Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election

In the 2016 US presidential election campaign, social media platforms were increasingly used as direct sources of news, bypassing the editorial media. With the candidates’ millions of followers, Twitter has become a platform for mass communication and the candidate’s main online information channel. Likewise, social media has provided a platform for debating and critiquing the mainstream media by the campaigns and their networks. This article discusses the Twitter strategies of the democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and republican candidate Donald Trump during their US 2016 presidential election campaigns. While the Clinton campaign’s strategy confirms theories regarding the professionalisation of election campaigns, the Trump campaign’s more amateurish yet authentic style in social media points towards de-professionalisation and even amateurism as a counter-trend in political communication.

[1]  Emily Harmer.  Performing Politics: Media Interviews, Debates and Press Conferences , 2018, European Journal of Communication.

[2]  Gunn Enli,et al.  The End of Television—Again! How TV Is Still Influenced by Cultural Factors in the Age of Digital Intermediaries , 2016 .

[3]  Daniel Kreiss,et al.  Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle , 2016, New Media Soc..

[4]  Lars Nyre.  Gunn Enli: Mediated Authenticity. How the Media Constructs Reality , 2016 .

[5]  Daniel Kreiss,et al.  The Tech Industry Meets Presidential Politics: Explaining the Democratic Party’s Technological Advantage in Electoral Campaigning, 2004–2012 , 2016 .

[6]  Gunn Enli,et al.  Social Media Incumbent Advantage: Barack Obama's and Mitt Romney's Tweets in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign , 2016 .

[7]  A. Bruns,et al.  May the best Tweeter win : The Twitter strategies of key campaign accounts in the 2012 US election , 2016 .

[8]  Ø. Ihlen,et al.  Birds of a feather flock together? Party leaders on Twitter during the 2013 Norwegian elections , 2015 .

[9]  L. Tummers.  LEARNING WHILE GOVERNING: EXPERTISE AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH , 2014 .

[10]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age , 2014 .

[11]  Guy S. Reel.  Hillary Clinton in the News: Gender and Authenticity in American Politics , 2014 .

[12]  Caitlin Evans Wagner,et al.  The hybrid media system: Politics and power , 2014, New Media Soc..

[13]  Mary F. E. Ebeling.  Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns , 2013 .

[14]  G. Enli,et al.  PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGNS IN PARTY-CENTRED POLITICS , 2013 .

[15]  Rune Karlsen,et al.  Obama's Online Success and European Party Organizations: Adoption and Adaptation of U.S. Online Practices in the Norwegian Labor Party , 2013 .

[16]  Kevin Wallsten,et al.  Old Media, New Media Sources: The Blogosphere's Influence on Print Media News Coverage , 2013, Int. J. E Politics.

[17]  S. Davidson.  Campaign Communication and Political Marketing , 2013 .

[18]  M. Broersma,et al.  BETWEEN BROADCASTING POLITICAL MESSAGES AND INTERACTING WITH VOTERS , 2012 .

[19]  Daniel Kreiss.  Taking Our Country Back: The Crafting of Networked Politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama , 2012 .

[20]  Lynn Vavreck.  The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns , 2009 .

[21]  Ted Brader,et al.  The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation - By Drew Westen , 2008 .

[22]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[23]  Drew Westen,et al.  The political brain: The role of emotion in deciding the fate of the nation. , 2007 .

[24]  S. Schneider.  NEW MEDIA CAMPAIGNS AND THE MANAGED CITIZEN , 2007 .

[25]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Interactivity-as-Product and Interactivity-as-Process , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[26]  D. Lilleker,et al.  The Professionalization of Political Communication , 2002 .

[27]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley.  On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It , 2000 .

[28]  J. Blumler,et al.  The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features , 1999 .

[29]  B. Barber.  Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy , 1998 .

[30]  R. L. Savage,et al.  Candidates and their images: Concepts, methods, and findings , 1976 .