Temporal discounting when the choice is between two delayed rewards.

The present experiments extend the temporal discounting paradigm from choice between an immediate and a delayed reward to choice between 2 delayed rewards: a smaller amount of money available sooner and a larger amount available later. Across different amounts and delays, the data were consistently well described by a hyperbola-like discounting function, and the degree of discounting decreased systematically as the delay to the sooner reward increased. Three theoretical models (the elimination-by-aspects, present-value comparison, and common-aspect attenuation hypotheses) were evaluated. The best account of the data was provided by the common-aspect attenuation hypothesis, according to which the common aspect of the choice alternatives (i.e., the time until the sooner reward is available) receives less weight in the decision-making process.

[1]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[3]  L. Green,et al.  Preference reversal and self control: choice as a function of reward amount and delay , 1981 .

[4]  J. E. Mazur.  An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .

[5]  M. Commons.  The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value , 2013 .

[6]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Decision making over time and under uncertainty: a common approach , 1991 .

[7]  G. Ainslie.  Picoeconomics: The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States within the Person , 1992 .

[8]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation , 1992 .

[9]  L. Green,et al.  Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  K. Kirby,et al.  Bidding on the Future: Evidence Against Normative Discounting of Delayed Rewards , 1997 .

[12]  L. Green,et al.  Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[13]  L Green,et al.  Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  Reliability of a Measure of Temporal Discounting , 2000 .

[15]  H. Rachlin.  The Science of Self-Control , 2004 .

[16]  L. Green,et al.  Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. , 2001, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  Joel Myerson,et al.  Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Discounting Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards , 2002 .

[18]  Warren K Bickel,et al.  Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. , 2002, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  G. Madden,et al.  Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. , 2003, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[20]  L. Green,et al.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .