Interrogating participation across disciplinary boundaries: Lessons from political philosophy, cultural studies, art, and education

In view of the prominence of online media and their role in enabling new patterns of activity and engagement, the concept of participation has become an increasingly ubiquitous buzzword across a wide variety of disciplines. However, the specifics of its scope and applications are insufficiently interrogated. This article traces the use of the term, participation, across four domains—political philosophy, cultural studies, art, and education—discussing core assumptions about what constitutes meaningful participation in each instance. In particular, for each of these fields of inquiry, attention will be paid to (a) the definition and key debates around participation, (b) the degrees of meaningful participation, and (c) the strengths of each of these perspectives, particularly in terms of opportunities for productive cross-pollination among these disciplines.

[1]  Ioana Literat,et al.  Measuring New Media Literacies: Towards the Development of a Comprehensive Assessment Tool , 2014, Journal of Media Literacy Education.

[2]  Nico Carpentier,et al.  Introduction : Interrogating audiences - Theoretical horizons of participation , 2011 .

[3]  Aaron Delwiche,et al.  Introduction: What is Participatory Culture? , 2012 .

[4]  P. Norris Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2001 .

[5]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[6]  Nico Carpentier,et al.  Theorizing participatory intensities , 2013 .

[7]  Peter Dahlgren,et al.  Parameters of Online Participation: Conceptualising Civic Contingencies , 2011 .

[8]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[9]  Ragnar Andreas Audunson,et al.  Technology and Social Inclusion. Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Documentation.

[10]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[11]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[12]  Mark Andrejevic,et al.  Exploiting YouTube: Contradictions of user-generated labor , 2009 .

[13]  C. Sandvoss,et al.  Why study Fans , 2007 .

[14]  J. Mcguigan The Cultural Public Sphere , 2005 .

[15]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[16]  M. Deuze,et al.  Co-creative labour , 2009 .

[17]  V. John-Steiner,et al.  Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework , 1996 .

[18]  Axel Bruns,et al.  Life beyond the public sphere: Towards a networked model for political deliberation , 2008, Inf. Polity.

[19]  Henry Jenkins Rethinking ‘Rethinking Convergence/Culture’ , 2014 .

[20]  Augusto Boal,et al.  Theater of the oppressed , 1980 .

[21]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Internet skills and the digital divide , 2011, New Media Soc..

[22]  M. Schäfer Bastard Culture! How User Participation Transforms Cultural Production , 2011 .

[23]  Ramesh Srinivasan,et al.  Digital labor is the new killer app , 2012, New Media Soc..

[24]  Nico Carpentier,et al.  The concept of participation. If they have access and interact, do they really participate? , 2011 .

[25]  C. Pateman Participation and democratic theory , 1970 .

[26]  Paulo Freire,et al.  Pedagogy of the Oppressed , 2019, Toward a Just World Order.

[27]  E. Gidengil,et al.  Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge , 2006 .

[28]  Mira Sotirovic,et al.  A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies , 2001 .

[29]  Lilly U. Nguyen,et al.  BIRDS OF THE INTERNET , 2011 .

[30]  C. Kelty From Participation to Power , 2012 .

[31]  C. Sandvoss Fans: The Mirror of Consumption , 2005 .

[32]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth Of Logical Thinking From Childhood To Adolescence: An Essay On The Construction Of Formal Operational Structures , 1958 .

[33]  Melanie Grunwald,et al.  Convergence Culture Where Old And New Media Collide , 2016 .

[34]  E. Hargittai,et al.  THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1 , 2008 .

[35]  Neta Kligler-Vilenchik Qualitative Political Communication| From Wizards and House-Elves to Real-World Issues: Political Talk in Fan Spaces , 2015 .

[36]  M. Consalvo Cyber-Slaying Media Fans: Code, Digital Poaching, and Corporate Control of the Internet , 2003 .

[37]  R. H. Walters The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence , 1960 .

[38]  Philip Barker,et al.  Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2009 .

[39]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  The virtual sphere 2.0: The internet, the public sphere, and beyond , 2008 .

[40]  Andrea Dahlberg Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art , 2006, Leonardo.

[41]  Aaron Delwiche,et al.  The Participatory Cultures Handbook , 2012 .

[42]  Henry Jenkins,et al.  Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture , 2013 .

[43]  Henry Jenkins Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture , 2006 .

[44]  C. Bishop,et al.  Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics , 2004, October.

[45]  Jennifer Oser,et al.  Is Online Participation Distinct from Offline Participation? A Latent Class Analysis of Participation Types and Their Stratification , 2013 .

[46]  Anthony W. Lee,et al.  The One and the Many: Contemporary Collaborative Art in a Global Context , 2013 .

[47]  Mark Deuze,et al.  Participation, Remediation, Bricolage: Considering Principal Components of a Digital Culture , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[48]  Dan Graham,et al.  THE SOCIAL TURN: COLLABORATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS , 2010 .

[49]  Tiziana Terranova Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy , 2000 .

[50]  Ioana Literat The Work of Art in the Age of Mediated Participation: Crowdsourced Art and Collective Creativity , 2012 .

[51]  Henry Jenkins Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .