Nonrigid 3D Medical Image Registration and Fusion Based on Deformable Models

For coregistration of medical images, rigid methods often fail to provide enough freedom, while reliable elastic methods are available clinically for special applications only. The number of degrees of freedom of elastic models must be reduced for use in the clinical setting to archive a reliable result. We propose a novel geometry-based method of nonrigid 3D medical image registration and fusion. The proposed method uses a 3D surface-based deformable model as guidance. In our twofold approach, the deformable mesh from one of the images is first applied to the boundary of the object to be registered. Thereafter, the non-rigid volume deformation vector field needed for registration and fusion inside of the region of interest (ROI) described by the active surface is inferred from the displacement of the surface mesh points. The method was validated using clinical images of a quasirigid organ (kidney) and of an elastic organ (liver). The reduction in standard deviation of the image intensity difference between reference image and model was used as a measure of performance. Landmarks placed at vessel bifurcations in the liver were used as a gold standard for evaluating registration results for the elastic liver. Our registration method was compared with affine registration using mutual information applied to the quasi-rigid kidney. The new method achieved 15.11% better quality with a high confidence level of 99% for rigid registration. However, when applied to the quasi-elastic liver, the method has an averaged landmark dislocation of 4.32 mm. In contrast, affine registration of extracted livers yields a significantly (P = 0.000001) smaller dislocation of 3.26 mm. In conclusion, our validation shows that the novel approach is applicable in cases where internal deformation is not crucial, but it has limitations in cases where internal displacement must also be taken into account.

[1]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  R. Courant,et al.  On the Partial Difference Equations, of Mathematical Physics , 2015 .

[3]  James A. Sethian,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid , 2012 .

[4]  Alex M. Andrew,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Science (2nd edition) , 2000 .

[5]  Frank Fischbach,et al.  MR-guided liver tumor ablation employing open high-field 1.0T MRI for image-guided brachytherapy , 2010, European Radiology.

[6]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Valmet: A New Validation Tool for Assessing and Improving 3D Object Segmentation , 2001, MICCAI.

[7]  Thomas W. Sederberg,et al.  Free-form deformation of solid geometric models , 1986, SIGGRAPH.

[8]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[9]  Tomaso A. Poggio,et al.  On Edge Detection , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[11]  M. Meissler,et al.  Absolute Quantification of Regional Renal Blood Flow in Swine by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a Blood Pool Contrast Agent , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[12]  Y. J. Zhang,et al.  A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous validation of image segmentation and assessment of expert quality [tumor MRI application] , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[14]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms , 2021, Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms.

[16]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[17]  Tom Vercauteren,et al.  An ITK Implementation of the Symmetric Log-Domain Diffeomorphic Demons Algorithm , 2009, The Insight Journal.

[18]  D. Beyersdorff,et al.  Implementation of a rapid inversion-prepared dual-contrast gradient echo sequence for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the human prostate. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[20]  J. Ahlberg Active Contours in Three Dimensions , 1996 .

[21]  P. Wust,et al.  In Vivo Assessment of Dose Volume and Dose Gradient Effects on the Tolerance Dose of Small Liver Volumes after Single-Fraction High-Dose-Rate 192Ir Irradiation , 2009, Radiation research.

[22]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Oscar Camara,et al.  Generalized Overlap Measures for Evaluation and Validation in Medical Image Analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  A Registration-Based Propagation Framework for Automatic Whole Heart Segmentation of Cardiac MRI , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces , 2002, Applied mathematical sciences.

[27]  D. Beyersdorff,et al.  MRI before and after external beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy of patients with prostate cancer: the feasibility of monitoring of radiation-induced tissue changes using a dynamic contrast-enhanced inversion-prepared dual-contrast gradient echo sequence. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  Martin D. Levine,et al.  Dynamic Measurement of Computer Generated Image Segmentations , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[29]  William M. Wells,et al.  Validation of Image Segmentation and Expert Quality with an Expectation-Maximization Algorithm , 2002, MICCAI.

[30]  Gary E. Christensen,et al.  Improving Intensity-Based Lung CT Registration Accuracy Utilizing Vascular Information , 2012, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[31]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[32]  Fabrice Heitz,et al.  Retrospective evaluation of a topology preserving non-rigid registration method , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[33]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  Ralph W. Gerard,et al.  Methods in medical research , 1967 .

[35]  Fabrice Heitz,et al.  3-D deformable image registration: a topology preservation scheme based on hierarchical deformation models and interval analysis optimization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[36]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  A methodology for evaluation of boundary detection algorithms on medical images , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[37]  W. Friedman,et al.  Repeat Radiosurgery for Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations , 2012, Neurosurgery.