Preferences and agreement in legislative parties: testing the causal chain

ABSTRACT This research note focuses on two specific dimensions of legislative cohesion: the homogeneity of preferences within a party and party agreement. Although these two dimensions have often been considered as synonyms, it is argued that these two concepts refer to different realities. The authors therefore develop distinct measurements for these two concepts. The authors then examine their statistical relationship, putting to the test the widespread assumption that heterogeneous preferences increase the probability of disagreement. The authors do so by testing the effect of different measures of a member of parliament’s ideological distance to her/his party on her/his self-reported frequency of disagreement with her/his party. It is demonstrated that the causal chain linking both concepts is only verified in the case of a conscious ideological distance. The results have crucial theoretical and methodological implications for future research on party cohesion and party unity.

[1]  Ulrich Sieberer.  Party unity in parliamentary democracies: A comparative analysis , 2006, The Impact of Legislatures.

[2]  Christian Stecker.  How effects on party unity vary across votes , 2015 .

[3]  Xavier Coller,et al.  Cohesion and Candidate Selection in Parliamentary Groups , 2015 .

[4]  E. Coman.  Institutions and Vote Unity in Parliaments: Evidence from 33 National Chambers , 2015 .

[5]  Andrea Ceron,et al.  Brave rebels stay home , 2015 .

[6]  Sergiu Gherghina,et al.  Determinants of legislative voting loyalty under different electoral systems: Evidence from Romania , 2014 .

[7]  M. Russell.  Parliamentary party cohesion , 2014 .

[8]  Reuven Y. Hazan,et al.  Agreement, Loyalty, and Discipline , 2014 .

[9]  Kris Deschouwer,et al.  Representing the People in Parliaments , 2014 .

[10]  Kris Deschouwer,et al.  Representing the people : a survey among members of statewide and sub-state parliaments , 2014 .

[11]  Françoise Bouçek.  Factional Politics: How Dominant Parties Implode or Stabilize , 2012 .

[12]  R. Andeweg,et al.  Pathways to party unity: Sanctions, loyalty, homogeneity and division of labour in the Dutch parliament , 2011 .

[13]  H. Pedersen.  How intra-party power relations affect the coalition behaviour of political parties , 2010 .

[14]  Christopher Kam.  Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics: The cost of dissent to the party , 2009 .

[15]  K. Benoit,et al.  Intra-party politics and coalition governments , 2009 .

[16]  Thomas Saalfeld.  Intra-party Conflict and Cabinet Survival in 17 West European Democracies, 1945-1999 , 2008 .

[17]  J. Carey.  Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting , 2007 .

[18]  Reuven Y. Hazan,et al.  The influence of candidate selection methods on legislatures and legislators: Theoretical propositions, methodological suggestions and empirical evidence , 2006 .

[19]  Sam Depauw,et al.  Legislative party discipline and cohesion in comparative perspective , 2005 .

[20]  S. Hix.  Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament , 2004 .

[21]  Reuven Y. Hazan Senior.  Introduction: Does cohesion equal discipline? towards a conceptual delineation , 2003 .

[22]  B. Sinclair.  Legislative cohesion and presidential policy success , 2003 .

[23]  P. Norton.  Part 1: Cohesion , 2003 .

[24]  D. Olson.  Cohesion and Discipline Revisited: Contingent Unity in the Parliamentary Party Group , 2003 .

[25]  W. Patzelt.  Party Cohesion and Party Discipline in German Parliaments , 2003 .

[26]  Jonathan Malloy,et al.  High discipline, low cohesion? the uncertain patterns of canadian parliamentary party groups , 2003 .

[27]  P. Norton.  Cohesion without Discipline: Party Voting in the House of Lords , 2003 .

[28]  Reuven Y. Hazan.  Does Cohesion Equal Discipline?: Towards a Conceptual Delineation , 2003 .

[29]  Christopher Kam,et al.  Do Ideological Preferences Explain Parliamentary Behaviour? Evidence from Great Britain and Canada , 2001 .

[30]  Asbjørn Skjæveland.  Party Cohesion in the Danish Parliament , 2001 .

[31]  H. van Schuur,et al.  Where's the party? , 1997 .

[32]  Ergun Özbudun.  Party cohesion in western democracies: A causal analysis , 1970 .