Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study

Advocates of open systems believe that problems related to compatibility, interoperability, scalability, and efficient use of IT resources can be resolved by setting software and hardware standards and strictly adhering to these standards in systems development and management. Representing a major departure from the traditional way of running an IS operation, the adoption of open systems has major ramifications on the IT infrastructure with long-lasting effects. Unfortunately, little research has been done to study this ubiquitous phenomenon despite its impacts on organizational computing worldwide. To fill this research gap, a model that incorporates seven factors perceived to affect the adoption is developed and tested. In-depth interviews with senior executives responsible for managing corporate IS functions from 89 organizations were conducted to collect data for empirical analysis. The findings suggest that organizations tend to (1) focus more on their "ability to adopt" than on the "benefits from adoption," and (2) take a "reactive" rather than "proactive" attitude in adopting open systems technology. Managerial implications are also discussed.

[1]  P. Attewell.  Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[2]  L. Phillips.  Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing , 1981 .

[3]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Industrial Research and Technological Innovation: An Econometric Analysis , 1968 .

[4]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Information Technology and Organizational Structure , 1977 .

[5]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Effectiveness of External Information Channels in Facilitating Innovation Within Software Development Groups , 1983, MIS Q..

[6]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Initiation, Adoption, and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U.S. Organizations , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion , 1986 .

[8]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects , 1989 .

[9]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Microcomputer adoption - The impact of organizational size and structure , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  The Problem of Statistical Power in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  M. Moch,et al.  Size, Centralization and Organizational Adoption of Innovations , 1977 .

[12]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Conceptual issues in the study of innovation , 1976 .

[13]  William D. Perreault,et al.  A Conceptual Paradigm and Approach for the Study of Innovators , 1981 .

[14]  D. Campbell.  The Informant in Quantitative Research , 1955, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 2017 .

[16]  M. Kamien,et al.  Market structure and innovation , 1982 .

[17]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[18]  Arun Rai,et al.  An Organizational Context for CASE Innovation , 1993 .

[19]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems innovation among organizations , 1994 .

[20]  Sue A. Conger,et al.  INNOVATIONS : A CLASSIFICATION BY IT LOCUS OF IMPACT AND RESEARCH APPROACH , 2002 .

[21]  John S. Fryer.  The Production and Application of New Industrial Technology , 1977 .

[22]  Terry A. Critchley,et al.  Open systems - the reality , 1993, BCS practitioner series.

[23]  M. Fleischer,et al.  processes of technological innovation , 1990 .

[24]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[25]  Timothy H. Hannan,et al.  The Determinants of Technology Adoption: The Case of the Banking Firm , 1984 .

[26]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[27]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[28]  J. Hage,et al.  Theories of organizations , 1980 .

[29]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Organizational Adoption of Microcomputer Technology: The Role of Sector , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  R. O'Callaghan,et al.  Adoption Correlates and Share Effects of Electronic Data Interchange Systems in Marketing Channels , 1992 .

[31]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Rajeev K. Goel,et al.  Facilitating Technological Change: The Human Resource Challenge. , 1989 .

[33]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[34]  Michael Aiken,et al.  Organizational Structure, Work Process, and Proposal Making in Administrative Bureaucracies , 1980 .

[35]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations: An Empirical Test. , 1990 .

[36]  R. Zmud.  Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization , 1982 .

[37]  R. Daft.  A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation , 1978 .

[38]  P. Rosenzweig,et al.  When can management science research be generalized internationally , 1994 .

[39]  Chee-Chuong Sum,et al.  Critical success factors in implementing MRP and government assistance: A Singapore context , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[40]  A. Romeo.  Interindustry and Interfirm Differences in the Rate of Diffusion of an Innovation , 1975 .

[41]  W. Hauck,et al.  Wald's Test as Applied to Hypotheses in Logit Analysis , 1977 .

[42]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[44]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[45]  Soon Ang,et al.  The Adoption of TradeNet by the Trading Community: An Empirical Analysis , 1994, ICIS.