating in a prospective clinical trial on electric-acoustic stimulation. Subjects underwent cochlear implantation with attempted hearing preservation and subsequent ipsilateral electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. Interventions Eight subjects (40%) were implanted using a round window–related cochleostomy and 12 subjects (60%) via a round window approach. Main Outcome Measures Postoperative acoustic hearing preservation and speech perception measures were obtained at defined intervals and compared for both groups with and without the use of the external speech processor. Results The data demonstrate no statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes for both preservation of residual hearing and unaided and aided speech perception between the cochleostomy and round window groups. Conclusion The results of this investigation suggest that hearing preservation cochlear implantation can be performed either via a round window–related cochleostomy as well as via the round window membrane itself with similar outcomes in terms of both hearing preservation rates as well as speech perception measures.

[1]  E Lehnhardt,et al.  [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique]. , 1993, HNO.

[2]  G M Clark,et al.  A multiple electrode cochlear implant , 1977, Journal of Laryngology and Otology.

[3]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  C von Ilberg,et al.  Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. , 1999, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[5]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Development and Evaluation of an Improved Cochlear Implant Electrode Design for Electric Acoustic Stimulation , 2004, The Laryngoscope.

[6]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Role of Electrode Placement as a Contributor to Variability in Cochlear Implant Outcomes , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  Ilona Anderson,et al.  Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI100 implant system using the FLEXEAS electrode array , 2011, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[8]  Andreas Radeloff,et al.  Scala Tympani Cochleostomy II: Topography and Histology , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[9]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: A histologically controlled insertion study , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[10]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  [New method of partial deafness treatment]. , 2003, Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology.

[11]  S. Berrettini,et al.  Benefit from bimodal hearing in a group of prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users. , 2010, American journal of otolaryngology.

[12]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  In Vivo Estimates of the Position of Advanced Bionics Electrode Arrays in the Human Cochlea , 2007, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[13]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: Results of a Clinical Study , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.

[14]  C. G. Wright,et al.  Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: The Round Window Revisited , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[15]  Toshio Ishibashi,et al.  Factors Associated with Poor Outcome in Children with Acute Otitis Media , 2003, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[16]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[17]  G M Clark,et al.  Surgical anatomy of the round window with special reference to cochlear implantation , 1987, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[18]  Wilko Grolman,et al.  Hearing Preservation Surgery: Cochleostomy or Round Window Approach? A Systematic Review , 2013, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[19]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[20]  Thomas Klenzner,et al.  Quality Control After Insertion of the Nucleus Contour and Contour Advance Electrode in Adults , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[21]  C. Buchman,et al.  Detection of Intracochlear Damage With Cochlear Implantation in a Gerbil Model of Hearing Loss , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[22]  U. Baumann,et al.  Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation. , 2010, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[23]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Surgery for an Improved Multiple-Channel Cochlear Implant , 1984, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[24]  A Radeloff,et al.  Evaluating cochlear implant trauma to the scala vestibuli , 2005, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[25]  H Plenk,et al.  Perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implant surgery. , 2001, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[26]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear , 2004, International journal of audiology.