Design and evaluation of steering protection for avoiding collisions during a lane change

This paper discusses the design of a driver assistance system for avoiding collisions with vehicles in blind spots. The following three types of support systems are compared: (1) a warning system that provides the driver with an auditory alert, (2) a ‘soft’ protection system that makes the steering wheel stiffer to tell the driver that a lane-change manoeuvre is not recommended and (3) a ‘hard’ protection system that cancels the driver's input and controls the tyre angle autonomously to prevent lane departure. The results of an experiment showed that the hard protection system was more effective for collision avoidance than either the warning or the soft protection system. The warning and soft protection systems were almost the same in terms of collision avoidance. The results suggest that the human-centred automation principle, which requires the human to have the final authority over the automation, can be violated depending on the context. Practitioner Summary: This paper compared three types of driver assistance systems for avoiding collisions with vehicles in blind spots: a warning system, soft protection system and hard protection system. The ‘hard’ protection system was the most effective for maintaining safety and was as readily accepted by drivers as the soft protection system was.

[1]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[2]  James B Roseborough Aiding human operators with state estimates , 1988 .

[3]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Frank Flemisch,et al.  Automation spectrum, inner / outer compatibility and other potentially useful human factors concepts for assistance and automation , 2008 .

[5]  Mehrdad Hosseini Zadeh,et al.  Blind-Spot Detection and Avoidance Utilizing In-Vehicle Haptic Feedback Force Feedback , 2011 .

[6]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Driving automation: Learning from aviation about design philosophies , 2007 .

[7]  M. Itoh,et al.  Dynamic angling side-view mirror for supporting recognition of a vehicle in the blind spot , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems.

[8]  John E. Deaton,et al.  Theory and Design of Adaptive Automation in Aviation Systems , 1992 .

[9]  Mattias Bengtsson,et al.  Collision Warning with Full Auto Brake and Pedestrian Detection - a practical example of Automatic Emergency Braking , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[10]  N. Moray,et al.  Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. , 2000 .

[11]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  Trust, Self-Confidence and Authority in Human-Machine Systems , 1998 .

[12]  K Hiramatsu,et al.  DESIGN PRINCIPLES OF THE ADVANCED SAFETY VEHICLE , 2000 .

[13]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[14]  Mark Mulder,et al.  Exploring the Dimensions of Haptic Feedback Support in Manual Control , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[15]  Rolf Isermann,et al.  Collision-avoidance systems PRORETA: Situation analysis and intervention control , 2010 .

[16]  Charles E. Billings,et al.  Aviation Automation: The Search for A Human-centered Approach , 1996 .

[17]  Masahiro Kobayashi,et al.  A Blind Spot Assistance System Based on Direct Yaw-Moment Control , 2011 .

[18]  Lotta Jakobsson,et al.  City Safety - A System Addressing Rear-End Collisions at Low Speeds , 2009 .

[19]  B. Rouse William,et al.  Adaptive Aiding for Human/Computer Control , 1988 .

[20]  Toshiyuki Inagaki Situation-Adaptive Autonomy for Time-Critical Takeoff Decisions , 2000 .

[21]  Glenn F. Wilson,et al.  Performance Enhancement in an Uninhabited Air Vehicle Task Using Psychophysiologically Determined Adaptive Aiding , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[22]  Toshiyuki Inagaki,et al.  Authority and responsibility in human–machine systems: probability theoretic validation of machine-initiated trading of authority , 2011, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[23]  Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al.  Situation Assessment of an Autonomous Emergency Brake for Arbitrary Vehicle-to-Vehicle Collision Scenarios , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[24]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  Preparing drivers for dangerous situations: A critical reflection on continuous shared control , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[25]  René van Paassen,et al.  Reducing steering wheel stiffness is beneficial in supporting evasive maneuvers , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[26]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Designing for Flexible Interaction Between Humans and Automation: Delegation Interfaces for Supervisory Control , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[27]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system. , 2013, Applied ergonomics.

[28]  Makoto Itoh,et al.  Support by Warning or by Action: Which is Appropriate under Mismatches between Driver Intent and Traffic Conditions? , 2007, IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci..

[29]  Thomas B. Sheridan Human centered automation: oxymoron or common sense? , 1995, 1995 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century.

[30]  Mark W. Scerbo,et al.  Effects of a Psychophysiological System for Adaptive Automation on Performance, Workload, and the Event-Related Potential P300 Component , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[31]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task , 2004 .

[32]  M. Itoh,et al.  Effectiveness of a blind spot visualization system with a video camera for safe lane changes , 2012, 2012 Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference (SICE).

[33]  Toshiyuki Inagaki,et al.  Adaptive Automation: Sharing and Trading of Control , 2001 .

[34]  Matteo Corno,et al.  Road-Departure Prevention in an Emergency Obstacle Avoidance Situation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[35]  Irene Mavrommati,et al.  Design principles , 2001 .