Comparison of web-based versus paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire: effects on health indicators in Dutch adolescents.

Because of the many advantages, computerized questionnaires are used more often in youth surveys, replacing the more traditional paper-and-pencil (pp Bowling 2005), it is important to determine whether responses to computerized questionnaires are comparable to those obtained by paper-and-pencil method. So far, findings from previous studies among school-aged children and adolescents are inconclusive. Several studies did not find major differences between computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires (Truman et al. 2003; Hays and McCallum 2005; Mangunkusumo et al. 2005, 2006; McCabe et al. 2005), whereas other studies showed that adolescents disclose more sensitive information in computerized questionnaires than in paper-and-pencil conditions (Paperny et al. 1990; Turner et al. 1998; Wright, Aquilino, and Supple 1998; Wang et al. 2005) or found (gender-related) differences for some topics (Beebe et al. 1998; Webb et al. 1999; Hallfors et al. 2000; Vereecken and Maes 2006). Of these studies, a few were web-based (Mangunkusumo et al. 2005, 2006; McCabe et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2005). Several factors may be responsible for the differences found in these studies. It is known that the validity of self-reports may be affected by cognitive as well as situational factors. Factors considered especially influential include the presence of others while responding to questions and the respondents’ perceptions of privacy or confidentiality (Brener, Billy, and Grady 2003; Bowling 2005). A perceived lack of privacy or confidentiality could cause response bias because of a fear of reprisal. In particular, behavior that is illegal, stigmatized, or laden with moral implications may be underreported because of this concern (Brener et al. 2003). As the setting of computerized administration of questionnaires at schools is likely to be different from the administration of paper-and-pencil questionnaires, it is important to investigate respondents’ perceived level of privacy and confidentiality as a possible source of response bias. However, little is known about adolescents’ perceived level of privacy and confidentiality in surveys. Because of this and the inconsistent pattern that appears from the literature, the following issues were examined in the present study: (a) (gender-related) differences in perceived level of privacy and confidentiality between web-based and paper-and-pencil questionnaires and (b) (gender-related) differences in the report of indicators of (mental) health and behavior between web-based and paper-and-pencil questionnaires when taking into account pupils’ perceived level of privacy and confidentiality.

[1]  J Brug,et al.  The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[2]  M K Serdula,et al.  Effects of question order on estimates of the prevalence of attempted weight loss. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Sean Esteban McCabe,et al.  Mode effects for collecting alcohol and tobacco data among 3rd and 4th grade students: a randomized pilot study of Web-form versus paper-form surveys. , 2005, Addictive behaviors.

[4]  L. Saxe,et al.  A comparison of paper vs computer-assisted self interview for school alcohol, tobacco, and other drug surveys , 2000 .

[5]  Chuhsing Kate Hsiao,et al.  Survey of substance use among high school students in Taipei: web-based questionnaire versus paper-and-pencil questionnaire. , 2005, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[6]  J. Fortenberry,et al.  Comparability of a computer-assisted versus written method for collecting health behavior information from adolescent patients. , 1999, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[7]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Internet versus paper mode of health and health behavior questionnaires in elementary schools: asthma and fruit as examples. , 2006, The Journal of school health.

[8]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Reliability and validity of the child health questionnaire-child form (CHQ-CF87) in a Dutch adolescent population , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[9]  J. Billy,et al.  Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. , 2003, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[10]  M. Melzer-Lange,et al.  Assessment of trauma symptoms among adolescent assault victims. , 2005, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[11]  Tom W. Smith,et al.  ASKING SENSITIVE QUESTIONS THE IMPACT OF DATA COLLECTION MODE, QUESTION FORMAT, AND QUESTION CONTEXT , 1996 .

[12]  M. Rosenberg Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[13]  R. Loeber,et al.  Multiple Gating: A Multistage Assessment Procedure for Identifying Youths at Risk for Delinquency , 1984 .

[14]  W. Aquilino,et al.  A Comparison of Computer-Assisted and Paper-and-Pencil Self-Administered Questionnaires in a Survey on Smoking, Alcohol, and Drug Use , 1998 .

[15]  S. M. Rogers,et al.  Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. , 1998, Science.

[16]  Lea Maes,et al.  Comparison of a computer-administered and paper-and-pencil-administered questionnaire on health and lifestyle behaviors. , 2006, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[17]  R. Goodman,et al.  Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) , 2003, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[18]  A. Bowling Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. , 2005, Journal of public health.

[19]  R. Steve McCallum,et al.  A comparison of the pencil-and-paper and computer-administered Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–Adolescent , 2005 .

[20]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[21]  James A. McRae,et al.  An Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews in a School Setting , 1998 .

[22]  S L Hammar,et al.  Computer-assisted detection and intervention in adolescent high-risk health behaviors. , 1990, The Journal of pediatrics.

[23]  H. Minnis,et al.  The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire , 2003, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.