Familiar shapes attract attention in figure-ground displays

We report five experiments that explore the effect of figure-ground factors on attention. We hypothesized that figural cues, such as familiar shape, would draw attention to the figural side in an attentional cuing task using bipartite figure-ground displays. The first two experiments used faces in profile as the familiar shape and found a perceptual advantage for targets presented on the meaningful side of the central contour in detection speed (Experiment 1) and discrimination accuracy (Experiment 2). The third experiment demonstrated the figural advantage in response time (RT) with nine other familiar shapes (including a sea horse, a guitar, a fir tree, etc.), but only when targets appeared in close proximity to the contour. A fourth experiment obtained a figural advantage in a discrimination task with the larger set of familiar shapes. The final experiment ruled out eye movements as a possible confounding factor by replicating the RT advantage for targets on the figural side of face displays when all trials containing eye movements were eliminated. The results are discussed in terms of ecological influences on attention, and are cast within the framework of Yantis and Jonides’s (1984) hypothesis that attention is exogenously drawn to the onset of new perceptual objects. We argue that the figural side constitutes an “object,” whereas the ground side does not, and that figural cues such as shape familiarity are effective in determining which areas represent objects.

[1]  J. Jonides Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[2]  S. Palmer,et al.  Surface convexity and extremal edges in depth and figure-ground perception , 2005 .

[3]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[4]  M. Peterson,et al.  Object-centered attentional biases and object recognition contributions to scene segmentation in left- and right-hemisphere-damaged patients , 1998, Psychobiology.

[5]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  T. Marill Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .

[7]  R. Klein,et al.  Familiarity and attention: Does what we know affect what we notice? , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Stanley Coren,et al.  Sensation and perception , 1979 .

[9]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  B. Gibson,et al.  Must Figure-Ground Organization Precede Object Recognition? An Assumption in Peril , 1994 .

[12]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Figure-ground organization and object recognition processes: an interactive account. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  S. Palmer,et al.  Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[16]  Hong Zhou,et al.  Representation of stereoscopic edges in monkey visual cortex , 2000, Vision Research.

[17]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi,et al.  Object memory effects on figure assignment: conscious object recognition is not necessary or sufficient , 2000, Vision Research.

[20]  Jon Driver,et al.  One-Sided Edge Assignment in Vision: 1. Figure-Ground Segmentation and Attention to Objects , 1995 .

[21]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  What's in a stage name ? Comment on Vecera and O'Reilly (1998) , 1999 .

[22]  C. Osgood Method and theory in experimental psychology , 1953 .

[23]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Edge-Texture Grouping: A New Class of Information about Depth and Shape , 2004 .

[24]  N Weisstein,et al.  A new perceptual context-superiority effect: line segments are more visible against a figure than against a ground. , 1982, Science.

[25]  S. Palmer Vision Science : Photons to Phenomenology , 1999 .

[26]  Anastasia V. Flevaris,et al.  Exogenous Spatial Attention Influences Figure-Ground Assignment , 2004 .

[27]  Stephen Wallace,et al.  Figure and Ground , 1982 .

[28]  B. Gibson,et al.  Shape Recognition Inputs To Figure-Ground Organization in Three-Dimensional Displays , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Leyre Castro,et al.  Figure-ground assignment in pigeons: Evidence for a figural benefit , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  S. Coren,et al.  In Sensation and perception , 1979 .

[31]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. , 1984 .

[32]  J. M. Hupé,et al.  Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons , 1998, Nature.

[33]  K. J. Craik,et al.  OBSERVATIONS RELATING TO THE THRESHOLD OF A SMALL FIGURE WITHIN THE CONTOUR OF A CLOSED‐LINE FIGURE , 1939 .

[34]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind , 1978 .

[35]  M. Peterson,et al.  Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground reversal: which route counts? , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  The Phenomenology of Attention , 1997, Consciousness and Cognition.

[37]  K. Koffka Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[38]  A. Gelb,et al.  Die Bedeutung von “Figur” und “Grund” für die Farbenschwelle , 1926 .

[39]  D. Levin CLASSIFYING FACES BY RACE : THE STRUCTURE OF FACE CATEGORIES , 1996 .

[40]  Victor A. F. Lamme The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Jonides Further toward a model of the Mind’s eye’s movement , 1983 .