Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm?

ilbstract. Autocorrelation is a very general statistical property of ecological variables observed across geographic space; its most common forms are patches and gradients. Spatial autocorrelation. which comes either from the physical forcing of environmental variables or from community processes, presents a problem for statistical testing because autocorrelated data violate the assumption of independence of most standard statistical procedures. The paper discusses first how autocorrelation in ecological variables can be described and measured. with emphasis on mapping techniques. Then. proper statistical testing in the presence of autocorrelation is briefly discussed. Finally. ways are presented of explicitly introducing spatial structures into ecological models. Two approaches are proposed: in the raw-data approach, the spatial structure takes the form of a polynomial of the x and .v geographic coordinates of the sampling stations; in the matrix approach. the spatial structure is introduced in the form of a geographic distance matrix among locations. These two approaches are compared in the concluding section. A table provides a list of computer programs available for spatial analysis.

[1]  R. Wayne,et al.  Molecular genetic and morphological analyses of the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). , 1993, The Journal of heredity.

[2]  Derek A. Roff,et al.  DISTRIBUTION-FREE AND ROBUST STATISTICAL METHODS: VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO PARAMETRIC STATISTICS? , 1993 .

[3]  Pierre Dutilleul,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1993 .

[4]  T. Dayan,et al.  Canine carnassials: character displacement in the wolves, jackals and foxes of Israel , 1992 .

[5]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Study of spatial components of forest cover using partial Mantel tests and path analysis , 1992 .

[6]  P. Legendre,et al.  Mapping, Estimating Biomass, and Optimizing Sampling Programs for Spatially Autocorrelated Data: Case Study of the Northern Shrimp (Pandalus borealis) , 1992 .

[7]  Niles Lehman,et al.  A MORPHOLOGIC AND GENETIC STUDY OF THE ISLAND FOX, UROCYON LITTORALIS , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  Bernard Fingleton,et al.  Spatial Data Analysis by Example, Vol. 2: Categorical and Directional Data. , 1990 .

[9]  Mark Kot,et al.  Adaptation: Statistics and a Null Model for Estimating Phylogenetic Effects , 1990 .

[10]  S. Prater,et al.  The Book of Indian Animals , 1990 .

[11]  T. Dayan,et al.  Feline Canines: Community-Wide Character Displacement Among the Small Cats of Israel , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Daniel R. Brooks,et al.  Parsimony Analysis in Historical Biogeography and Coevolution: Methodological and Theoretical Update , 1990 .

[13]  A. Turner.  The evolution of the guild of larger terrestrial carnivores during the Plio-Pleistocene in Africa , 1990 .

[14]  J. Besag,et al.  Generalized Monte Carlo significance tests , 1989 .

[15]  R. Wayne,et al.  The ecology of three sympatric jackal species in the Rift Valley of Kenya , 1989 .

[16]  T. Dayan,et al.  INTER- AND INTRASPECIFIC CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN MUSTELIDS' , 1989 .

[17]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Genetic and morphological divergence among sympatric canids. , 1989, The Journal of heredity.

[18]  T. Dayan,et al.  Ecological character displacement in Saharo-Arabian Vulpes: outfoxing Bergmann's rule , 1989 .

[19]  J. L. Gittleman.  Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution , 1989, Springer US.

[20]  D Hémon,et al.  Assessing the significance of the correlation between two spatial processes. , 1989, Biometrics.

[21]  David Krackhardt,et al.  PREDICTING WITH NETWORKS: NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF DYADIC DATA * , 1988 .

[22]  Meave G. Leakey,et al.  Stratigraphy and paleontology of Pliocene and Pleistocene localities west of Lake Turkana, Kenya , 1988, Contributions in science.

[23]  S. Legendre,et al.  Correlation of carnassial tooth size and body weight in recent carnivores (mammalia) , 1988 .

[24]  R. Corruccini.  Shape in morphometrics: Comparative analyses , 1987 .

[25]  C. Jaslow.  Morphology and digestive efficiency of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and grey foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) in relation to diet , 1987 .

[26]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometrics in Evolutionary Biology. , 1986 .

[27]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[28]  C. Braak.  Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[29]  J V Neel,et al.  The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomama Indians. XV. Patterns inferred by autocorrelation analysis. , 1986, Genetics.

[30]  J. Gower,et al.  Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients , 1986 .

[31]  R. Wayne.  CRANIAL MORPHOLOGY OF DOMESTIC AND WILD CANIDS: THE INFLUENCE OF DEVELOPMENT ON MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  Lawrence Hubert,et al.  Combinatorial data analysis: Association and partial association , 1985 .

[33]  B. Valkenburgh.  Locomotor diversity within past and present guilds of large predatory mammals , 1985 .

[34]  P. Harvey,et al.  Geographic variation in size and sexual dimorphism of North American weasels , 1985 .

[35]  R. M. Cormack,et al.  Spatial Data Analysis by Example. Volume 1: Point Pattern and Quantitative Data , 1985 .

[36]  D. Schluter,et al.  Ecological Character Displacement in Darwin's Finches , 1985, Science.

[37]  John C. Gower,et al.  Measures of Similarity, Dissimilarity and Distance , 1985 .

[38]  A. Turner.  Extinction, speciation and dispersal in African larger carnivores, from the late Miocene to Recent , 1985 .

[39]  A. Macdonald,et al.  Food niche separation between four sympatric Namib Desert carnivores , 1984 .

[40]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  15. Size Differences Among Sympatric, Bird-Eating Hawks: A Worldwide Survey , 1984 .

[41]  D. Cook,et al.  Multiple regression in geographical mortality studies, with allowance for spatially correlated errors. , 1983, Biometrics.

[42]  E. Dietz.  Permutation Tests for Association Between Two Distance Matrices , 1983 .

[43]  Arthur Getis,et al.  Models of spatial processes : an approach to the study of point, line, and area patterns , 1979 .

[44]  A. Dunham,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN WESTERN AMERICAN CATOSTOMID FISHES , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  J. Mosimann,et al.  NEW STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ALLOMETRY WITH APPLICATION TO FLORIDA RED‐WINGED BLACKBIRDS , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  Fabian M Jaksic,et al.  Latitudinal Size Variation of Chilean Foxes: Tests of Alternative Hypotheses , 1979 .

[47]  G. H. Albrecht.  Some Comments on the Use of Ratios , 1978 .

[48]  M. Hills.  On Ratios—A Response to Atchley, Gaskins, and Anderson , 1978 .

[49]  H. Cooke,et al.  Evolution of African mammals , 1978 .

[50]  J. Finn.  A General Model for Multivariate Analysis , 1978 .

[51]  M. S. Bartlett,et al.  Nearest Neighbour Models in the Analysis of Field Experiments , 1978 .

[52]  Jürg Lamprecht,et al.  ON DIET, FORAGING BEHAVIOUR AND INTERSPECIFIC FOOD COMPETITION OF JACKALS IN THE SERENGETI NATIONAL PARK, EAST AFRICA , 1978 .

[53]  D. Kleiman,et al.  Monogamy in Mammals , 1977, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[54]  L. Hubert,et al.  Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. , 1976 .

[55]  W. Atchley,et al.  Statistical Properties of Ratios. I. Empirical Results , 1976 .

[56]  C. Stuart.  Diet of the Black Backed Jackal Canis Mesomelas in the Central Namib Desert, South West Africa , 1976 .

[57]  R. Huey.  Ecological Character Displacement in a Lizard , 1974 .

[58]  V. Gelder,et al.  The Serengeti Lion , 1973 .

[59]  P. Grant.  Convergent and divergent character displacement , 1972 .

[60]  J. D. P. Bothma.  Food of Canis mesomelas in South Africa , 1971 .

[61]  N. Mantel.  The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[62]  R. Selander.  Sexual Dimorphism and Differential Niche Utilization in Birds , 1966 .

[63]  L. V. Valen,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION AND WIDTH OF ECOLOGICAL NICHE , 1965 .

[64]  B. Kurtén.  The Carnivora of the Palestine caves , 1965 .

[65]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation , 1963 .

[66]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis. , 1960, Growth.

[67]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[68]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin , 1957 .

[69]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains , 1956 .

[70]  R. Geary,et al.  The Contiguity Ratio and Statistical Mapping , 1954 .