Mobile telephone use is associated with changes in cognitive function in young adolescents

As part of the Mobile Radiofrequency Phone Exposed Users' Study (MoRPhEUS), a cross-sectional epidemiological study examined cognitive function in secondary school students. We recruited 317, 7th grade students (144 boys, 173 girls, median age 13 years) from 20 schools around Melbourne, Australia. Participants completed an exposure questionnaire based on the Interphone study, a computerised cognitive test battery, and the Stroop colour-word test. The principal exposure metric was the total number of reported mobile phone voice calls per week. Linear regression models were fitted to cognitive test response times and accuracies. Age, gender, ethnicity, socio-economic status and handedness were fitted as covariates and standard errors were adjusted for clustering by school. The accuracy of working memory was poorer, reaction time for a simple learning task shorter, associative learning response time shorter and accuracy poorer in children reporting more mobile phone voice calls. There were no significant relationships between exposure and signal detection, movement monitoring or estimation. The completion time for Stroop word naming tasks was longer for those reporting more mobile phone voice calls. The findings were similar for total short message service (SMS, also known as text) messages per week, suggesting these cognitive changes were unlikely due to radiofrequency (RF) exposure. Overall, mobile phone use was associated with faster and less accurate responding to higher level cognitive tasks. These behaviours may have been learned through frequent use of a mobile phone.

[1]  R A Cox Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields , 1990, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[2]  Rodney J. Croft,et al.  The relative contributions of ecstasy and cannabis to cognitive impairment , 2001, Psychopharmacology.

[3]  Maria Blettner,et al.  Validation of self-reported cellular phone use , 2004, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[4]  Leeka Kheifets,et al.  Prenatal and Postnatal Exposure to Cell Phone Use and Behavioral Problems in Children , 2008, Epidemiology.

[5]  Naohito Yamaguchi,et al.  The INTERPHONE study: design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population , 2007, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[6]  Christian Downie,et al.  Mobile phones and the consumer kids , 2007 .

[7]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  Recent advances in research on radiofrequency fields and health. , 2001, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[8]  R. Croft,et al.  The acute effects of d-amphetamine and methamphetamine on attention and psychomotor performance , 2006, Psychopharmacology.

[9]  Matti Laine,et al.  Effects of 902 MHz electromagnetic field emitted by cellular telephones on response times in humans , 2000, Neuroreport.

[10]  M Koivisto,et al.  Effects of electromagnetic field emitted by cellular phones on the EEG during a memory task , 2000, Neuroreport.

[11]  Leeka Kheifets,et al.  The Sensitivity of Children to Electromagnetic Fields , 2005, Pediatrics.

[12]  David Shum,et al.  Attentional problems in children born very preterm or with extremely low birth weight at 7-9 years. , 2008, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[13]  E Cardis,et al.  Validation of short term recall of mobile phone use for the Interphone study , 2006, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[14]  Paul Maruff,et al.  Repeated Assessment of Cognition in Children and the Measurement of Performance Change , 2005, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[15]  J. Wiart,et al.  Variability analysis of SAR from 20 MHz to 2.4 GHz for different adult and child models using finite-difference time-domain , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Geza Benke,et al.  Comparison of measuring instruments for radiofrequency radiation from mobile telephones in epidemiological studies: Implications for exposure assessment , 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[17]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[18]  Susanna Lagorio,et al.  Recall bias in the assessment of exposure to mobile phones , 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[19]  J. Olsen,et al.  Mobiles phones and health , 2009, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[20]  Matti Laine,et al.  Electromagnetic field emitted by 902 MHz mobile phones shows no effects on children's cognitive function , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[21]  A W Preece,et al.  Effect of a 915-MHz simulated mobile phone signal on cognitive function in man. , 1999, International journal of radiation biology.

[22]  P. Maruff,et al.  Qualitative similarities in cognitive impairment associated with 24 h of sustained wakefulness and a blood alcohol concentration of 0.05% , 2003, Journal of sleep research.

[23]  A Barth,et al.  A meta-analysis for neurobehavioural effects due to electromagnetic field exposure emitted by GSM mobile phones , 2007, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[24]  A. Preece,et al.  Effect of 902 MHz mobile phone transmission on cognitive function in children , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[25]  Kjell Hansson Mild,et al.  Ownership and use of wireless telephones: a population-based study of Swedish children aged 7–14 years , 2007, BMC public health.

[26]  J. Wiart,et al.  Modeling of RF head exposure in children , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[27]  C Stough,et al.  The effect of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on the alpha rhythm of human electroencephalogram , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.