A Bayesian Diagnostic System to Differentiate Glioblastomas from Solitary Brain Metastases

This paper aimed to construct a Bayesian network-based decision support system to differentiate glioblastomas from solitary metastases, based on multimodality MR examination. We enrolled 51 patients with solitary brain tumors (26 with glioblastomas and 25 with solitary brain metastases). These patients underwent contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) examination, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). We generated a set of MR biomarkers, including relative cerebral blood volume in the enhancing region, and fractional anisotropy measured in the immediate peritumoral area. We then generated a Bayesian network model to represent associations among these imaging-derived predictors, and the group membership variable, (glioblastoma or solitary metastasis). This Bayesian network can be used to classify new patients' tumors based on their MR appearance. The Bayesian network model accurately differentiated glioblastomas from solitary metastases. Prediction accuracy was 0.94 (sensitivity = 0.96, specificity = 0.92) based on leave-one-out cross-validation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.90. A Bayesian network-based decision support system accurately differentiates glioblastomas from solitary metastases, based on MR-derived biomarkers.

[1]  Y. Olsson,et al.  Hematogenous metastases of the human brain – Characteristics of peritumoral brain changes: A review , 1997, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[2]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging. , 2002, Radiology.

[3]  Paolo Giudici,et al.  Improving Markov Chain Monte Carlo Model Search for Data Mining , 2004, Machine Learning.

[4]  Yu-Ting Kuo,et al.  Distinction between high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases using peritumoral 3-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion, and perfusion imagings , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[5]  David Maxwell Chickering,et al.  Learning Bayesian Networks: The Combination of Knowledge and Statistical Data , 1994, Machine Learning.

[6]  Sungheon Kim,et al.  Differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases using diffusion tensor imaging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[7]  G. Johnson,et al.  Peritumoral diffusion tensor imaging of high-grade gliomas and metastatic brain tumors. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[8]  Makoto Ochi,et al.  Differentiation between high-grade glioma and metastatic brain tumor using single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy , 2001, European Radiology.

[9]  ChiangIC,et al.  Distinction between high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases using peritumoral 3-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion, and perfusion imagings , 2004 .

[10]  J. Smirniotopoulos,et al.  Glioblastoma multiforme: radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1996, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  R. Soffietti,et al.  Management of brain metastases , 2002, Journal of Neurology.

[12]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[13]  David Schiff,et al.  Single brain metastasis , 2001, Current treatment options in neurology.

[14]  Gregory F. Cooper,et al.  A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data , 1992, Machine Learning.