Use of the Blue Button Online Tool for Sharing Health Information: Qualitative Interviews With Patients and Providers

Background Information sharing between providers is critical for care coordination, especially in health systems such as the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), where many patients also receive care from other health care organizations. Patients can facilitate this sharing by using the Blue Button, an online tool that promotes patients’ ability to view, print, and download their health records. Objective The aim of this study was to characterize (1) patients’ use of Blue Button, an online information-sharing tool in VA’s patient portal, My HealtheVet, (2) information-sharing practices between VA and non-VA providers, and (3) how providers and patients use a printed Blue Button report during a clinical visit. Methods Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 34 VA patients, 10 VA providers, and 9 non-VA providers. Interviews focused on patients’ use of Blue Button, information-sharing practices between VA and non-VA providers, and how patients and providers use a printed Blue Button report during a clinical visit. Qualitative themes were identified through iterative rounds of coding starting with an a priori schema based on technology adoption theory. Results Information sharing between VA and non-VA providers relied primarily on the patient. Patients most commonly used Blue Button to access and share VA laboratory results. Providers recognized the need for improved information sharing, valued the Blue Button printout, and expressed interest in a way to share information electronically across settings. Conclusions Consumer-oriented technologies such as Blue Button can facilitate patients sharing health information with providers in other health care systems; however, more education is needed to inform patients of this use to facilitate care coordination. Additional research is needed to explore how personal health record documents, such as Blue Button reports, can be easily shared and incorporated into the clinical workflow of providers.

[1]  P. Kaboli,et al.  Considering the Issue of Dual Use in Veterans Affairs Patients: Implications & Opportunities for Improved Communication & Counseling , 2015, Health communication.

[2]  D. Baker,et al.  Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. , 2007, JAMA.

[3]  Bridget A. Stewart,et al.  A preliminary look at duplicate testing associated with lack of electronic health record interoperability for transferred patients , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Moira C McKinnon,et al.  Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 7: Care Coordination) , 2007 .

[5]  J. Ancker,et al.  The Invisible Work of Personal Health Information Management Among People With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Qualitative Interview Study Among Patients and Providers , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  David W. Bates,et al.  White Paper: Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  Thomas R. Miller,et al.  Dual use of Medicare and the Veterans Health Administration: are there adverse health outcomes? , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[8]  Claudia H. Williams,et al.  From the Office of the National Coordinator: the strategy for advancing the exchange of health information. , 2012, Health affairs.

[9]  Einer Elhauge,et al.  The Fragmentation of U.S. Health Care , 2010 .

[10]  David C. Chan,et al.  Improving safety and eliminating redundant tests: cutting costs in U.S. hospitals. , 2009, Health affairs.

[11]  Genna R. Cohen,et al.  Are Electronic Medical Records Helpful for Care Coordination? Experiences of Physician Practices , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[13]  Guus Schrijvers,et al.  The Effects on Health Behavior and Health Outcomes of Internet-Based Asynchronous Communication Between Health Providers and Patients With a Chronic Condition: A Systematic Review , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  Health information exchange among U.S. hospitals: who's in, who's out, and why? , 2014, Healthcare.

[15]  Brian Fisher,et al.  How patients use access to their electronic GP record--a quantitative study. , 2011, Family practice.

[16]  Transitions in Dual Care for Veterans: Non-Federal Physician Perspectives , 2013, Journal of Community Health.

[17]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[18]  Susan S. Woods,et al.  Promise of and potential for patient-facing technologies to enable meaningful use. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[19]  Timothy P. Hogan,et al.  VA OpenNotes: exploring the experiences of early patient adopters with access to clinical notes , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  S. Woolf,et al.  How patients want to engage with their personal health record: a qualitative study , 2013, BMJ Open.

[21]  P. Woodbridge,et al.  Rural Veterans’ Perspectives of Dual Care , 2013, Journal of Community Health.

[22]  Steven R Simon,et al.  Technology-Assisted Patient Access to Clinical Information: An Evaluation Framework for Blue Button , 2014, JMIR research protocols.

[23]  D. Bates,et al.  Patient Perceptions of a Personal Health Record: A Test of the Diffusion of Innovation Model , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  Despite substantial progress In EHR adoption, health information exchange and patient engagement remain low in office settings. , 2014, Health affairs.

[25]  Gail Graham,et al.  Blue Button use by patients to access and share health record information using the Department of Veterans Affairs' online patient portal , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[26]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  David W. Bates,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Health Maintenance Reminders Provided Directly to Patients Through an Electronic PHR , 2011, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[28]  Joann G Elmore,et al.  Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors' Notes: A Quasi-experimental Study and a Look Ahead , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  C. Kruse,et al.  The Effect of Patient Portals on Quality Outcomes and Its Implications to Meaningful Use: A Systematic Review , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[30]  T. Bodenheimer.  Coordinating care--a perilous journey through the health care system. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Michal Rassin,et al.  Personal medical documents management--how patients perceive, keep and manage their medical documents: a qualitative study. , 2007, International journal of nursing studies.

[32]  Thomas A. Schwandt,et al.  Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation , 2007 .

[33]  Tejal K. Gandhi,et al.  Effects of an online personal health record on medication accuracy and safety: a cluster-randomized trial , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[34]  P. Duncan,et al.  Multiple System Utilization and Mortality for Veterans With Stroke , 2007, Stroke.

[35]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[36]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  Priority Areas for National Action , 2003 .

[37]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  Are Meaningful Use Stage 2 certified EHRs ready for interoperability? Findings from the SMART C-CDA Collaborative , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[38]  V. Mor,et al.  Duplicate federal payments for dual enrollees in Medicare Advantage plans and the Veterans Affairs health care system. , 2012, JAMA.