A Statistical Approach to Mitigating Persistent Clutter in Radar Reflectivity Data

Although there are several effective signal processing methods for identifying and removing radar echoes due to ground clutter, the need to mitigate persistent clutter in radar moment data still exists if such techniques were not applied during data collection and the time series data are not available. A statistical approach to creating a clutter map from “found data”, i.e., data not specifically collected in clear air is described in this paper. Different methods of mitigating ground clutter are then compared using an information theory statistical approach and the best mitigation approach chosen. The technique described in this paper allows for the mitigation of persistent ground clutter returns in archived data where signal processing techniques have not been applied or have been conservatively applied. It is also helpful for correcting mobile radar data where the creation of a clear-air clutter map is impractical. Accordingly, the technique is demonstrated in each of the above situations.

[1]  Judah Rosenblatt,et al.  PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS , 2016 .

[2]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[3]  Richard,et al.  Machine Intelligent Gust Front Detection , 1993 .

[4]  Arthur Witt,et al.  The Storm Cell Identification and Tracking Algorithm: An Enhanced WSR-88D Algorithm , 1998 .

[5]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm , 1998 .

[6]  D. Zrnic,et al.  Ground Clutter Canceling with a Regression Filter , 1999 .

[7]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  An Efficient Methodology for Detection of Anomalous Propagation Echoes in Radar Reflectivity Data Using Neural Networks , 2000 .

[8]  Cathy Kessinger The Radar Echo Classifier for the WSR-88D , 2001 .

[9]  Matthias Steiner,et al.  Use of Three-Dimensional Reflectivity Structure for Automated Detection and Removal of Nonprecipitating Echoes in Radar Data , 2002 .

[10]  Dimitrios Charalampidis,et al.  Removal of nonprecipitation echoes in weather radar using multifractals and intensity , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Valliappa Lakshmanan,et al.  A separable filter for directional smoothing , 2004, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[12]  E. Anagnostou A convective/stratiform precipitation classification algorithm for volume scanning weather radar observations , 2004 .

[13]  A. D. Siggia,et al.  Gaussian model adaptive processing (GMAP) for improved ground clutter cancellation and moment calculation , 2004 .

[14]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[15]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Constructing Three-Dimensional Multiple-Radar Reflectivity Mosaics: Examples of Convective Storms and Stratiform Rain Echoes , 2005 .

[16]  John C. Hubbert,et al.  5 B . 6 REAL TIME CLUTTER IDENTIFICATION AND MITIGATION FOR NEXRAD , 2006 .

[17]  Arthur Witt,et al.  A Real-Time, Three-Dimensional, Rapidly Updating, Heterogeneous Radar Merger Technique for Reflectivity, Velocity, and Derived Products , 2006 .

[18]  Travis M. Smith,et al.  The Warning Decision Support System–Integrated Information , 2007 .

[19]  Travis M. Smith,et al.  An Automated Technique to Quality Control Radar Reflectivity Data , 2007 .

[20]  Valliappa Lakshmanan,et al.  A Technique to Censor Biological Echoes in Radar Reflectivity Data , 2010 .

[21]  Pearlly Yan,et al.  A scalable, flexible workflow for MethylCap-seq data analysis , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Workshop on Genomic Signal Processing and Statistics (GENSIPS).

[22]  Jian Zhang,et al.  National mosaic and multi-sensor QPE (NMQ) system description, results, and future plans , 2011 .