Comparison of web-based versus paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire: effects on health indicators in Dutch adolescents.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J Brug,et al. The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.
[2] M K Serdula,et al. Effects of question order on estimates of the prevalence of attempted weight loss. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.
[3] Sean Esteban McCabe,et al. Mode effects for collecting alcohol and tobacco data among 3rd and 4th grade students: a randomized pilot study of Web-form versus paper-form surveys. , 2005, Addictive behaviors.
[4] L. Saxe,et al. A comparison of paper vs computer-assisted self interview for school alcohol, tobacco, and other drug surveys , 2000 .
[5] Chuhsing Kate Hsiao,et al. Survey of substance use among high school students in Taipei: web-based questionnaire versus paper-and-pencil questionnaire. , 2005, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.
[6] J. Fortenberry,et al. Comparability of a computer-assisted versus written method for collecting health behavior information from adolescent patients. , 1999, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.
[7] Harry J de Koning,et al. Internet versus paper mode of health and health behavior questionnaires in elementary schools: asthma and fruit as examples. , 2006, The Journal of school health.
[8] G. Bonsel,et al. Reliability and validity of the child health questionnaire-child form (CHQ-CF87) in a Dutch adolescent population , 2002, Quality of Life Research.
[9] J. Billy,et al. Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. , 2003, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.
[10] M. Melzer-Lange,et al. Assessment of trauma symptoms among adolescent assault victims. , 2005, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.
[11] Tom W. Smith,et al. ASKING SENSITIVE QUESTIONS THE IMPACT OF DATA COLLECTION MODE, QUESTION FORMAT, AND QUESTION CONTEXT , 1996 .
[12] M. Rosenberg. Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .
[13] R. Loeber,et al. Multiple Gating: A Multistage Assessment Procedure for Identifying Youths at Risk for Delinquency , 1984 .
[14] W. Aquilino,et al. A Comparison of Computer-Assisted and Paper-and-Pencil Self-Administered Questionnaires in a Survey on Smoking, Alcohol, and Drug Use , 1998 .
[15] S. M. Rogers,et al. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. , 1998, Science.
[16] Lea Maes,et al. Comparison of a computer-administered and paper-and-pencil-administered questionnaire on health and lifestyle behaviors. , 2006, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.
[17] R. Goodman,et al. Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) , 2003, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.
[18] A. Bowling. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. , 2005, Journal of public health.
[19] R. Steve McCallum,et al. A comparison of the pencil-and-paper and computer-administered Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–Adolescent , 2005 .
[20] D. Dillman. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .
[21] James A. McRae,et al. An Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews in a School Setting , 1998 .
[22] S L Hammar,et al. Computer-assisted detection and intervention in adolescent high-risk health behaviors. , 1990, The Journal of pediatrics.
[23] H. Minnis,et al. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire , 2003, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.