Driver distraction and performance effects of highway logo sign design.

Driver distraction and safety concerns have been identified for new highway logo sign configurations. This study assessed driver perception of logo signs and distraction under nine-panel, overflow-combination, or standard six-panel formats. A nine-panel sign has nine business panels within a single sign; a six-panel sign has six panels within a sign; an overflow-combination consists of a standard six-panel sign and a six-panel sign displaying two different services (e.g., food and gas). In this study, twenty-four participants searched for target food business logos while driving in a high-fidelity driving simulation under each signage condition. Gas and lodging signs were also displayed along the road in conventional six-panel formats. Dependent variables included signal detection, visual attention allocation, and vehicle control measures. Experiment results showed nine-panel signs drew greater visual attention and produced lower average speed than overflow-combination signs, and produced a lower speeding percentage compared to six-panel signs. However, there was no evidence the new configurations (nine-panel and overflow) caused substantive performance changes with safety implications. This study suggested the use of nine-panel and overflow-combination logo signs may be suitable for interchanges where there are more than six qualifying businesses in a category in terms of driver performance and safety.

[1]  John D. Lee,et al.  Driver Distraction : Theory, Effects, and Mitigation , 2008 .

[2]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[3]  W W Wierwille,et al.  AUTOMOTIVE ERGONOMICS. CHAPTER 14. VISUAL AND MANUAL DEMANDS OF IN- CAR CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS , 1993 .

[4]  Suzanne E. Lee,et al.  Driving Performance in the Presence and Absence of Billboards , 2003 .

[5]  David Crundall,et al.  Attraction and distraction of attention with roadside advertisements. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[7]  Bryan Reimer,et al.  The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing , 2010, Ergonomics.

[8]  Peter Bengtsson,et al.  A comparison of two contemporary types of in-car multifunctional interfaces. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  Tim Horberry,et al.  Effects of advertising billboards during simulated driving. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Conflicts of interest: The implications of roadside advertising for driver attention , 2009 .

[11]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  The interaction between driving and in-vehicle information systems: comparison of results from laboratory, simulator and real-world studies , 2005 .

[12]  John W. Senders,et al.  THE ATTENTIONAL DEMAND OF AUTOMOBILE DRIVING , 1967 .

[13]  Michael G. Lenné,et al.  Effects on driving performance of interacting with an in-vehicle music player: a comparison of three interface layout concepts for information presentation. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone , 2005 .

[15]  Christopher D. Gregory,et al.  The attraction and the distraction , 2011 .

[16]  C. H. Edwards Applied ergonomics. , 1990, Work.

[17]  G. A. Mack,et al.  A Friedman-Type Rank Test for Main Effects in a Two-Factor ANOVA , 1980 .

[18]  J. Dankelman,et al.  Relationships between driving simulator performance and driving test results , 2009, Ergonomics.

[19]  MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS , 2012 .

[20]  Jessica Edquist,et al.  The Effects of Visual Clutter on Driving Performance , 2009 .

[21]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Driving and Side Task Performance: The Effects of Display Clutter, Separation, and Modality , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[22]  B. Wallace EXTERNAL-TO-VEHICLE DRIVER DISTRACTION , 2003 .

[23]  Joseph E. Hummer,et al.  Laboratory Test of Driver Responses to Nine-Panel Logo Signs , 2008 .