Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study.

BACKGROUND The rapid increase in mobile telephone use has generated concern about possible health risks related to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from this technology. METHODS An interview-based case-control study with 2708 glioma and 2409 meningioma cases and matched controls was conducted in 13 countries using a common protocol. RESULTS A reduced odds ratio (OR) related to ever having been a regular mobile phone user was seen for glioma [OR 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.94] and meningioma (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.68-0.91), possibly reflecting participation bias or other methodological limitations. No elevated OR was observed > or =10 years after first phone use (glioma: OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.76-1.26; meningioma: OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.61-1.14). ORs were <1.0 for all deciles of lifetime number of phone calls and nine deciles of cumulative call time. In the 10th decile of recalled cumulative call time, > or =1640 h, the OR was 1.40 (95% CI 1.03-1.89) for glioma, and 1.15 (95% CI 0.81-1.62) for meningioma; but there are implausible values of reported use in this group. ORs for glioma tended to be greater in the temporal lobe than in other lobes of the brain, but the CIs around the lobe-specific estimates were wide. ORs for glioma tended to be greater in subjects who reported usual phone use on the same side of the head as their tumour than on the opposite side. CONCLUSIONS Overall, no increase in risk of glioma or meningioma was observed with use of mobile phones. There were suggestions of an increased risk of glioma at the highest exposure levels, but biases and error prevent a causal interpretation. The possible effects of long-term heavy use of mobile phones require further investigation.

[1]  Tanielle Lobo Royal London Hospital , 2012 .

[2]  Tinyiko Ndhlovu,et al.  The use of mobile phones , 2011 .

[3]  Gyógyszerészet National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery , 2011 .

[4]  Anssi Auvinen,et al.  Time trends in brain tumor incidence rates in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, 1974-2003. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  Leeka Kheifets,et al.  Epidemiologic Evidence on Mobile Phones and Tumor Risk: A Review , 2009, Epidemiology.

[6]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  Quantifying the impact of selection bias caused by nonparticipation in a case-control study of mobile phone use. , 2009, Annals of epidemiology.

[7]  N. Pearce,et al.  Commentary: Observational studies may conceal a weakly elevated risk under the appearance of consistently reduced risks. , 2008, International journal of epidemiology.

[8]  M Feychting,et al.  Meningioma and mobile phone use--a collaborative case-control study in five North European countries. , 2008, International journal of epidemiology.

[9]  L. S. Schmidt,et al.  Social inequality and incidence of and survival from tumours of the central nervous system in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994-2003. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[10]  E Cardis,et al.  Distribution of RF energy emitted by mobile phones in anatomical structures of the brain , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Susanna Lagorio,et al.  Recall bias in the assessment of exposure to mobile phones , 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[12]  M Taki,et al.  Mobile phone use, exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic field, and brain tumour: a case–control study , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Téléphone mobile, risque de tumeurs cérébrales et du nerf vestibuloacoustique: l'étude cas-témoins INTERPHONE en France , 2007 .

[14]  Naohito Yamaguchi,et al.  The INTERPHONE study: design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population , 2007, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[15]  Anssi Auvinen,et al.  Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[16]  Tore Tynes,et al.  Use of mobile phones in Norway and risk of intracranial tumours , 2007, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[17]  M. Röösli,et al.  Cellular telephone use and time trends in brain tumour mortality in Switzerland from 1969 to 2002 , 2007, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[18]  E. Cardis,et al.  [Cell Phones and Risk of brain and acoustic nerve tumours: the French INTERPHONE case-control study]. , 2007, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[19]  F. Shellock,et al.  Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: in vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation at 1.5-tesla. , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[20]  John D Boice,et al.  Cellular telephone use and cancer risk: update of a nationwide Danish cohort. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  Kjell Hansson Mild,et al.  Tumour risk associated with use of cellular telephones or cordless desktop telephones , 2006, World journal of surgical oncology.

[22]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk , 2006, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[23]  E Cardis,et al.  Validation of short term recall of mobile phone use for the Interphone study , 2006, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[24]  Kjell Hansson Mild,et al.  Pooled analysis of two case–control studies on use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours diagnosed in 1997–2003 , 2006, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[25]  Maria Blettner,et al.  Cellular phones, cordless phones, and the risks of glioma and meningioma (Interphone Study Group, Germany). , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  D. Juran,et al.  Cellular telephones and risk for brain tumors: A population-based, incident case-control study , 2006, Neurology.

[27]  K. Hansson Mild,et al.  Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on the use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk of benign brain tumours diagnosed during 1997-2003. , 2006, International journal of oncology.

[28]  K. Muir,et al.  Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in adults: case-control study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  S. Preston‐Martin,et al.  A population‐based description of glioblastoma multiforme in Los Angeles County, 1974–1999 , 2005, Cancer.

[30]  Per Hall,et al.  Long-term mobile phone use and brain tumor risk. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.

[31]  A. Ahlbom,et al.  Prior Hospitalization for Epilepsy, Diabetes, and Stroke and Subsequent Glioma and Meningioma Risk , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[32]  M. Nadi,et al.  Implantable defibrillators immunity to low frequency led electromagnetic disturbances , 2005 .

[33]  M. Burns,et al.  Case-Control Study , 2020, Definitions.

[34]  Maria A. Stuchly,et al.  Pacemaker interference by magnetic fields at power line frequencies , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Anssi Auvinen,et al.  Brain Tumors and Salivary Gland Cancers Among Cellular Telephone Users , 2002, Epidemiology.

[36]  P. Simpson,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research , 2001, Journal of surgical oncology.

[37]  J. Olsen,et al.  Cellular telephones and cancer--a nationwide cohort study in Denmark. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[38]  P. Black,et al.  Cellular-telephone use and brain tumors. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  A. Scholten, J. Silny,et al.  The interference threshold of unipolar cardiac pacemakers in extremely low frequency magnetic fields , 2001, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[40]  A. Neugut,et al.  Handheld cellular telephone use and risk of brain cancer. , 2000, JAMA.

[41]  Maria A. Stuchly,et al.  Pacemaker interference and low-frequency electric induction in humans by external fields and electrodes , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  J. Mugica,et al.  Study of Interactions Between Permanent Pacemakers and Electronic Antitheft Surveillance Systems , 2000, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[43]  K J Rothman,et al.  Cause-specific mortality in cellular telephone users. , 1999, JAMA.

[44]  K. H. Mild,et al.  Use of cellular telephones and the risk for brain tumours: A case-control study. , 1999, International journal of oncology.

[45]  G. Trevi,et al.  Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cellular Telephones: Is There Any Interference? , 1999, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[46]  Monique F. Kilkenny,et al.  International case-control study of adult brain, head and neck tumours : Results of the feasibility study , 1999 .

[47]  M. Repacholi Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs. , 1998, Bioelectromagnetics.

[48]  S. Saksena,et al.  Interaction Between Electronic Article Surveillance Systems and Implantable Defibrillators: Insights from a Fourth Generation ICD , 1997, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[49]  M. Stanton,et al.  Electromagnetic interference from welding and motors on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators as tested in the electrically hostile work site. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[50]  B. Naegeli,et al.  Intermittent pacemaker dysfunction caused by digital mobile telephones. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[51]  M E McIvor,et al.  Environmental Electromagnetic Interference from Electronic Article Surveillance Devices: Interactions with an ICD , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[52]  P Maisonneuve,et al.  Interpretation and analysis of differential exposure variability and zero-exposure categories for continuous exposures. , 1995, Epidemiology.

[53]  D. Loomis,et al.  Varied Forms of Bias Due to Nondifferential Error in Measuring Exposure , 1994, Epidemiology.

[54]  N. Birkett,et al.  Effect of nondifferential misclassification on estimates of odds ratios with multiple levels of exposure. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[55]  Mustafa Dosemeci,et al.  RE: “DOES NONDIFFERENTIAL MISCLASSIFICATION OF EXPOSURE ALWAYS BIAS A TRUE EFFECT TOWARD THE NULL VALUE?” , 1991 .

[56]  M Dosemeci,et al.  Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value? , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[57]  S Greenland,et al.  The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[58]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research: volume 1- The analysis of case-control studies , 1980 .

[59]  W. Shearnian Charing Cross Hospital. , 1836, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[60]  C. Cooper,et al.  Addenbrooke's Hospital , 1898, The Hospital.

[61]  H. Burdett ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S HOSPITAL , 1903, British medical journal.

[62]  W. Brinton ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL , 1856, Association medical journal.