Biconvex versus bilinear force-penetration relationship in percussive drilling of rock

Abstract Because of variability of the force vs. penetration relationship (FPR) from one blow to another in percussive drilling, and difficulty to predict FPRs under such conditions, use is commonly made of simple FPR models, such as the bilinear one defined by its loading/unloading slopes. Here a biconvex model with an added parameter representing convexity is considered. One aim is to study the effect of convexity on maximal penetration, maximal force and efficiency. Another is to assess, with the biconvex FPR as an example, how well a bilinear FPR can be used to approximate one that is nonlinear. A simple percussive top-hammer drill model is considered, comprising a hammer, a drill rod and a bit with the same characteristic impedance. The maximal penetration is found to decrease and the maximal force to increase with increasing convexity. The efficiency has a maximum for a finite hammer length (incident wave duration), and the highest maximal efficiency is obtained for a linear FPR. With increasing convexity, the maximal efficiency decreases and occurs for shorter hammers (incident waves). The bilinear approximation of a biconvex FPR accurately predicts the position of the maximum in efficiency, even for large convexity, but somewhat overestimates its height and width.

[1]  Karl-Gustaf Sundin,et al.  Experimental study of a percussive process for rock fragmentation , 1989 .

[2]  Bengt Lundberg,et al.  Analysis of elastic waves from two-point strain measurement , 1977 .

[3]  M. Okrouhlík,et al.  Influence of 3D effects on the efficiency of percussive rock drilling , 2001 .

[4]  R. Simon Transfer of the stress wave energy in the drill steel of a percussive drill to the rock , 1964 .

[5]  M. Koizumi,et al.  Force-penetration curves of a button bit generated during impact penetration into rock , 2015 .

[6]  B. Lundberg,et al.  Energy transfer in percussive rock destruction—I: Comparison of percussive methods , 1973 .

[7]  B. Lundberg Energy transfer in percussive rock destruction—II: Supplement on hammer drilling , 1973 .

[8]  Timo Saksala,et al.  Numerical and experimental study of percussive drilling with a triple-button bit on Kuru granite , 2014 .

[9]  Bengt Lundberg,et al.  Computer Modelling and Simulation of Percussive Drilling of Rock , 1993 .

[10]  P. K. Dutta,et al.  A theory of percussive drill bit penetration , 1972 .

[11]  D. Sikarskie,et al.  On the penetration of rock by three-dimensional indentors , 1968 .

[12]  Karl-Gustaf Sundin,et al.  A method for determination of in-hole dynamic force-penetration data from two-point strain measurement on a percussive drill rod , 1990 .

[13]  Charles Fairhurst,et al.  A theoretical and experimental study of the percussive drilling of rock Part II—force-penetration and specific energy determinations , 1971 .

[14]  Karl-Gustaf Sundin,et al.  Analysis of elastic waves in non-uniform rods from two-point strain measurement , 1990 .

[16]  M. Okrouhlík,et al.  Efficiency of a percussive rock drilling process with consideration of wave energy radiation into the rock , 2006 .

[17]  Pierre Collet,et al.  Optimal wave with respect to efficiency in percussive drilling with integral drill steel , 2010 .