Does human ejaculate quality relate to phenotypic traits?

A given man's phenotype embodies cues of his ancestral ability to effectively defend himself and his kin from harm, to survive adverse conditions, and to acquire status and mating opportunities. In this review, we explore the hypothesis that a man's phenotype also embodies cues to fertility or the probability that an ejaculate will fertilize ova. Female mate choice depends on the ability to discern the quality of a male reproductive partner through his phenotype, and male fertility may be among the traits that females have evolved to detect. A female who selects as mates males that deliver higher quality ejaculates will, on average, be more fecund than her competitors. Data on several non‐human species demonstrate correlations between ejaculate quality and secondary sexual characteristics that inform female mate choice, suggesting that females may select mates in part on the basis of fertility. While the non‐human literature on this topic has advanced, the human literature remains limited in scope and there is no clear consensus on appropriate methodologies or theoretical positions. We provide a comprehensive review and meta‐analysis of this literature, and conclude by proposing solutions to the many issues that impede progress in the field. In the process, we hope to encourage interest and insight from investigators in other areas of human mating and reproductive biology. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 28:318–329, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  A. Little,et al.  Facial attractiveness. , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[2]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Context-dependent relationship between a composite measure of men’s mate value and ejaculate quality , 2014 .

[3]  J. Kekäläinen,et al.  Male facial attractiveness and masculinity may provide sex‐ and culture‐independent cues to semen quality , 2014, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[4]  Christopher J. Holden,et al.  Partner attractiveness moderates the relationship between number of sexual rivals and in-pair copulation frequency in humans (Homo sapiens). , 2014, Journal of comparative psychology.

[5]  T. Shackelford,et al.  Human Sperm Competition: A Comparative Evolutionary Analysis , 2014 .

[6]  M. Haselton,et al.  Do women's mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  T. Shackelford,et al.  The Relationship Between Objective Sperm Competition Risk and Men’s Copulatory Interest Is Moderated by Partner’s Time Spent with Other Men , 2013, Human Nature.

[8]  A. Møller,et al.  Do male secondary sexual characters signal ejaculate quality? A meta‐analysis , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[9]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Telling facial metrics: facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men , 2013 .

[10]  A. Pacey Are sperm counts declining? Or did we just change our spectacles? , 2013, Asian journal of andrology.

[11]  G. Parker,et al.  SPERM COMPETITION GAMES: A GENERAL MODEL FOR PRECOPULATORY MALE–MALE COMPETITION , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  Hong Lu,et al.  Correlations between digit ratio and infertility in Chinese men. , 2012, Early human development.

[13]  J. Kekäläinen,et al.  Male Facial Anthropometry and Attractiveness , 2012, Perception.

[14]  N. Cherry,et al.  Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for poor semen quality: a case-referent study. , 2012, Human reproduction.

[15]  K. Navara,et al.  Comb size and color relate to sperm quality: a test of the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis , 2012 .

[16]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[17]  J. Pellikka,et al.  Do Female Sex Fantasies Reflect Adaptations for Sperm Competition? , 2012 .

[18]  K. Kościński Hand attractiveness—its determinants and associations with facial attractiveness , 2012 .

[19]  T. Schmoll,et al.  No Evidence for Pre-Copulatory Sexual Selection on Sperm Length in a Passerine Bird , 2012, PloS one.

[20]  C. Apicella,et al.  Masculine voices signal men's threat potential in forager and industrial societies , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Low Pitched Voices Are Perceived as Masculine and Attractive but Do They Predict Semen Quality in Men? , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  Juan David Leongómez,et al.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts facial, but not voice or body odour, attractiveness in men , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Stefan Van Dongen,et al.  Human fluctuating asymmetry in relation to health and quality: a meta-analysis , 2011 .

[24]  Paul L. Vasey,et al.  Sexual Selection and the Origins of Human Mating Systems , 2011 .

[25]  G. Sorci,et al.  Sexually extravagant males age more rapidly. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[26]  M. Cohn,et al.  Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  J. Auger,et al.  Second to fourth digit ratios, male genital development and reproductive health: a clinical study among fertile men and testis cancer patients. , 2011, International journal of andrology.

[28]  Michael Gurven,et al.  Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  C. Hodges-Simeon,et al.  Voice Correlates of Mating Success in Men: Examining “Contests” Versus “Mate Choice” Modes of Sexual Selection , 2011, Archives of sexual behavior.

[30]  K. Kościński Determinants of Hand Attractiveness—A Study Involving Digitally Manipulated Stimuli , 2011, Perception.

[31]  S. Bertram,et al.  Song and Sperm in Crickets: A Trade‐off between Pre‐ and Post‐copulatory Traits or Phenotype‐Linked Fertility? , 2011 .

[32]  L. Simmons,et al.  Quantitative genetic variation in courtship song and its covariation with immune function and sperm quality in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus , 2010 .

[33]  J. Evans Quantitative genetic evidence that males trade attractiveness for ejaculate quality in guppies , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  G. Sorci,et al.  Male health status, signalled by courtship display, reveals ejaculate quality and hatching success in a lekking species. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[35]  P. Gajer,et al.  Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  J. Fahey,et al.  REVIEW ARTICLE: Sex Hormone Regulation of Innate Immunity in the Female Reproductive Tract: The Role of Epithelial Cells in Balancing Reproductive Potential with Protection against Sexually Transmitted Pathogens , 2010, American journal of reproductive immunology.

[37]  J. Swaddle,et al.  Plumage coloration, ejaculate quality and reproductive phenotype in the red-backed fairy-wren , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  T. Shackelford,et al.  Book Review: A Biased, Incomplete Perspective on the Evolution of Human Mating Systems , 2010 .

[39]  L. Gottfredson,et al.  Why is intelligence correlated with semen quality? Biochemical pathways common to sperm and neuron function and their vulnerability to pleiotropic mutations , 2009, Communicative & integrative biology.

[40]  J. Hausser,et al.  Testis size, sperm characteristics and testosterone concentrations in four species of shrews (Mammalia, Soricidae). , 2009, Animal reproduction science.

[41]  W. Walker Molecular mechanisms of testosterone action in spermatogenesis , 2009, Steroids.

[42]  G. Miller,et al.  Intelligence and semen quality are positively correlated , 2009 .

[43]  D. Hanley,et al.  Secondary sexual characters and sperm traits in coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch. , 2009, Journal of fish biology.

[44]  J. Mendiola,et al.  Food intake and its relationship with semen quality: a case-control study. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[45]  T. Birkhead,et al.  Selection on sperm morphology under relaxed sperm competition in a wild passerine bird , 2009, Biology Letters.

[46]  D. Houle,et al.  Is there a g factor for fitness? , 2008, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[47]  P. J. Moore,et al.  Sperm competition within a dominance hierarchy: investment in social status vs. investment in ejaculates , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[48]  D. Hosken,et al.  Attractive males have greater success in sperm competition , 2008, Current Biology.

[49]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[50]  C. Desplan,et al.  The Color-Vision Circuit in the Medulla of Drosophila , 2008, Current Biology.

[51]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Does attractiveness in men provide clues to semen quality? , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[52]  Zachary L. Simmons,et al.  Women's estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men's testosterone , 2008, Hormones and Behavior.

[53]  C. Apicella,et al.  Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers , 2007, Biology Letters.

[54]  M. Voracek,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR ASSORTATIVE MATING ON DIGIT RATIO (2D:4D), A BIOMARKER FOR PRENATAL ANDROGEN EXPOSURE , 2007, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[55]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Contributions of the face and body to overall attractiveness , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[56]  J. Boivin,et al.  International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[57]  T. Shackelford,et al.  Absence makes the adaptations grow fonder: proportion of time apart from partner, male sexual psychology, and sperm competition in humans (Homo sapiens). , 2007, Journal of comparative psychology.

[58]  Ian J Deary,et al.  Premorbid (early life) IQ and later mortality risk: systematic review. , 2007, Annals of epidemiology.

[59]  B. Buunk,et al.  Human intelligence, fluctuating asymmetry and the peacock’s tail: General intelligence (g) as an honest signal of fitness , 2006 .

[60]  J. Evans,et al.  Colourful male guppies produce faster and more viable sperm , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[61]  M. Haselton,et al.  Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention , 2006 .

[62]  L. Simmons,et al.  Sexual selection and mate choice. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  Nick Neave,et al.  Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: An evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[64]  P. Innocenti,et al.  Length of index and ring fingers differentially influence sexual attractiveness of men’s and women’s hands , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[65]  M. Haselton,et al.  Women’s fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence , 2006, Human nature.

[66]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[67]  A. Bang,et al.  A study of finger lengths, semen quality and sex hormones in 360 young men from the general Danish population. , 2005, Human reproduction.

[68]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Women's sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[69]  T. Shackelford,et al.  Psychological and Physiological Adaptations to Sperm Competition in Humans , 2005 .

[70]  H. Stryhn,et al.  Discrepancies in the determination of sperm concentration using Bürker-Türk, Thoma and Makler counting chambers. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[71]  Geoffrey P. Miller,et al.  Intelligence tests with higher g-loadings show higher correlations with body symmetry: Evidence for a general fitness factor mediated by developmental stability , 2005 .

[72]  Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford,et al.  Mate retention, semen displacement, and human sperm competition: a preliminary investigation of tactics to prevent and correct female infidelity , 2005 .

[73]  D. Perrett,et al.  Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[74]  M. Gomendio,et al.  Antlers honestly advertise sperm production and quality , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[75]  G. Hill,et al.  Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[76]  Susan M. Hughes,et al.  Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration , 2004 .

[77]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Human sperm competition: testis size, sperm production and rates of extrapair copulations , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[78]  Rebecca C. Knickmeyer,et al.  2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. , 2004, Early human development.

[79]  G. Barceló-Coblijn,et al.  Gene expression and molecular composition of phospholipids in rat brain in relation to dietary n-6 to n-3 fatty acid ratio. , 2003, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[80]  C. Soler,et al.  Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality , 2003 .

[81]  L. Simmons,et al.  Are body fluctuating asymmetry and the ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length reliable predictors of semen quality? , 2003, Human reproduction.

[82]  J. Swaddle,et al.  Digit Ratio: A Pointer to Fertility, Behavior, and Health , 2002, Heredity.

[83]  L. Simmons,et al.  EVOLUTION OF EJACULATES: PATTERNS OF PHENOTYPIC AND GENOTYPIC VARIATION AND CONDITION DEPENDENCE IN SPERM COMPETITION TRAITS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[84]  J. Evans,et al.  Male phenotype predicts insemination success in guppies , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[85]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females , 2002 .

[86]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[87]  D. Perrett,et al.  Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[88]  Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford,et al.  Psychological adaptation to human sperm competition , 2002 .

[89]  C. Gottlieb,et al.  Testosterone for male contraception during one year: attitudes, well-being and quality of sex life. , 2001, Contraception.

[90]  Hiroaki Shibahara,et al.  ANDROLOGY: Relationships Between Sperm Motility Characteristics Assessed by the Computer-Aided Sperm Analysis (CASA) and Fertilization Rates In Vitro , 2001, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[91]  J. Pemberton,et al.  Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion , 2001, Nature.

[92]  S. Collins,et al.  Men's voices and women's choices , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[93]  L. Keller,et al.  How Males Can Gain by Harming Their Mates: Sexual Conflict, Seminal Toxins, and the Cost of Mating , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[94]  J. Simpson,et al.  The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[95]  A. Campana,et al.  Evaluation of 'round cells' in semen analysis: a comparative study. , 2000, Human reproduction update.

[96]  A. Lenzi,et al.  Fatty acid composition of spermatozoa and immature germ cells. , 2000, Molecular human reproduction.

[97]  M. Bellis,et al.  Human Sperm Competition: Copulation, Masturbation and Infidelity , 1999 .

[98]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[99]  Ivar Folstad,et al.  Cod courtship song: a song at the expense of dance? , 1999 .

[100]  A. Burdorf,et al.  Occupationally related exposures and reduced semen quality: a case-control study. , 1999, Fertility and sterility.

[101]  J T Manning,et al.  The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[102]  T. K. Jensen,et al.  Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners , 1998, The Lancet.

[103]  D. I. Lewis-Jones,et al.  Developmental Stability, Ejaculate Size, and Sperm Quality in Men , 1998 .

[104]  J A McNally,et al.  In vitro fertilization and pregnancy rates: the influence of sperm motility and morphology on IVF outcome. , 1998, Fertility and sterility.

[105]  J. Jenkins The voice of the castrato , 1998, The Lancet.

[106]  T. Vogt,et al.  The mouse Ulnaless mutation deregulates posterior HoxD gene expression and alters appendicular patterning. , 1997, Development.

[107]  Y. Hérault,et al.  Ulnaless (Ul), a regulatory mutation inducing both loss-of-function and gain-of-function of posterior Hoxd genes. , 1997, Development.

[108]  S. Mortimer,et al.  A critical review of the physiological importance and analysis of sperm movement in mammals. , 1997, Human reproduction update.

[109]  B. Depoorter,et al.  The performance of 10 different methods for the estimation of sperm concentration. , 1997, Fertility and sterility.

[110]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and psychometric intelligence , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[111]  A. Magurran,et al.  Male display rate reveals ejaculate characteristics in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata. , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[112]  C. Catchpole,et al.  Song, sperm quality and testes asymmetry in the sedge warbler , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[113]  T. Birkhead,et al.  Male phenotype and ejaculate quality in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[114]  D. Shapiro,et al.  Sexual conflict: males with highest mating success convey the lowest fertilization benefits to females , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[115]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Human Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Behavior , 1994 .

[116]  B. Sheldon Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[117]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. , 1994 .

[118]  M. Bellis,et al.  Human sperm competition: ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[119]  M. Bellis,et al.  Human sperm competition: ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[120]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Why do Females Make it so Difficult for Males to Fertilize their Eggs , 1993 .

[121]  D. Schluter,et al.  Sexual selection when the female directly benefits , 1993 .

[122]  A. Feingold,et al.  Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[123]  R. Lynn Testosterone and Gonadotropin Levels and R/K Reproductive Strategies , 1990, Psychological reports.

[124]  M. Bellis,et al.  Do females promote sperm competition? Data for humans , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[125]  R. Robin Baker,et al.  Number of sperm in human ejaculates varies in accordance with sperm competition theory , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[126]  E. Sadalla,et al.  Dominance and heterosexual attraction , 1987 .

[127]  W. Mosher Reproductive impairments in the united states, 1965–1982 , 1985, Demography.

[128]  F. Labrie A new approach in the hormonal treatment of prostate cancer: complete instead of partial blockade of androgens. , 1984, International journal of andrology.

[129]  D. Dewsbury,et al.  Ejaculate Cost and Male Choice , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[130]  D. Mishell,et al.  Sperm Distribution and Degradation in the Human Female Reproductive Tract , 1970, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[131]  A. Varghese,et al.  The genetic causes of male factor infertility: a review. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[132]  Organización Mundial de la Salud WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen , 2010 .

[133]  H. Seo,et al.  Is the Index Finger and Ring Finger Ratio (2D:4D) Reliable Predictor of Semen Quality? , 2010, Korean journal of urology.

[134]  Mark D. Prokosch,et al.  Intelligence and mate choice: intelligent men are always appealing , 2009 .

[135]  V. Gatta,et al.  Male infertility: role of genetic background. , 2007, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[136]  A. Skinner,et al.  Phenotypic correlates of spermatozoon quality in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 2007 .

[137]  A. Pacey,et al.  Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract. , 2006, Human reproduction update.

[138]  F. Byrn,et al.  Does Red Junglefowl Comb Size Predict Sperm Swimming Speed and Motility , 2006 .

[139]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Unraveling the enigma of human intelligence: Evolutionary psychology and the multimodular mind. , 2002 .

[140]  Michael C. Bailey,et al.  The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[141]  J. Manning,et al.  Second to fourth digit ratio and male ability in sport: implications for sexual selection in humans. , 2001, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[142]  D. Perrett,et al.  Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence , 2000 .

[143]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[144]  P. Zavos,et al.  Clinical improvements of specific seminal deficiencies via intercourse with a seminal collection device versus masturbation. , 1989, Fertility and sterility.