Physically based classification and satellite mapping of biophysical characteristics in the southern boreal forest

Fundamental problems inherent to the existing land cover and biophysical characteristic algorithms are fourfold: (1) their failure to deal physically with global and interannual variations in surface reflectance arising from Sun and view angle variations, (2) decoupling of the land cover classification algorithm from the biophysical characteristic inference algorithm with no ability to control biophysical parameter estimation error arising from misclassification, (3) invalid statistical assumptions within classification algorithms used to model reflectance distribution functions, and (4) sole reliance on vegetation indices that can limit performance for several major land cover classes. To address these problems, we develop an integrated, physically based classification and biophysical characteristics estimation algorithm that utilizes canopy reflectance models to account directly for signature variations from Sun angle, topographic, and other variations. Our approach fuses into a single algorithm both land cover classification and biophysical characteristics estimation, permitting one set of physically based canopy reflectance models to be used for both. The use of canopy reflectance models eliminates the need for unrealistic assumptions, such as multivariate-normal distributions, underlying many classification algorithms. Using the algorithm, we have classified a 10,000 km2 area of the BOREAS southern study area. Our classification shows that low-productivity wetland conifer is the dominant land cover and that nearly 7% of the area is occupied by boreal fens, a major source of methane. In addition, nearly 23% of the area has been disturbed by either fire or logging in the last 20 years, suggesting an important role for disturbance to the regional carbon budget. A thorough evaluation of the physically based classifier within the southern study area shows accuracies superior to those obtained with conventional statistically based algorithms, implying even better performance when extended over multiple Landsat frames since the physically based approach can account directly for regional variations in reflectance resulting from varying illumination and viewing conditions (topography, Sun angle). The conifer biomass density estimation algorithm is based on our discovery of a convenient natural relationship between crown height and volumetric density that renders the biomass density for black spruce stands independent of tree height, and a function only of sunlit canopy fraction. This permits us to calculate directly the relationship between reflectance and biomass density. An evaluation of the algorithm using ground sites shows our algorithm can estimate black spruce biomass density with a root-mean-square error of 2.73 kg/ym2 for correctly classified sites. Our evaluation also demonstrates the importance of correct classification. Rootmean-square errors for misclassified sites were 3.96 kg/m2. Using this approach we have estimated the biomass density in the BOREAS southern study area for the dominant land cover type in the circumpolar boreal ecosystem, wetland black spruce. These results show a bimodality to the biomass density regional distribution, controlled perhaps by underlying topographic and edaphic factors.

[1]  Eric A. Smith The First ISLSCP Field Experiment , 1998 .

[2]  Thomas R. Loveland,et al.  Land cover mapping, fire regeneration, and scaling studies in the Canadian boreal forest with 1 km AVHRR and Landsat TM data , 1997 .

[3]  Brian L. Markham,et al.  Variability of boreal forest reflectances as measured from a helicopter platform , 1997 .

[4]  Derek R. Peddle,et al.  Remote sensing of biophysical variables in boreal forest stands of Picea mariana , 1996 .

[5]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Modelling temporal variability in the carbon balance of a spruce/moss boreal forest , 1996 .

[6]  Peter D. Blanken,et al.  Annual cycles of water vapour and carbon dioxide fluxes in and above a boreal aspen forest , 1996 .

[7]  Karl Fred Huemmrich,et al.  Remote Sensing of Forest Biophysical Structure Using Mixture Decomposition and Geometric Reflectance Models , 1995 .

[8]  K. Jon Ranson,et al.  The Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) : an overview and early results from the 1994 field year , 1995 .

[9]  J. Smith,et al.  Fraction Images Derived from Landsat TM and MSS Data for Monitoring Reforested Areas , 1995 .

[10]  C. Justice,et al.  The generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from the NDVI , 1994 .

[11]  Y. Shimabukuro,et al.  Spectral mixture analysis of inland tropical waters , 1994 .

[12]  Brent N. Holben,et al.  Fraction images derived from NOAA AVHRR data for studying the deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon , 1994 .

[13]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  Biophysical, morphological, canopy optical property, and productivity data from the Superior National Forest , 1992 .

[14]  S. Goetz,et al.  Large-Scale Patterns of Forest Succession as Determined by Remote Sensing , 1991 .

[15]  C. Justice,et al.  Global land cover classification by remote sensing: present capabilities and future possibilities , 1991 .

[16]  D. Lloyd,et al.  A phenological classification of terrestrial vegetation cover using shortwave vegetation index imagery , 1990 .

[17]  P. S. Eagleson,et al.  Estimation of subpixel vegetation cover using red-infrared scattergrams , 1990 .

[18]  Alan R. Gillespie,et al.  Vegetation in deserts. I - A regional measure of abundance from multispectral images. II - Environmental influences on regional abundance , 1990 .

[19]  Toby Grier,et al.  A model for radiative transfer in heterogeneous three-dimensional canopies , 1988 .

[20]  N. Goel Models of vegetation canopy reflectance and their use in estimation of biophysical parameters from reflectance data , 1988 .

[21]  P. Sellers,et al.  The First ISLSCP Field Experiment (FIFE) , 1988 .

[22]  Gautam Badhwar,et al.  Signature-Extendable Technology: Global Space-Based Crop Recognition , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Piers J. Sellers,et al.  The first International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP) Field Experiment - FIFE , 1992 .

[24]  A. Strahler,et al.  Geometric-Optical Modeling of a Conifer Forest Canopy , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  Inversion of vegetation canopy reflectance models for estimating agronomic variables. V. Estimation of leaf area index and average leaf angle using measured canopy reflectances , 1984 .

[26]  W. Verhoef Light scattering by leaf layers with application to canopy reflectance modelling: The SAIL model , 1984 .

[27]  J. G. Carnes,et al.  Use of landsat-derived temporal profiles for corn-soybean feature extraction and classification , 1982 .

[28]  R. Kettig,et al.  Classification of Multispectral Image Data by Extraction and Classification of Homogeneous Objects , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[29]  H. M. Horwitz,et al.  Estimating proportions of objects from multispectral scanner data , 1975 .

[30]  G H Ball,et al.  A clustering technique for summarizing multivariate data. , 1967, Behavioral science.