Is Time Ripe for an Ethic of Quantification?

Looking at present-day technoscience, where utopian ambitions and dystopian fears confront one another, quantification plays a fundamental role. Artificial intelligence, big data, statistical, mathematical, and metrical objects share important promises, as well as important pathologies. From finance to education, from the economy to the environment, we increasingly use numbers and algorithms to increase efficiency and profit, measure the speed of achieving objectives, to classify and decide. Without an awareness of this multidimensional phenomenon, no answer is possible. A critical movement is needed, to control a sociotechnical imaginary for which technology provides the solution to the problems created by technology. Is time ripe for an ethics of quantification?

[1]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model‐Based Environmental Assessment: The NUSAP System , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Paul Pfleiderer,et al.  Chameleons: The Misuse of Theoretical Models in Finance and Economics , 2014, Economica.

[3]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  A global observatory for gene editing. , 2018 .

[4]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  Ethics of quantification or quantification of ethics? , 2020 .

[5]  S. Gupta.  Avoiding ambiguity: Scientist sometimes use mathematics to give the illusion of certainty , 2001 .

[6]  Christopher J. Lynch,et al.  Observations on the practice and profession of modeling and simulation: A survey approach , 2018, Simul..

[7]  S. Foucart,et al.  Les gardiens de la raison , 2020 .

[8]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Quantitative Storytelling in the Making of a Composite Indicator , 2020, Social Indicators Research.

[9]  E. Berman,et al.  The Sociology of Quantification: Where Are We Now? , 2018 .

[10]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Climate Models as Economic Guides: Scientific Challenge or Quixotic Quest? , 2015 .

[11]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Why science’s crisis should not become a political battling ground , 2018, Futures.

[12]  Monica Di Fiore,et al.  From sociology of quantification to ethics of quantification , 2020, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.

[13]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  What do I make of your Latinorum? Sensitivity auditing of mathematical modelling. , 2012, 1211.2668.

[14]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy , 1990 .

[15]  J. Hobson.  Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress , 2019, Occupational Medicine.

[16]  Pablo J. Boczkowski,et al.  The Relevance of Algorithms , 2013 .

[17]  Silvio Funtowicz,et al.  What is science’s crisis really about? , 2017 .

[18]  A. Biggeri,et al.  [Post-Normal Pandemics: why CoViD-19 requires a new approach to science.] , 2020, Recenti progressi in medicina.

[19]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Thinking critically about and researching algorithms , 2014, The Social Power of Algorithms.

[20]  Robert A. Kowalski,et al.  Algorithm = logic + control , 1979, CACM.

[21]  Paul M. Romer,et al.  Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth , 2015 .

[22]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science, Philosophy and Sustainability : The End of the Cartesian dream , 2015 .

[23]  N. Lazar,et al.  The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose , 2016 .

[24]  Richard McElreath,et al.  The natural selection of bad science , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[25]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power , 2015 .

[26]  Giorgio Tintino.  From Darwinian to technological evolution: forgetting the human lottery. , 2014, Cuadernos de bioetica : revista oficial de la Asociacion Espanola de Bioetica y Etica Medica.

[27]  E. Reinert.  Full circle: economics from scholasticism through innovation and back into mathematical scholasticism: Reflections on a 1769 Price essay: “Why is it that economics so far has gained so few advantages from physics and mathematics?” , 2000 .

[28]  Funny Numbers , 2020, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[29]  Antoinette Rouvroy,et al.  Algorithmic governmentality and prospects of emancipation , 2013 .

[30]  T. Walter,et al.  The assault of financial futures on the rest of time , 2020 .

[31]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science , 2003 .

[32]  Philip B. Stark,et al.  Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto , 2020, Nature.

[33]  Deborah G. Mayo,et al.  Statistical Inference as Severe Testing , 2018 .

[34]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  The technique is never neutral. How methodological choices condition the generation of narratives for sustainability , 2020, Environmental Science & Policy.

[35]  J. Feldman.  Condorcet et la mathématique sociale. Enthousiasmes et bémols , 2005 .

[36]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[37]  P. Boulanger,et al.  Technoscience, policy and the new media. Nexus or vortex? , 2020 .

[38]  Sylvain Laurens.  Lobbyists and Bureaucrats in Brussels: Capitalism’s Brokers , 2017 .

[39]  Samuele Lo Piano,et al.  Ethical principles in machine learning and artificial intelligence: cases from the field and possible ways forward , 2020 .

[40]  Philip B. Stark,et al.  Cargo‐cult statistics and scientific crisis , 2018, Significance.